medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Boletín del Colegio Mexicano de Urología

Órgano Oficial de el Colegio Mexicano de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 3

<< Back

Bol Col Mex Urol 2006; 21 (3)

Dispositivo intrauterino insertado en la vejiga. Informe de un caso

Sánchez LA, Sepúlveda BA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 99-101
PDF size: 477.53 Kb.


Key words:

Intrauterine device, cistolithotripsy, bladder stone.

ABSTRACT

Intrauterine device has wide acceptance as a no definitive method of natal control and it uses with more frequency. Despite its easiness of instalation, the personal in charge to that meanly in rural countries sometimes have not enough knowledge for that. We presented the case of 37 year old woman wich was installed an intrauterine device inside urinary bladder with subsecuent pregnancy at 2 months and 13 years later presented to our service with urinary tract infections of large data and with studies it was found intrauterine device inside urinary bladder, and was resolved with cistolithotripsy and endoscopic extraction.


REFERENCES

  1. Urbina-Fuentes M, Palma-Cabrera J, Gómez CA. El impacto de la planificación familiar en algunos indicadores del bienestar social. Gac Med Méx 1991; 127: 153-61.

  2. Urbina FM. Planificación Familiar. En: Soberón G, Kumate J, Laguna J, (Comps.). La salud en México. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1988, p. 136-55.

  3. Bromham DR. Intrauterine contraceptive devices-a reappraisal. Br Med Bull 1993; 49: 100-23.

  4. Broateng J, Chi IC, Jones DB. An evaluation of six new intrauterine devices. Contracept 1994; 10: 57-70.

  5. Chi I. What we have learned from recent IUD studies: a researcher’s perspective. Contracept 1993; 48: 81-108.

  6. Rivera R, Chi IC, Farr G. The intrauterine device in the present and future. Curr Opin Gynecol 1993; 5: 829-32.

  7. Janeiros, Salas, et al. Desplazamiento intravesical de un dispositivo intrauterino. Informe de un caso y revisión bibliográfica. Bol Col Méx Urol 1996; 13: 133.

  8. Castro BJ, et al. Migración de dispositivo intrauterino a la vejiga. Comunicación de un caso. Rev Méx Urol 1995; 55(6): 116-19.

  9. Yalein V, Denurkesen O, Alici B, Onol B, Solok V. An unusual presentation of a foreign body in the urinary bladder: a migrant intrauterine device. Urol Int 1998; 61(4): 240-2.

  10. 10.Hernández VM, Carrillo PA. Dispositivo Intrauterino Traslocado (Intravesical) Informe de un caso. Gin Obs Méx 1998; 66(7): 290-2.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Bol Col Mex Urol. 2006;21