medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2018, Number 4

<< Back

Rev Odont Mex 2018; 22 (4)

Palatal obturators in the respiratory-phono-articular system. Clinical case

Robledo CLG, Torres TJF, González CVE

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 245-249
PDF size: 340.36 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The maxillaries are the bones that provide support to the base of the skull and are essential in the sounding board for the voice production as well as the support of the muscles of the soft palate so that defects in these anatomical structures created after resection of tumors or trauma, they result in the loss of some features like phonation, swallowing, chewing, breathing, aesthetics and loss of self esteem. The soft palate is an essential element in velopharyngeal movements regulating valve and directs the transmission of sound energy and the air pressure in the oral and nasal cavities during speech, resections that this structure involves a challenge rehabilitation.


REFERENCES

  1. Beumer J, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation; Surgical and Prosthodontic Management of Cancer-Related. Acquired and Congenital Defect of the Head and Neck. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence; 2011: pp. 155-212.

  2. Nazareth CE, Faria J, Mion O, Ferreira J. Nasal valve anatomy and physiology. Braz J Otothinolaryngol. 2009; 75 (2): 305-310.

  3. Dong X, Zhy C, Qian Y, Zhang F, Jiao T. The influence of obturators on the respiration of patients with maxillary defects: a clinical study. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (5): e0127597.

  4. Qian Y, Qian H, Wu Y, Jiao T. Numeric simulation of the upper airway structure and airflow dynamic characteristics after unilateral complete maxillary resection. Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26 (3): 268-2671.

  5. González AL. La videoquimografía como parte del estudio multitest en el tratamiento de la disfonía funcional [Tesis]. España: Universidad de Murcia; 2012.

  6. Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, Huryn JM, Lerner T, Strong EW et al. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck. 1996; 18 (4): 323-334.

  7. Prada-Madrid JR, García-Venegas T, Echeverri-Brando MP, Tavera-Herrera MC. Patrones de cierre velofaringeo: estudio comparativo entre población sana y pacientes con paladar hendido. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam. 2010; 36 (4): 305-312.

  8. Kwon HB, Chang SW, Lee SH. The effect of obturator bulb height on speech in maxillectomy patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38 (3): 185-195.

  9. Yoshida H, Furuya Y, Shimodaira K, Kanazawa T, Kataoka R, Takahashi K. Spectral characteristics of hypernasality in maxillectomy patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27 (8): 723-730.

  10. de Carvalho-Teles V, Pegoraro-Krook MI, Lauris JR. Speech evaluation with and without palatal obturator in patients submitted to maxillectomy. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006; 14 (6): 421-426.

  11. Fernández-Baillo R, García-Alcántara F. Insuficiencia velofaríngea asociada a disfonía y alteración de la resonancia. Rev Logop Fon Audiol. 2001; 21 (3): 131-137. Disponible en: http://apps.elsevier.es/watermark/ctl_servlet?_f=10&pident_articulo=13153104&pident_usuario=0&pcontactid=&pident_revista=309&ty=126&accion=L&origen=zonadelectura&web=www.elsevier.es&lan=es&fichero=309v21n03a13153104pdf001.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com