medigraphic.com

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Cir 2018; 86 (3)

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for patients with early cervical cancer: Initial experience in Cancer Institute

Isla-Ortiz D, Salcedo-Hernández RA, León-Takahashi AM, Estrada-Rivera F, Barquet-Muñoz SA, Reynoso-Noverón N

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 228-236
PDF size: 564.36 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Open radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment in early stages (1A2-1B1) of uterine cervical cancer (UCC); laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) is a safe and viable option. Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of LRH in a hospital cancer care center. Method: Retrospective study that included the first 17 patients with UCC in an early stage operated with LRH in the period from April 2013 to November 2016 at the National Cancer Institute of Mexico. Results: The 17 patients were stage IB1 clinical, of which 10 (58.8%) was epidermoid subtype, 4 (23.5%) adenocarcinoma and 3 (17.6%) adenoescamoso. The mean age was 42 ± 8 years. The tumor size was 2.3 ± 0.9 cm, and in 94.1% the surgical margins were free of disease. The average operative time was 341 ± 65 minutes and blood loss of 107 ± 64 ml, no patient required blood transfusion and there was no case of conversion to open surgery. The average length of hospital stay was 2.7 days (range: 2-7 days). There were no intraope- rative or postoperative complications. Conclusions: LRH is a safe and reliable alternative for the treatment of early stage UCC.


REFERENCES

  1. Arbyn M, Autier P, Ferlay J. Burden of cervical cancer in the 27 member states of the European Union: estimates for 2004. Ann Oncol. 2007; 18:1423-5.

  2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359-86.

  3. World Health Organization. Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2014.

  4. Díaz JP, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, Zivanovic O, Brown CL, Chi DS, et al. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111:255-60.

  5. Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR, Apte SM, Campos SM, Cho KR, et al. Cervical cancer, Version 2 2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015; 13:395-404; quiz 404.

  6. Canis M, Mage G, Wattiez A, Pouly JL, Manhes H, Bruhat MA. [Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri?]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1990;19:921.

  7. Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benigno BB, Welander CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:864-5.

  8. Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, De Petrillo D, Covens A. A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:588-93.

  9. Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297-303.

  10. Naik R, Jackson KS, Lopes A, Cross P, Henry JA. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy - a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements. BJOG. 2010;117:746-51.

  11. Malur S, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer - a prospective randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:239-44.

  12. Hertel H, Kohler C, Michels W, Possover M, Tozzi R, Schneider A. Laparoscopic- assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 90:505-11.

  13. Morgan DJ, Hunter DC, McCracken G, McClelland HR, Price JH, Dobbs SP. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up. BJOG. 2007;114:537-42.

  14. Puntambekar SP, Sugoor D, Joshi G, Puntambekar SP, Kumbhare S, Sharma V, et al. Single institutional experience of 410 cases of type B & type C (Querleu Morrow classification) laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6S):S91-2.

  15. Kong TW, Chang SJ, Lee J, Paek J, Ryu HS. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:280-8.

  16. Ramírez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, Coleman RL, Levenback C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:252-5.

  17. Li G, Yan X, Shang H, Wang G, Chen L, Han Y. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 105:176-80.

  18. Yang L, Cai J, Dong W, Shen Y, Xiong Z, Wang H, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy can be routinely used for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a single-institute experience with 404 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:199-204.

  19. Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R, et al. The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:339-45.

  20. Serna E, Riaño G, Almanza L, De los Ríos J, Castañeda J, Calle G, et al. Histerectomía laparoscópica total, curva de aprendizaje: experiencia de Clínica del Prado, Medellín, Colombia. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2010;75:367-74.

  21. Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2996-9.

  22. Brummer TH, Seppala TT, Harkki PS. National learning curve for laparoscopic hysterectomy and trends in hysterectomy in Finland 2000-2005. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:840-5.

  23. Mäkinen J, Johansson J, Tomás C, Tomás E, Heinonen PK, Laatikainen T, et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1473-8.

  24. Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG. Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:777-9.

  25. Pareja R, Nick AM, Schmeler KM, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Buitrago CA, et al. Quality of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in developing countries: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between a comprehensive cancer center in the United States and a cancer center in Colombia. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:326-9.

  26. Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C, et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:584-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com