medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2019, Number 01

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2019; 87 (01)

Efficacy and safety of the use of transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin vs oxytocin only in the induction of labor in patients with previous caesarean section

Guerrero-Patiño NR, Aguilera-Cervantes SM, González-Aldeco PM, Rodríguez-Ayala C

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 26-35
PDF size: 449.53 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate whether the combination of transcervical Foley catheter with intravenous oxytocin as a method for induction of labor in patients with previous caesarean section is more effective than using only intravenous oxytocin in achieving an active phase of labor and therefore increasing the frequency of vaginal delivery.
Materials and Methods: Case-control study performed at the Nuevo Sanatorio Durango Hospital Center from March 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018. Case-control study carried out at the New Sanatorio Durango Hospital Center from March 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018. Inclusion criteria: gestational age greater than or equal to 37 weeks, previous caesarean section with low transverse incision (Kerr), pregnancy unique, fetus in cephalic presentation. Two groups were created: group A, induction of labor with intravenous oxytocin and group B induction with transcervical foley plus oxytocin. The categorical variables are described with percentages and percentages, and the numerical variables with means ± standard deviation or median. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Student's t test were used; A value of p ‹0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Patients were studied, in group A of 25 patients, 16/25 achieved an active phase of labor and 14/25 had vaginal resolution; group B of 25 patients, 25/25 reached the active phase and 17/25 had vaginal resolution, we obtained a value of p › 0.05 (95%CI: 0.16-0.4). The time in labor hours: group A with an average of 17.11 hours and in group B of 12.44, p value ‹ 0.05 (95%CI: 2.4-6.2 and 2.4-6.3).
Conclusions: The combination of transcervical Foley catheter with oxytocin proved to be highly effective and safe for the induction of labor in patients with a previous caesarean section, significantly reducing labor time and increasing the frequency of patients who achieve an active dose of labor.


REFERENCES

  1. Parto después de una cesárea; Guía de práctica clínica http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/desc argas/gpc/Catalogo Maestro/IMSS_605_13_PARTODESPUESDECESAREA/605GER.pdf

  2. Reducción de la Frecuencia de OPERACIÓN CESÁREA. México: Secretaria de Salud; 27/marzo/2014. http://www. cenetec.salud.gob.mx/descargas/gpc/CatalogoMaestro/ IMSS_605_13_PARTODESPUESDECESAREA/605GER.pdf

  3. Kehl S, Weiss C, Rath W. Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016;204:44-50. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505

  4. Budden A, Chen L, Henry A. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014. http:// doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009701.pub2.

  5. Inducción del Trabajo de Parto en el Segundo Nivel de Atención. México: Secretaria de salud; 21/marzo/ 2013. http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/interior/ gpc.html

  6. Quesnel GBC, López-Rioja MJ, Monzalbo-Núñez DE. Parto después de cesárea ¿una opción segura? Ginecol Obstet Mex 2015; 83:69-87. http://www.medigraphic.com/ pdfs/ginobsmex/gom-2015/gom152b.

  7. Practice Bulletin No. 184: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017;130(5):e217-e233. http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002398.

  8. Aragón-Hernández JP, Ávila-Vergara MA, BeltránMontoya J, y col. Protocolo clínico para inducción del trabajo de parto: propuesta de consenso. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2017;85(5):314-324. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/gom/ v85n5/0300-9041-gom-85-05-00314.

  9. Jozwiak, M., van de Lest, H., Burger, N., Dijksterhuis, M. and De Leeuw, J. Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2014;93(3):296-301. http://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12320

  10. WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/books/NBK131963/

  11. Ferradas, E., Alvarado, I., Gabilondo, M., Diez-Itza, I. and García-Adanez, J. Double balloon device compared to oxytocin for induction of labour after previous caesarean section. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013;03(01):212-216. http://doi.org/10.4236/ ojog.2013.31A039

  12. Radan Anda-Petronelaa, Amylidi-Mohr Sofiaa, Mosimann Beatrixa, Simillion Cedricb, Raio Luigia, Mueller Martinabc, Surbek Danielab; Safety and effectiveness of labour induction after caesarean section using balloon catheter or oxytocin. Swiss Medical Weekly 2017;147(4546). http://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2017.14532

  13. Gonsalves, H., Al-Riyami, N., Al-Dughaishi, T., Gowri, V., Al-Azri, M. and Salahuddin, A. (2016). Use of Intracervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labour in Cases of Previous Caesarean Section: Experience of a single tertiary centre in Oman. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 16(4), pp. e445-450. http://doi.org/10.18295/ squmj.2016.16.04.007

  14. Schoen, C., Grant, G., Berghella, V., Hoffman, M. and Sciscione, A. Intracervical Foley Catheter With and Without Oxytocin for Labor Induction. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017;129(6):1046-1053. http://doi.org/10.1097/ AOG.0000000000002032.

  15. Abraham C. Foley Plus Oxytocin Compared With Oxytocin for Induction After Membrane Rupture. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;131(4):744. http://doi.org/10.1097/ AOG.0000000000002374.

  16. El Khouly, N. A prospective randomized trial comparing Foley catheter, oxytocin, and combination Foley catheter-oxytocin for labour induction with unfavourable cervix. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2016;37(3):309-314. http://doi.org/10.1080/0144361 5.2016.1239075.

  17. Jozwiak M, Dodd JM; Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section (Protocol); The Cochrane Collaboration; 2017. http://doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub2.

  18. Patel, S., Godcharles, C., McDowell, M., Miladinovic, B. and Holmstrom, S. Induction of Labor Methods. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016;127:104S-105S. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.014.

  19. Vigilancia y Manejo del Trabajo de Parto en Embarazo de Bajo Riesgo: México: Secretaria de Salud; 11/diciembre/2014. http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/interior/gpc.html

  20. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of Labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009;114(2, Part 1):386-397. http:// doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5

  21. Kashanian, M., Nazemi, M. and Malakzadegan, A. Comparison of 30-mL and 80-mL Foley catheter balloons and oxytocin for preinduction cervical ripening. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2009;105(2):174- 175. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.01.005.

  22. Catherine Y. Spong, MD1, Vincenzo Berghella, MD2,6, Katharine D. Wenstrom, MD3, Brian M. Mercer, MD4,7, and George R. Saade, MD5; Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery: Summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop; NIH Public Access; Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1181–1193. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.010.

  23. Protocolo inducción del parto y métodos de maduración cervical; Hospital Clinic De Barcelona; Medicina Materno Fetal. https://medicinafetalbarcelona.org/protocolos/es/ obstetricia/inducci%C3%B3n%20del%20parto.

  24. Spong C, et al. Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 2014;34(1):8-9. http://doi. org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182704880.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com