medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica

Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Dermatológica y Oncológica, AC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica 2018; 16 (2)

Actinomycetomas in Chiapas. A Report of 15 Cases at Centro Dermatológico del Sureste Dr. Fernando Latapí

López VF, Aquino FC, Aquino JMÁ, Palafox VG, Farrera EF, Arenas GR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 116-122
PDF size: 210.30 Kb.


Key words:

mycetoma, actinomycetoma, Nocardia.

ABSTRACT

Background: mycetoma is a chronic granulomatous infection due to actynomicetes and fungi. Nocardia brasiliensis is the most common isolated causal agent in México. Treatment is based on dapsone and trimethoprim sulfametoxazol.
Objective: to report sociodemographic situation, clinical features and microbiological aspects of patients affected by mycetoma in the state of Chiapas.
Methodology: a retrospective and observational study was performed at Centro Dermatológico del Sureste Dr. Fernando Latapí, in the city of Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, from 1997 to 2017.
Results: in 20 years we found 15 cases of mycetoma. Nocardia spp. was identified in 86% and Actinomadura madurae in 14%. Male and female ratio was 4:1, age ranged from 15 to 70 years with a average age of 27.5 years. Trunk and legs where equally affected in 46% of the cases. Evolution ranged from five months to 15 years.
Discussion: in Chiapas, mycetoma is caused mainly by Nocardia spp. (86%) and Actinomadura (14%) and usually affects trunk and lower limbs. Treatment of choice is dapsone plus trimetroprim sulfametoxasol, and in five cases norfloxacin was added with good results.


REFERENCES

  1. Padilla M, Caballero A y Martínez E, Micetoma por Nocardia brasiliensis en región abdominal, Rev Cent Dermatol Pascua 2014; 23(1):17-21.

  2. Torres E, Vásquez E y Moreno G, Micetomas actinomicéticos. Resultados terapéuticos en 15 casos, Dermatología Rev Mex 2008; 52(2):65-9.

  3. Welsh O, Al Abdely H, Salinas-Carmona M et al., Mycetoma medical therapy, plos Negl Trop Dis 2014; 8(10):e3218.

  4. Arenas R. Micología médica ilustrada, México, McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2016.

  5. Mohamed HT, Fahal A y Van de Sade, Mycetoma: epidemiology, treatment challengues, and progress, Res and Rep in Tro Med 2015; 6:31-6.

  6. Hernández-Bel P, Mayorga J y Pérez M E, Actinomicetoma por Nocardia brasiliensis, An Pediatr 2010; 73(4):213-4.

  7. López R, Méndez L y Bonifaz A, Actualización de la epidemiología del micetoma en México. Revisión de 3 933 casos, Gaceta Médica de México 2013; 149:586-92.

  8. Bonifaz A, Tirado-Sánchez A, Calderón L, Saúl A et al., Mycetoma: experience of 482 cases in a single center in Mexico, plos Negl Trop Dis 2014; 8(8):e3102.

  9. Sánchez-Cárdenas C, García-Abundis M, Ruiz J et al., Actinomicetomas por Nocardia spp. Informe de 8 casos en Izúcar de Matamoros, Puebla, Dermatología cmq 2017; 15(3):162-7.

  10. Jérez R y Schafer F, Micetoma actinomicético por Actinomadura madurae, Rev Chil Infectol 2012; 29(4):459-63.

  11. inegi. Clima. Chiapas 2018.

  12. López-Zaldo JB, Hernandez-Ortega AP, Arias-Amaral J et al., Micetoma abdominal, manifestación inusual tratada con imipenem y amikacina, Med Int Mex 2013; 29:436-41.

  13. Machado A, Una década de micología en el Centro Dermatológico de Yucatán, Dermatología cmq 2012; 10(1):6-7.

  14. Sánchez C, García MI, Ruiz J et al., Actinomicetomas por Nocardia spp. Informe de ocho casos en Izúcar de Matamoros, Puebla, Dermatología cmq 2017; 15(3):162-7.

  15. Welsh O, Mycetoma, Clinics in Dermatology 2007; 25:195-202.

  16. Kumar J, Kumar A, Sethy P et al., A dot-in-circle sign of mycetoma in mri, Diagn Interv Radiol 2007; 3:193-5.

  17. Palit A, Ragunatha S e Inamadar A, Actinomycetoma: dramatic response to modified two-step regimen, Int J Dermatol 2011; 50:446-9.

  18. Bonifaz A, Vázquez-González D y Perusquía-Ortiz A, Subcutaneous mycoses: chromoblastomycosis, sporotrichosis and mycetoma, J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2010; 8(8):619-27.

  19. Hassan A, Management of mycetoma, Expert Rev Dematol 2010; 5(1):1-7.

  20. Gómez A, Welsh O y Said S, In vitro and in vivo activities of antimicrobials against Nocardia brasiliensis, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48(3):832-7.

  21. Schalberg R, Fisher M, Hanson K et al., Suceptibility profiles of Nocardia isolates based on current taxonomy, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:795-800.

  22. Welsh O, Vera-Cabrera L, Welsh E et al., Actinomycetoma and advances in its treatment, Clin Dermatol 2012; 30(4):372-81.

  23. Chacón-Moreno BE, Welsh O, Cavazos-Rocha N et al., Efficacy of ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin against Nocardia brasiliensis in vitro and in an experimental model of actinomycetoma in balb/c mice, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53(1):295-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica. 2018;16