medigraphic.com

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hum Med 2019; 19 (1)

Dimensions that affect implementation of the quality system in the Center of Immunology and Biological Products

León RCC, Betancourt-Bethencourt JA

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 131-143
PDF size: 433.84 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The implementation of the system of management of the quality in the Center of Immunology and Biological Products has not produced the expected results.
Target: to exhibit factors that affect the implementation of the system.
Methods: An exploratory descriptive study was carried out through a survey from January until May, 2018 in the Center of Immunology and Biological Products of the University of Medical Sciences of Camagüey, Cuba. The universe shaped by 31 persons to whom there was applied a survey, which was analyzed by the methods of test re-test and Alpha of Cronbach.
Results: The answers to the survey reflected that all the activities of the center have not been integrated to the system of management of the quality, the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is not achieved for its implementation. It was demonstrated leadership of order and control and it persisted the opinion that with the manuals of organization and a hierarchical structure would achieve the expected results. The managers do not contribute all their potential to this work, the beneficiaries neither have turned into participants nor have constituted networks rhizome with high communication among themselves and style of self-organized work and participative activities have not been systematized in search of team consensus.
Discussion: There were identified factors that affect the implementation of the system of management of the quality and a change of paradigm is proposed towards the knowledge integration to achieve sustainably the wished changes.


REFERENCES

  1. Padovani Clemente S, Pazos San Martín E, Padovani Cantón AM, Ruano Ortega M. Determinantes sociales de la salud y sistema de gestión de la calidad en servicios estomatológicos. Rev haban cienc méd [Internet]. 2014 [citado 3/4/2018]; 13(5). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729- 519X2014000500013&lng=es.

  2. Gabastou JM. Curso de gestión de calidad y buenas prácticas de laboratorio. Washington: OPS; 2016.

  3. CUBAHORA [Internet]. 2016 [citado 3/4/2018] Tecnologías aplicadas en el sector de salud, buen paso y prometedores desafíos. Disponible en: http://www.cubahora.cu/ciencia-y-tecnologia/tecnologias-aplicadas-en-el-sector-desalud- buen-paso-y-prometedores-desafios

  4. C ISO-9000:2015. Norma Cubana Sistemas de Gestión de la Calidad Fundamentos y vocabulario. La Habana: ONN; 2015.

  5. Sturmberg J. Systems and complexity thinking in general practice. Australian Family Physician 2007;36(3):170-3.

  6. Plsek P, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: the challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001; 323(7313):625-8.

  7. Thompson D, Fazio X, Kustra E, Patrick L, Stanley S. Scoping review of complexity theory in health services research. BMC Health Services Research 2016;16(87):1-9.

  8. R-Core-Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Internet].2018 [citado 3/4/2019]. Disponible en: http://www.r.project.org

  9. Sarriot E, Sacks E, Larson A. Self-organization and emergence in global health. Insights from practice, blind spots and possible contributions from complexity science. Int J of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 2016; 11(4):644-53.

  10. Vila Morales D, Hernández Fernández H, Martínez Álvarez F. El diseño curricular doctoral desde la perspectiva transdisciplinaria. Rev. Cubana Edu. Superior [Internet]. 2016[citado 3/4/2018]; 35(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0257-43142016000100010

  11. Betancourt Bethencourt JA, Martínez Álvarez F, Álvarez Escoda M, Nicolau Pestano E. Estrategia de superación transdisciplinaria para la investigación. Rev Hum Med [Internet]. 2016 [citado 3/4/2018]; 16(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727- 81202016000300004&lng=es

  12. Fajardo Ortíz G, Fernández Ortega MA, Ortiz Montalvo A, Olivares Santos R. La dimensión del paradigma de la complejidad en los sistemas de salud. Cirugía y Cirujanos [Internet]. 2015[citado 3/4/2018]; 83(1).Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-cirugia-cirujanos-139-articulo-la-dimension-delparadigma- complejidad-S000974111500033X

  13. Senge P. La quinta disciplina. Barcelona: Granica; 1992.

  14. Herrscher E. Primeras Conversaciones del Extremo Sur. Ushuaia: Universidades Nacionales de Tierra del Fuego y de la Patagonia;2012.

  15. Caffrey L, Wolfe C, McKevitt C. Embedding research in health systems: lessons from complexity theory. Health Research Policy and Systems 2016;14(54).

  16. Betancourt Bethencourt JA, Fernández Franch N, Mirabal Nápoles M, Losano Casanova J. Exploración sobre la calidad de las investigaciones y la producción científica en Camagüey, Cuba. Rev Cubana Hig Epidemiol [Internet]. 2012 [citado 3/4/2018]; 50(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561- 30032012000300005&lng=es

  17. Koerner M, Klein L. Projects as difference - towards a next practice of complex project management. 22nd IPMA World Congress. Roma; 2008.

  18. Fraser S, Greenhalgh T. Complexity Science: Coping with complexity:educating for capability. British Medical Journal [Internet]. 2001[citado 3/4/2018]; 323(7316). Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1121342/.

  19. Broersma C. Is it Time to Change? Infusing the Transdisciplinary Approach into Social Work Studies. Journal of Sociology and Social Work. 2014;2(2):145-54.

  20. Betancourt Bethencourt JA, Martínez Álvarez F. Dimensión educativa de una estrategia de superación transdisciplinaria para la gestión de proyectos de investigación en salud. QhaliKay Revista de Ciencias de la Salud [Internet]. 2017[citado 3/4/2018]; 1(3). Disponible en: http://revistas.utm.edu.ec/index.php/QhaliKay/issue/view/99

  21. Araujo González R. Valor epistemológico de la Teoría de la Complejidad para la Medicina. Rev Hum Med [Internet]. 2008[[citado 3/4/2018]; 8(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727- 81202008000100003&lng=es

  22. Libreros Piñeros L. El proceso salud enfermedad y la transdisciplinariedad. Rev Cubana Salud Pública [Internet]. 2012 [citado 3/4/2018] ; 38( 4 ). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864- 34662012000400013&lng=es.

  23. Vidal Ledo MJ, Obregón Martín M, Gálvez González A, Morales Valera A, Gómez de Haz H, Quesada Espinosa F. La Salud Pública: Sistema complejo. INFODIR [Internet]. 2016 [citado 3/4/2018];0(13). Disponible en: http://revinfodir.sld.cu/index.php/infodir/article/view/312

  24. Lipsitz A. Understanding Health Care as a Complex System. JAMA. 2012;308(3):243-4.

  25. Kwamie A. Balancing management and leadership in complex health systems: Comment on “Management matters: a leverage point for health systems strengthening in global health. Int J Health Policy Manag 2015;4(12):849-51.

  26. Martínez-García M, Hernández-Lemus E. Health Systems as Complex Systems American Journal of Operations Research [Internet]. 2013[citado 3/4/2018];3. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2013.31A011




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com