Ortiz CAB, López NJC

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 57-65
PDF size: 522.88 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Reconstruction of the alveolar ridge through osteogenic distraction may be indicated for the atrophic alveolar process resulting from maxillofacial trauma, periodontal diseases and pathological or congenital deformities. Therefore, alveolar distraction osteogenesis is another strategy to obtain a favorable alveolar shape for rehabilitation with dental implants, aiming to gain height, anteroposterior length, and sometimes width. The principle of osteogenic distraction, derived from the orthopaedist Ilizarov, has been demonstrated for alveolar modification. The alveolar bone can be distracted in all directions to gain height and thickness. The osteogenic distraction to reconstruct the poor alveolar crest is a predictable technique that allows the regeneration of soft and hard tissues, to place implants in an ideal situation that will satisfy the current prosthetic rehabilitation, both aesthetically and functionally. However the treatment plan should be a combination of disciplines: prosthesis, orthodontics and surgery.

REFERENCES

1. Bell William, Guerrero César. Distracción osteogénica del esqueleto facial. Amolca; 2009. pp. 70-74.

2. Shukla A, Singh SV, Kumar S, Mehrotra D, Mohammad S, Singh S. Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial. J Oral Biol Craniofac. 2012; 2 (1): 25-29.

3. Ugurlu F, Sener BC, Dergin G, Garip H. Potential complications and precautions in vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a retrospective study of 40 patients. J Craniomaxillofaci Surg. 2013; 41 (7): 569-573.

4. Jensen OT, Cockrell R, Kuhike L, Reed C. Anterior maxillary alveolar distraction osteogenesis a prospective 5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17 (1): 52-68.

5. Jensen OT, Block M. Alveolar modification by distraction osteogenesis. Atlas oral and maxilofacial. Surg Clin N Am. 2008; 16: 185-214.

6. Faysal U, Cem SB, Atilla S. Effects of different consolidation period son bone formation and implant success in alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013; 41 (13): 194-197.

7. Garcia GA, Somza MM, Gandara VP, Lopez MJ. Alvevolar ridge osteogenesis using 2 intraosseous distractors: uniform and non uniform distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60 (12): 1510-1512.

8. Verlinden C, Van de Vijfeken SE, Tuinzing DB, Becking AG, Swennen GR. Complications of mandibular distraction osteognesis for acquired deformities: a systematic review of the literatura. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44 (8): 956-964.

9. Cope J, Samchukov M, Cherkashin A. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a historic perspective future directions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115 (4): 448-460.

10. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1989; 238: 249-290.

11. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1989; 239: 263-285.

12. Yin X, Zhang C, Hze-Khoong EP, Wang Y, Xu L. Influence of periosteal coverage on distraction osteogenesis with dental implant distractors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72 (10): 1921-1927.

13. Ooi K, Inoue N, Okada T, Matsushita K, Totsuka Y. Posterior maxillary alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis by bi-directional distractor. Oral Science International. 2013; 10 (2): 95-99.

14. Yoshimoto Y, Nakajima M, Kubo H, Kakudo K, Sugitatsu M, Yamamoto H. Effects of distraction osteogenesis on the inferior alveolar nerve of the cat mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho. 2013; 25 (3): 201-204.

15. Menezes DJ, Shibli JA, Gehrke SA, Beder AM, Sendyk WR. Effect of platelet-rich plasma in alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 54 (1): 83-87.