medigraphic.com
Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2018; 92 (2)

Comparison of visual results and quality of vision after bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses

Zamora-de-la-Cruz D, Garzón M, Chávez-Mondragón E

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 75-83
PDF size: 428.71 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Purpose: To evaluate and compare visual outcomes of visual quality between bilateral implantation of a bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ReSTOR +2.50) and a trifocal IOL (PanOptix) in patients with cataract and presbyopia at Ophthalmology Institute Fundación Conde de Valenciana in Mexico City. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 24 eyes of 12 patients with ReSTOR +2.50 and PanOptix at the Ophtalmology Institute “Fundación Conde de Valenciana” in a period of 6 months. The best corrected visual acuity at different distances (distant, intermediate and near) and contrast sensitivity in photopic conditions at different frequencies were evaluated. A binocular defocus curve was obtained, and subjective visual function and quality of vision were evaluated by the VFQ-25 questionaire. Results: The far visual acuities between the two groups were acceptable in both groups, the differences in intermediate and near visual acuity were clinically and statistically significant between both IOL, these differences favored PanOptix IOL. Contrast-sensitivity values did not show noticeable differences between the two groups. VFQ-25 questionaire results for both lenses were high and showed no significant differences between them. Conclusions: Both lenses show good acceptance among patients, it seems that currently the only acceptable criteria for deciding between both lenses are patient’s vision needs and are closely related to age and current activities.


REFERENCES

  1. Dawson CR, Schwab IR. Epidemiology of cataract - a major cause of preventable blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1981;59(4):493-501.

  2. Auffarth GU, Dick HB. Multifocal intraocular lenses: a review. Ophthalmologe. 2001;98(2):127-7.

  3. Bellucci R. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16(1):33-7.

  4. Braga-Mele R, Chang D, Dewey S, et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(2):313-22.

  5. Davison JA, Simpson MJ. History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(5):849-58.

  6. Lehmann R, Waycaster C, Hileman K. A comparison of patient-reported outcomes from an apodized diffractive intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(12):2591-602.

  7. Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Ferrer-Blasco T, García-Lázaro S, Montes- Mico R. Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(11):749-54.

  8. Lee S, Choi M, Xu Z, Zhao Z, Alexander E, Liu Y. Optical bench performance of a novel trifocal intraocular lens compared with a multifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1031-8.

  9. Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Comparative visual performance with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1979-85.

  10. Hayashi K, Ogawa S, Manabe SI, Hirata A. Visual outcomes in eyes with a distance-dominant diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with low near addition power. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(11):1466-70.

  11. Hutz WW, Eckhardt HB, Rohrig B, Grolmus R. Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(12):2015-21.

  12. Hutz WW, Eckhardt HB, Rohrig B, Grolmus R. Intermediate vision and reading speed with array, Tecnis, and ReSTOR intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(3):251-6.

  13. Ji J, Huang X, Fan X, Luo M. Visual performance of Acrysof ReSTOR compared with a monofocal intraocular lens following implantation in cataract surgery. Exp Ther Med. 2013;5(1):277-81.

  14. Kohnen T, Nuijts R, Levy P, Haefliger E, Alfonso JF. Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(12):2062-9.

  15. Pieh S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability with diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(5):659-62.

  16. Mayer S, Bohm T, Haberle H, Pham DT, Wirbelauer C. [Combined implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction in cataract patients]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008; 225(9):812-7.

  17. Pedrotti E, Mastropasqua R, Passilongo M, Parisi G, Marchesoni I, Marchini G. Comparison of two multifocal intraocular lens designs that differ only in near add. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(11):754-60.

  18. Maurino V, Allan BD, Rubin GS, Bunce C, Xing W, Findl O. Quality of Vision after Bilateral Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation: A Randomized Trial - AT LISA 809M versus AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(4):700-10.

  19. Carson D, Xu Z, Alexander E, Choi M, Zhao Z, Hong X. Optical bench performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(9):1361-7.

  20. Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M. Visual function and spectacle independence after cataract surgery: bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(5):853-8.

  21. Voskresenskaya A, Pozdeyeva N, Pashtaev N, Batkov Y, Treushnicov V, Cherednik V. Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248(9):1299-306.

  22. Castillo-Gómez A, Carmona-González D, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Palomino- Bautista C, García-Feijoo J. Evaluation of image quality after implantation of 2 diffractive multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(7):1244-50.

  23. Santhiago MR, Wilson SE, Netto MV, et al. Modulation transfer function and optical quality after bilateral implantation of a +3.00 D versus a +4.00 D multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(2):215-20.

  24. Gatinel D, Loicq J. Clinically Relevant Optical Properties of Bifocal, Trifocal, and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(4):273-80.

  25. Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ. Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(4):638-48.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com