Villeda-Sandoval CI, Almeida-Magaña R, Martínez-Salas AJ, Pacheco-Hernández MÁ, Orozco-Lara JC

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 155-161
PDF size: 486.37 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: Robotic-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion is a complex procedure that has shown similar oncologic and functionalresults to those with the open technique. It has not been widely performed
Clinic case: A retrospective review was conducted on 3 patients that underwent radical cystectomy in our robotic surgery program within the time frame of March and May 2017. Two intracorporeal neobladders and 1 intracorporeal ileal conduit were formed in patients that were 49, 45, and 70 years of age, respectively. One patient required transfusion with one unit of packed red blood cells and another patient presented with a urinary tract infection that required hospitalization. Surgery duration in the respective three cases was 540, 570, and 480 minutes and postoperative hospital stay was 6, 8, and 5 days.
Conclusions: In our present first case series of patients that underwent robotic-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion, the complications were acceptable and oncologic and functional control was adequate, demonstrating its feasible use in our medical environment.

REFERENCES

1. Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R, et al. Treatment of Non- Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ ASTRO/SUO Guideline. J Urol 2017;198(3):552–559.

2. Fairey AS, Jacobsen NEB, Chetner MP, et al. Associations Between Comorbidity, and Overall Survival and Bladder Cancer Specific Survival After Radical Cystectomy: Results From the Alberta Urology Institute Radical Cystectomy Database. J Urol 2009;182(1):85–93.

3. Sandberg JM, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with complete intracorporeal urinary diversion. Asian J Urol 2016;3(3):156–166.

4. Chan KG, Guru K, Wiklund P, et al. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technical Recommendations from the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 2015;67(3):423–431.

5. Romero-gonzález RJ, López-verdugo JF, Camacho-trejo V, et al. Cistoprostatectomía radical laparoscópica asistida con robot y creación de vejiga ortotópica totalmente intraabdominal. Experiencia inicial en México. Cir Cir. 2011;468–72.

6. Greene FL, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekend C, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual. ed. 7. Philadelphia, PA: Springer; 2009

7. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, et al. Defining Early Morbidity of Radical Cystectomy for Patients with Bladder Cancer Using a Standardized Reporting Methodology. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):164–176.

8. Hosseini A, Adding C, Nilsson A et al. Robotic cystectomy: surgical technique. BJU Int 2011;108(6):962–968.

9. Gill IS, Fergany A, Klein EA, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 2 cases. Urology 2000;56(1):26–29.

10. Gill IS, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and continent orthotopic ileal neobladder performed completely intracorporeally: the initial experience. J Urol 2002;168(1):13–18.

11. Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol 2003;44(3):337–339.

12. Gandaglia G, Karl A, Novara G, et al. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients: A comparison of two high-volume referral centers. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42(11):1736–1743.

13. Li K, Lin T, Fan X, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting early outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy. Cancer Treat Rev 2013;39(6):551–560.

14. Koppie TM, Vickers AJ, Vora K, et al. Standardization of pelvic lymphadenectomy performed at radical cystectomy. Cancer 2006;107(10):2368–2374.

15. Lamb BW, Tan WS, Eneje P, et al. Benefits of robotic cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion for patients with low cardiorespiratory fitness: A prospective cohort study. Urol Oncol 2016;34(9):17-23.

16. Ahmed K, Khan SA, Hayn MH, et al. Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol 2014;65(2):340–347.

17. Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD, et al. Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol 2015;67(6):1042–1050.

18. Asimakopoulos AD, Campagna A, Gakis G, et al. Nerve Sparing, Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Bladder Substitution in the Male. J Urol 2016;196(5):1549–1557.

19. Goldberg H, Baniel J, Mano R, et al. Orthotopic neobladder vs. ileal conduit urinary diversion: A long-term quality-oflife comparison. Urol Oncol 2016;34(3):1-7.

20. Koupparis A, Villeda-Sandoval C, Weale N, et al. Robotassisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: impact on an established enhanced recovery protocol. BJU Int 2015;116(6):924–931.

21. Palleschi G, Pastore AL, Ripoli A, et al. Videourodynamic evaluation of intracorporeally reconstructed orthotopic U-shaped ileal neobladders. Urology 2015;85(4):883–889.