López CO, Viveros CC

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 44-47
PDF size: 48.98 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective. The mean objective of this study was to evaluate efficiency the free tension suburethal slig technique for urinary stress incontinence. Methods. The technique was applied on 22 women diagnosed with urinary stress incontinence and the results were evaluated at 2, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results. Average age was 58.4 years old (range 39-69 years). The average operative time was 37.5 minutes. The average transoperative bleeding was 50 cc. At 2 and 6 monts respectively 81.8 % and 90.8% patients were free of urinary stress incontinence. At 12 months 90.8% still remained free of urinary stress incontinence. Conclusion. The free tension suburethral sling technique with polypropylene for urinary stress incontinence renders a high success rate. It is a the procedure safe, efficient, inexpensive, easily applied, and with minimum complications.

REFERENCES

1. Briones MG, Jimenez CM. Tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo femenina con el sistema TVT (Tension Free Vaginal Tape): nuestra experiencia. Actas Urol Esp 2001; 25(6): 423-9.

2. García FP, Perez SG. Manejo quirúrgico y complicaciones de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo: nuestra experiencia en 385 pacientes operados en los últimos 25 años. Actas Urol Esp 2003; 27(2): 92-6.

3. Kuo HK, Chorng Q. Anatomical and functional results of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 2001; 166(1): 152-7.

4. Jimenez CJ, Hualde AA. TVT 3 años de experiencia. Actas Urol Esp 2004; 28(1): 1320.

5. Trabucco AF, Bilttein JM. A novel composite sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: first clinical experience. J Pelv Med Surg 2004; 10(2): 63-70.

6. Walters MD, Daneshgary F. Surgical management of stress urinary incontinence. Clin Obstet Gyn 2004; 47(1): 93-103.

7. Bemelmans B, Chapple R. Are sling the gold standar treatment for the management of female urinary stress incontinence and if so which technique? Urogynaecology 2003; 13(4): 301-7.

8. Gonzalez EE, Lujan M. Análisis comparativo de complicaciones entre las diferentes técnicas empleadas para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo. Actas Urol Esp 2002; 23(5): 322-9.

9. Castillo PS, Sánchez R. El uso de malla de prolene en el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo. Actas Urol Esp 2003; 19(3): 162-7.

10. Kobashi KC, Govier F. Preoperative complications: the first 140 polypropylene pubovaginal sling. J Urol 2003; 170(5):1918-21.