medigraphic.com

2018, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Clin Esc Med 2018; 8 (6)

Elementos antomofisiológicos del proceso de lactogénesis con trascendencia médico legal

Grettchen FS

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 45-52
PDF size: 241.32 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The structure and function of the mammary gland has a complex mechanism, which responds to physical and hormonal stimuli to ensure proper and timely feeding of thenewborn. Objective: To identify anatomopathological elements of the process of lactogenesis with forensic transcendence. Methodology: Review on the topic in the literature in English, Spanish and Portuguese, no more than 10 years of publication. The databases used were Medline, LILACS and SciELO, did not include dissertations. Conclusion: Although there are benign and malignant pathologies that can affect the normal process of lactogenesis, from the anatomical and physiological point of view there are also natural mechanisms such as congenital alterations and external mechanisms: physical, chemical and therapeutic, that can alter or injure this process, either iatrogenic effects or effects produced intentionally or non-intentionally, which could be permanent and generate some kind of disability. Due to the forensic repercussions, its correct diagnosis, differential diagnoses and etiological factors are elements that the expert should consider in cases of pathology and breast trauma.


REFERENCES

  1. Ellis H, Mahadevan V. Anatomy and physiology of the breast. Surgery 2013; 31:11-14.

  2. Hassitou F, Geddes D. Anatomy of the Human Mammary Gland: Current Status of Knowledge. Clin Anat 2013; 26(1):29-48.

  3. Jesinger RA. Breast Anatomy for the Interventionalist. Tech Vasc Interventional Rad 2014; 17(1): 3-9.

  4. Nicholson BT, Harvey JA; Cohen MA. Nipple- Areolar Complex: Normal Anatomy and Benign and Malignant Processes. RadioGraphics 2009; 29:509– 523.

  5. Javed A, Lteif A. Development of the Human Breast. Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27:5–12.

  6. Macias H, Hinck L. Mammary gland development. WIREs Dev Biol 2012; 1:533–557.

  7. Órfão A, Gouveia C. Apontamentos de anatomía e fisiologia da lactação. Rev Port Clin Geral 2009; 25:347-54.

  8. Pinho PC. Alterações mamárias - diagnóstico clínico e diferencial. Adolescência & Saúde 2010; 7(3): 27-32.

  9. Mortazavi SN, Geddes D. Lactation in the Human Breast From a Fluid Dynamics Point of View. J Biomech Eng 2017; 139(1). doi: 10.1115/1.4034995.

  10. Tezer M, Bakkaloğlu H, Ergüven M, Bilir A, Kadıoğlu A. Smooth muscle morphology in the nipple-areola complex.J Morphol Sci 2011; 28(3):171-175.

  11. Zucca G, Urban C, Vallejo A. Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts. Gland Surg 2016; 5(1):32- 36.

  12. Caouette L, Borsuk D. Congenital Anomalies of the Breast. Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27:36–41.

  13. Alcón JJ, Martínez E, Martínez E, Pont M, Lurbe E. Amastia y atelia como manifestación excepcional de la displasia ectodérmica hipohidrótica en una mujer adolescente. An Pediatr (Barc) 2008; 69(3):279-91

  14. Kachewar, S. Amazia – A case report of rare anomaly. PJR 2010; 20(4): 156-157.

  15. Rao KS. Unilateral Amazia. Indian J Surg 2015; 77(3):239–240.

  16. Mangla M, Singla D. Gestational Gigantomastia: A Systematic Review of Case Reports. Journal of Mid-Life Health 2017;8(1):40-44.

  17. Rezai S, Nakagawa JT, Tedesco J, Chadee A, Gottimukkala S, Mercado R, Henderson CE. Gestational Gigantomastia Complicating Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/892369.

  18. Sircar T., Mistry P., Harries S., Clarke D., Jones L. Seat-belt trauma of the breast in a pregnant woman causing milk-duct injury: a case report and review of the literature. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 ;92(5): W14-5. doi: 10.1308/147870810X12659688851799.

  19. Song CT, Teo I, Song C. Systematic review of seatbelt trauma to the female breast: A new diagnosis and management classification. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68(3):382-9.

  20. Warren R, Degnim AC. Uncommon Benign Breast Abnormalities in Adolescents. Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27:26–28.

  21. Kerridge WD, Kryvenko ON, Thompson A, Shah BA. Fat Necrosis of the Breast: A Pictorial Review of the Mammographic, Ultrasound, CT, and MRI Findings with Histopathologic Correlation. Radiology Research and Practice 2015; doi:10.1155/2015/613139.

  22. Hothan N, Hothan E. Drugs in breastfeeding. Aust Prescr 2015; 38(5): 156–159.

  23. Paricio JM, Díaz NM, Landa L, Sánchez M, Escrivá L. Medicamentos y lactancia materna. An Pediatr Contin 2014; 12(5):239-43.

  24. Cressman AM, Koren G, Pupco A, Kim E, Ito S, Bozzo P. Maternal cocaine use during breastfeeding. Can Fam Physician 2012; 58(11): 1218–1219.

  25. Metz TD, Stickrath EH, Marijuana Use in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Review of the Evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(6):761-78.

  26. Castilla MF. Secuelas endocrinológicas en sobrevivientes de cáncer en la edad pediátrica.Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2014; 71(3):180-187

  27. Benchat L, Mernissi FZ. Morphea on the breast and pregnancy. Pan African Medical Journal 2013; 16:22. doi:10.11604/pamj.2013.16.22.3317

  28. Bernárdez Y, Curbelo M, Cabrera G, Hernández E. Morfea mamaria. Presentación de un caso. Medisur. 2017; 15(3). Disponible en: http://www.medisur.sld. cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/3529




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com