2016, Number 4
Next >>
Arch Neurocien 2016; 21 (4)
BRIEF-A (short): Analysis psychometric properties in a Spanish sample
Basuela HE
Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 6-15
PDF size: 180.52 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: BRIEF-A is a questionnaire that allows to assess executive function
in adult population from the perspective of autoinforme and heteroinforme. It is a
test extensively used in neuropsychology, no however, there is not date normative
to Spanish population policy. It is constituted by ten scales that allow having a vision
multidimensional construct executive function. Factor analysis models have allowed
us to deepen its structure.
Objective: Analyze the psychometric properties of the BRIEF-A (abbreviated form)
in a sample of Spanish. Methodology. No experimental or ex post facto. Subjects. 66
subjects have participated.
Analysisof the data: Factorial analysis.
Results: We found a high internal consistency (Cronbach α of .841). Through the
method of analysis with exploratory Factorial we found main factors, we have
several structures:
i.two factors that explain the variance of 35.3%.
ii.44.62% of the three factors that explain the correlation structure of the original
variables.
iii.Four factors that explain the 52.81% of the correlation structure of the original
variables.
Conclusions: The results indicate that the dimensions that make up the functioning
of the executive with the independence of the number of factors, these dimensions
can grouped in relation to two major areas: hot versus cold in terms of emotional
components versus processing information components.
REFERENCES
1.Tirapu J, García A, Ríos M, Ardila A. (Eds.). Neuropsicología del córtex prefrontal y de las funciones ejecutivas. Barcelona. Editorial Viguera. 2011.
2.Wiebe SA, Sheffield T, Nelson JM, Clark CA, Chevalier N, Espy KA. The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds. J Exp Child Psychol 2011; 108: 436–52. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008
3.Willoughby MT, Blair CB, Wirth RJ, Greenberg M. The measurement of executive function at age 3 years: Psychometric properties and criterion validity of a new battery of tasks. Psychol Assess 2010; 22, 306–17. doi:10.1037/a0018708
4.Miller MR, Giesbrecht GF, Müller U, McInerney RJ, Kerns, KA. A latent variable approach to determining the structure of executive function in preschool children. J Cogn Dev 2012; 13: 395–423. doi:10.1080/1524837 2.2011.585478
5.van der Ven SH, Kroesbergen EH, Boom J, Leseman PP. The structure of executive functions in children: A closer examination of inhibition, shifting, and updating. Br J Dev Psychol 2013; 31: 70–87. doi:10.1111/j.2044- 835X.2012.02079.x
6.Wasserman T, Wasserman LD. Toward an integrated model of executive functioning in children. Appl Neuropsychol Child 2013; 2: 88–96. doi:10.1080/21622965.2013.748394
7.Miyake A, Friedman NP, Rettinger DA, Shah P, Hegarty M. How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 2011; 130: 621−40. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621
8.Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howeter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. J Cogn Psychol 2000; 27: 1022-32. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
9.Busch RM, McBride A, Curtiss G, Vanderploeg RD. The components of executive functioning in traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2005; 27(8): 1022-32. doi: 10.1080/13803390490919263
10.Ríos M, Muñoz JM. La atención y el control ejecutivo después de un TCE. Madrid: Fundación Mafre Medicina; 2004.
11.Lehto JE, Juujärvi P, Kooistra L, Pulkkinen L. Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. Br J Dev Psychol 2003; 21: 59–80. doi: 10.1348/026151003321164627
12.The International Test Commission. International guidelines on computer based and internet delivered testing. International Journal of Testing 2006; 6; 143–71. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4
13.Mulder H, Hoofs H, Verhagen J, van der Veen I, Leseman P. Psychometric properties and convergent and predictive validity of an executive function test battery for two-year-olds. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 733. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00733
14.Cardoso C. Metodología para la adaptación de instrumentos de evaluación. Fisioter 2010; 32(6):264–70. doi:10.1016/j.ft.2010.05.001
15.Roth RM, Isquith PK, Gioia GA. Behavior rating inventory of executive function—adult version: professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2005.
16.Chan R, Shum D, Toulopoulou T, Chen E. Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2008; 23: 201-16. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010
17.Lee K, Bull R, Ho RMH. Developmental changes in executive functioning. Child Dev 2013; 84: 1933–53. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12096
18.Lerner MD, Lonigan CJ. Executive Function Among Preschool Children: Unitary Versus Distinct Abilitie. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2014; 36: 626–39. doi: 10.1007/s10862-014-9424-3
19.Schoemaker K, Bunte T, Wiebe SA, Espy KA, Dekovic M, Matthys W. Executive function deficits in preschool children with ADHD and DBD. J Child Psychol and Psychiatry 2012; 53: 111–19. doi:10.1111/j.1469- 7610.2011.02468.x
20.Brauer K, Pontón MO, Gorsuch RL, González JJ, Millerd BL. Factor analysis of four measures of prefrontal lobe functioning. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998; 13 (7): 585–595.
21.Spiess MA, Meier B, Roebers CM. Development and longitudinal relationships between children’s executive functions, prospective memory, and metacognition. Cogn Dev 2016; 38:99–113. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.02.003
22.Egeland J, Fallmyr O. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF): Support for a distinction between emotional and behavioral regulation. Child Neuropsychol 2010; 16:326-37. doi: 10.1080/09297041003601462
23.Manga D, Ramos F. Batería de evaluación neuropsicológica de adultos Luria-DNA. Madrid: TEA; 2000.