2018, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2018; 32 (3)
Dedifferentiated diaphyseal juxtacortical osteosarcoma of ulna with metastasis to the lung
Clara-Altamirano MA, García-Ortega DY, Maciel-Miranda A, Martínez-Said H, Martínez-Tlahuel JL, Caro-Sánchez CHS, García-Ruíz GC, Cuellar-Hubbe M
Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 167-171
PDF size: 219.87 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma is a variant in which a high grade osteosarcoma coexists with a parosteal osteosarcoma. We report the case of a 20-year-old female patient who presented with six months of evolution of pain and functional limitation of the right forearm, with no apparent cause; radiographs were performed, observing a tumoral lesion in the diaphysis of the right ulna. Physical examination showed pain upon palpation in the diaphysis of the ulna and limitation of prone-supination. Axial computed tomography of the thorax revealed metastatic disease in the upper lobe of the left lung. An incisional biopsy was performed on the right ulna, with a report of dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. Therefore, the patient was managed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin until completing three cycles. Surgical treatment consisted of intercalary resection of the diaphysis of the right ulna, plus reconstruction of the microvascularized autologous graft of the right fibular diaphysis and graft stabilization with 3.5 mm dynamic compression plate (DCP) and one-third tubular plate. In the same procedure, pulmonary metastasectomy was performed by thoracoscopy. Post-surgical histopathological report with 100% necrosis. Currently, the patient is asymptomatic, with no evidence of tumor activity. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma is a rare pathology, but should be suspected as a differential diagnosis in the presence of a parosteal osteosarcoma; it should be taken into account that this disease can metastasize due to its dedifferentiated pattern. It is important to plan a surgical treatment that allows an adequate functional reconstruction, always taking into account the oncological principle.
REFERENCES
Petrilli AS, de Camargo B, Filho VO, Bruniera P, Brunetto AL, Jesus-Garcia R, et al. Results of the Brazilian Osteosarcoma Treatment Group Studies III and IV: prognostic factors and impact on survival. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(7): 1161-8.
Bacci G, Longhi A, Versari M, Mercuri M, Briccoli A, Picci P. Prognostic factors for osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 15-year experience in 789 patients treated at a single institution. Cancer. 2006; 106(5): 1154-61.
Arslan HS, Aydin O, Dervışoğlu S, Oksüz DC, Kantarci F, Hiz M, et al. Low-grade osteosarcoma, review of 15 cases in a series of 156 osteosarcoma cases. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2011; 27(2): 138-43.
Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Staals EL, Davidovitz P. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma: the experience of the Rizzoli Institute. Cancer. 2005; 103(11): 2373-82.
Van der Spuy DJ, Vlok GJ. Osteosarcoma: pathology, staging and management. SA Orthop J. 2009; 8(3): 69-78.
Schwab JH, Antonescu CR, Athanasian EA, Boland PJ, Healey JH, Morris CD. A comparison of intramedullary and juxtacortical low-grade osteogenic sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(6): 1318-22.
Wold LE, Unni KK, Beabout JW, Sim FH, Dahlin DC. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(1): 53-9.
Van Oven MW, Molenaar WM, Freling NJ, Schraffordt Koops H, Muis N, Dam-Meiring A, et al. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma of the femur with aneuploidy and lung metastases. Cancer. 1989; 63(4): 807-11.
Okada K, Frassica FJ, Sim FH, Beabout JW, Bond JR, Unni KK. Parosteal osteosarcoma. A clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76(3): 366-78.
Sheth DS, Yasko AW, Raymond AK, Ayala AG, Carrasco CH, Benjamin RS, et al. Conventional and dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Cancer. 1996; 78(10): 2136-45.
Huvos AG. Osteoblastoma. In: Huvos AG. Bone tumors: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1991. pp. 67-83.
Zelenski N, Brigman BE, Levin LS, Erdmann D, Eward WC. The vascularized fibular graft in the pediatric upper extremity: a durable, biological solution to large oncologic defects. Sarcoma. 2013; 2013: 321201.
Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 55(5): 533-44.
Weiland AJ, Moore JR, Daniel RK. Vascularized bone autografts. Experience with 41 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (174): 87-95.
Weiland AJ. Current concepts review: vascularized free bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981; 63(1): 166-9.
Weiland AJ, Daniel RK, Riley LH Jr. Application of the free vascularized bone graft in the treatment of malignant or aggressive bone tumors. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1977; 140(3): 85-96.
Weiland AJ, Daniel RK. Microvascular anastomoses for bone grafts in the treatment of massive defects in bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61(1): 98-104.
Weiland AJ, Daniel RK. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: treatment with vascularized autogenous fibular grafts. A preliminary report. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1980; 147(3): 89-95.
Gao YH, Ketch LL, Eladoumikdachi F, Netscher DT. Upper limb salvage with microvascular bone transfer for major long-bone segmental tumor resections. Ann Plast Surg. 2001; 47(3): 240-6.
Murray PM. Free vascularized bone transfer in limb salvage surgery of the upper extremity. Hand Clin. 2004; 20(2): vi, 203-11.