medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2018; 41 (2)

Internal and inter-rater reliability of the ASQ-3 in Mexican preschoolers

Ortiz-León S, Granados-Rojas A, Cavazos-Olivo J, De Benito-Avendaño L, Obregón-García VH, Duran-Avendaño XM, Ramírez-Pérez RV, Cárdenas-Medina JA, Vargas-Terréz BE, Luna-Guevara G, Rodríguez-Machain AC, Jaimes-Medrano AL

Language: English
References: 35
Page: 62-72
PDF size: 361.67 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction. Monitoring child development includes the promotion of development in the healthy child and the detection of delays and early indicators of disorders that begin in the first five years of life through easy-touse, easy to mark, and low-cost screening tests. Objective. To evaluate the internal reliability and inter-rater reliability of the ASQ-3 in Mexican preschool children. Method. The ASQ-3 was applied to parents and/or teachers of 33 - 60 month old children who attended the Centros de Desarrollo Infantil (Child Development Centers-CENDIS) in the public and private sectors of Mexico City. Results. A total of n = 1052 questionnaires were obtained, grouped into six age groups (33, 36, 42, 48, 54, and 60 months of age) according to the Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ-3). The levels of reliability of the ASQ-3 for each of the age groups were acceptable, with a range of α = .77 to α = .88. Regarding inter-rater reliability (parents vs. teachers), moderate correlation levels were observed. Discussion and conclusion. The results obtained suggest that this is a screening instrument that reliably evaluates the five areas of development that make up the ASQ-3 in pre-school children. This represents an opportunity to continue studying the psychometric characteristics of validity of this instrument in representative samples of Mexican children to optimize the process of early childhood development monitoring.


REFERENCES

  1. Anastasi, A. (1981). Capacitación, avance de las pruebas y capacidades desarrolladas. American Psychologist, 36, 1086-1093.

  2. Atalah, S. E., Cordero, V. M., Guerra, Z. M., Quezada, L. S., Carrasco, F. X., & Romo, M. M. (2014). Monitoreo de los indicadores del Programa “Chile Crece Contigo” 2008-2011. Revista chilena de pediatría, 85(5), 569-577. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062014000500007

  3. Bedregal, P. (2014). Hacia la renovación en las políticas de infancia en Chile. Revista Chilena de Pediatría, 85(1), 7-11. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062014000100001

  4. Bright Futures Steering Committee & Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. (2006). Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics, 118(1), 405- 419. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1231

  5. Charafeddine, L., Sinno, D., Ammous, F., Yassin, W., Al-Shaar, L., & Mikati, M. A. (2013). Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Adaptation to an Arabic speaking population and cultural sensitivity. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 17(5), 471-478. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.03.001

  6. Dionne, C., McKinnon, S., Squires, J., & Clifford, J. (2014). Developmental screening in a Canadian First Nation (Mohawk): psychometric properties and adaptations of ages & stages questionnaires. BMC Pediatrics, 14(1), 23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-23

  7. Figueiras, A., de Souza, I. C. N., Ríos, V. G., & Benguigui, Y. (2006). Manual para la Vigilancia del Desarrollo Infantil en el contexto de AIEPI. Retrieved from: http://www1.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/manual-vigilancia-desarrollo-infantil- aiepi-2011.pdf

  8. Filgueiras, A., Pires, P., Maissonette, S., & Landeira-Fernandez, J. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Brazilian-adapted version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire in public child daycare centers. Early human development, 89(8), 561- 576. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.02.005

  9. Ga, H. Y., & Kwon, J. Y. (2011). A comparison of the Korean ages and stages questionnaires and Denver developmental delay screening test. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(3), 369-374. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.369

  10. Glascoe, F. P. (2000). Evidence‐based approach to developmental and behavioral surveillance using parent’s concerns. Child: Care, Health and Development, 26(2), 137-149. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00173.x

  11. Heckman, J. (2011). Policies to foster human capital. Educational Studies, 3, 73-137. doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2011-3-73-137

  12. Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. The American Economic Review, 103(6), 2052-2086. doi: 10.1257/ aer.103.6.2052

  13. Hornman, J., Kerstjens, J. M., de Winter, A. F., Bos, A. F., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2013). Validity and internal consistency of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 60-month version and the effect of three scoring methods. Early Human Development, 89(12), 1011-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.08.016

  14. Houwen, S., Visser, L., van der Putten, A., & Vlaskamp, C. (2016). The interrelationships between motor, cognitive, and language development in children with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 53, 19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.01.012

  15. Hutchson, T., & Nicoll, A. (1988). Developmental screening and surveillance. British journal of Hospital Medicine, 39(1), 22-9.

  16. Jee, S. H., Szilagyi, M., Ovenshire, C., Norton, A., Conn, A. M., Blumkin, A., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2010). Improved detection of developmental delays among young children in foster care. Pediatrics, 125(2), 282-289.

  17. Juneja, M., Mohanty, M., Jain, R., & Ramji, S. (2012). Ages and Stages Questionnaire as a screening tool for developmental delay in Indian children. Indian Pediatrics, 49(6), 457-461. doi: 10.1007/s13312-012-0074-9

  18. Kerlinger, F. N., Lee, H. B., Pineda, L. E., & Mora, M. I. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento. México: Mc Graw-Hill.

  19. Kerstjens, J. M., Bos, A. F., ten Vergert, E. M., de Meer, G., Butcher, P. R., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2009). Support for the global feasibility of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire as developmental screener. Early Human Development, 85(7), 443-447. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.03.001

  20. Narbona, J., E., & Schlumberger, E. (2008). Retraso Psicomotor. Asociación Española de Pediatría, 21, 152-157. Retrieved from: https://www.aeped.es/sites/ default/files/documentos/21-retraso.pdf

  21. Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2001). Clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud. Informe de la Secretaría. Retrieved from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/82187/1/sa5418.pdf

  22. Pick, S., & López, A. (1994). Cómo investigar en ciencias sociales. México: Trillas.

  23. Piek, J. P., Dawson, L., Smith, L. M., & Gasson, N. (2008). The role of early fine and gross motor development on later motor and cognitive ability. Human Movement Science, 27(5), 668-681. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.11.002

  24. Pomés, M., Squires, J., & Yovanoff, P. (2016). Psychometric examination of a Spanish translation of a developmental screening instrument. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 14(2), 132-145. doi: 10.1177/1476718X14529279

  25. Rizzoli-Córdoba, A., Schnaas-Arrieta, L., Liendo-Vallejos, S., Buenrostro-Márquez, G., Romo-Pardo, B., Carreón-García, J., …Robles-Anaya, R. (2013). Validación de un instrumento para la detección oportuna de problemas de desarrollo en menores de 5 años en México. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México, 70(3), 195-208.

  26. Romero, A. O., Grañana, N., Gaeto, N., Torres, M. L. Á., Zamblera, M. N., Vasconez, M. A., ... & Squires, J. (2018). ASQ-3: Validation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire for the detection of neurodevelopmental disorders in Argentine children. Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría, 116(1), 7-13.

  27. Ruiz, G. A. A., Vázquez, R. I. M., & Sánchez, C. (2013). Modelo de vigilancia y seguimiento del neurodesarrollo infantil: experiencia en la Clínica de Medicina Familiar Tlalpan. Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas, 18(1), 19-30.

  28. San Antonio, M. C., Fenick, A. M., Shabanova, V., Leventhal, J. M., & Weitzman, C. C. (2014). Developmental screening using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: standardized versus real-world conditions. Infants & Young Children, 27(2), 111-119. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0000000000000005

  29. Squires, J. & Bricker, D. (2009). Ages and Stages Questionnaires: A Parent-Completed, Child-Monitoring System (3rd ed.) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

  30. Squires, J., Bricker, D., & Potter, L. (1997). Revision of a parent-completed developmental screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22(3), 313-328. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/22.3.313

  31. Secretaría de Salud. (1999). Norma Oficial Mexicana para la Atención a la Salud del Niño. México, D.F. Retrieved from: http://www.ucol.mx/content/cms/13/file/ NOM/NOM_031_SSA2.pdf

  32. Vameghi, R., Sajedi, F., Kraskian, M. A., Habiollahi, A., Lornezhad, H. R., & Delavar., B. (2013). Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Standardization of Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) in Iranian Children Iranian. Journal of Public Health, 42(5), 522-528.

  33. Velikonja, T., Edbrooke‐Childs, J., Calderon, A., Sleed, M., Brown, A., & Deighton, J. (2016). The psychometric properties of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires for ages 2‐2.5: a systematic review. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1111/cch.12397

  34. Walker, S. P., Wachs, T. D., Grantham-McGregor, S., Black, M. M., Nelson, C. A., Huffman, S. L., … Gardner, J. M. M. (2011). Inequality in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development. The Lancet, 378(9799), 1325-1338. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60555-2

  35. Wang, M. V., Lekhal, R., Aarø, L. E., & Schjølberg, S. (2014). Co‐occurring development of early childhood communication and motor skills: results from a population‐ based longitudinal study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40(1), 77-84. doi: 10.1111/cch.12003




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com