Hernández-Colín V, Aguilar-Cacho FJ, Toraño-Zamudio VH, Sandoval-Jurado L, Ceballos-Martínez ZI

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 75-79
PDF size: 160.99 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: HPV is one of the most often sexual transmitted diseases, and knowing the transmission mechanisms is vital to control the incidence of this infection.
Objective: To evaluate the level of knowledge regarding transmission mechanisms in patients with HPV infection.
Methodology: 109 first timers and subsequent patients who showed up to the Displasias Clinic for diagnosis of HPV were included in the study. To evaluate the level of knowledge, three indicators were considered; good (›20 items answered correctly), regular (16-20 items answered correctly), and bad (= or ‹ 15 items answered correctly). The questionnaire was validated by review of experts.
Results: From the total, 31.2% patients had good, 42.2% regular, and 26.6% bad knowledge. 47.7% out of 109 patients are half low socioeconomic status; 49.5% with elementary school of education; 67% got married; 54.1% with a single sexual partner; 44% sexual actives; and 77.1% had not received any sort of information talks regarding HPV.
Conclusions: It is evident the necessity of implementing new and diverse strategies lead to affected population through learning the transmission mechanisms to increase their level of knowledge and collaborate in the control of virus spreading.

REFERENCES

1. PAC GO-1. Programa de actualización continua de ginecología y obstetricia México; Intersistemas, 1992.

2. Sánchez-Alemán MA, Uribe-Salas F, Conde-González CJ. La infección por el virus del papiloma humano, un posible marcador biológico de comportamiento sexual en estudiantes universitarios. Salud Pública de Mex 2002; 44(5): 442-7.

3. Prendville W. Relación del virus del papiloma humano con el cáncer. Clínicas Obstétricas y Ginecológicas de Norteámerica; 1995(3). 551-60.

4. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Boletín Epidemiológico Anual 2000 y 2001. México: IMSS, 2001

5. Consejo Estatal de Población en Quintana Roo. Indicadores demográficos 2003. (En línea). http//www.qroo.gob.mx

6. Sistema Único de Información para la Vigilancia Epidemiológica. Dirección General de Epidemiología. SSA. ( En línea). http://www.dgepi.salud.gob.mx / coespo/coespo.htm

7. Heish A. The Clinical Significance of HPV. Nurse Pract 2003; 28 (10):8-18.

8. Pinto PA, Mellinger BC. VPH en el varón. Clínicas de Urología de Norteamérica, 2001(2): 841-51.

9. 9. Conzuelo QA. Papilomavirus. Nuevas alternativas en el tratamiento. 1ª ed. México: Editorial Prado, 2002. p 1-21.

10. Vargas HV. Virus del papiloma humano. Aspectos epidemiológicos, carcinogenéticos, diagnósticos y terapéuticos. Ginecol Obstet Méx 1996; (64); 411-17.

11. Trejo O, Hurtado H, Tamariz E. Atlas de Patología Cervical. 1a. Ed. México, DF: 1999. p. 15-38.

12. Apgar SB, Brotzman LG, Spitzer M. Colposcopía: principios y práctica. 1ªed. México: McGrawHill Interamerica-na, 2003. p 1-23.

13. Bekkers RL, Massuger LF, Bulten J, Melchers WJ. Epidemiological and clinical aspects of human papillomavirus detection in the prevention of cervical cancer. Rev Med Virol 2004; 14 (2): 95-105.

14. Yacobi E, Tennant C, Ferrante J, Pal N, Roetzheim R. University students’ knowledge and awareness of HPV. Prev Med 1999; 28(6): 535-41.

15. Dell DL, Chen H, Ahmad F, Stewart DE. Knowledge about human papillomavirus among adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96(5 Pr):653-6.

16. Beatty BG, O’Conell M, Ashikaga T, Cooper K. Human papillomavirus (HPV) education in middle and high schools of Vermont. J Sch Healt 2003; 73 (7): 253-7.

17. Sellors JW, et al. Prevalence and predictors of human papiloma virus infection in women in Ontario, Canada. Survey of HPV in Ontario Women (SHOW) Group CMAJ 2000; 163 (5): 503-8.

18. Svare EI, Kjaer SK, Smits HL, Poll P, Tjong A Hung SP. ter Schegget J. Risk factors for HPV detection in archival Pap smears. A population based study from Greenland and Denmark. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34(8): 1230-4.