medigraphic.com
ISSN 1527-3172 (Electronic)

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

MEDICC Review 2017; 19 (4)

Health workers’ perceived challenges for dengue prevention and control in the Dominican Republic

Veras-Estévez BA, Chapman HJ

Language: English
References: 47
Page: 26-34
PDF size: 126.67 Kb.


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION Mosquito-transmitted dengue remains an endemic threat to population health in various tropical and subtropical regions. Recommended dengue prevention practices focus on vector control and reducing human–mosquito interactions, by practices such as removing standing water, wearing protective clothing and using repellent, as well as seeking medical care when symptomatic. Health workers in the community educate and empower citizens about recommended prevention practices, and thus are indispensable in implementing national dengue initiatives at the local level. However, their health messages may not resonate with all community members, resulting in low adherence to recommended prevention practices. Understanding the factors associated with low adherence to dengue prevention and control measures is essential for strengthening national dengue initiatives.
OBJECTIVE Identify health workers’ perceived challenges for dengue prevention and control strategies and describe their recommendations for strengthening dengue control in the Dominican Republic.
METHODS From January through March 2005, a qualitative study was conducted in five provinces of the Dominican Republic. Based on literature review and consultations with clinical specialists, a semistructured interview guide of nine questions was designed. A purposive sample of 19 health workers (10 men, 9 women) was interviewed, including public health practitioners, entomologists, educators, clinicians and an administrator. Question topics included occupational experiences in dengue prevention and control; views on vector control in communities; perceived challenges for citizens’ adherence to recommended practices; and suggested measures for strengthening adherence to vector control at local and national levels. Thematic analysis was used to identify salient themes.
RESULTS Health workers described the following perceived challenges: 1) limited individual economic resources; 2) individual lack of awareness, education or action; 3) limited cohesion among community members; and 4) limitations in sustainability of government interventions. They made 14 recommendations related to the 4 perceived challenges.
CONCLUSIONS These findings evince the complex interplay of economic, environmental, health, political and social factors that can directly or indirectly influence individual and community adherence to recommended dengue prevention measures. By understanding how these intrinsic and extrinsic factors hinder adherence, health authorities can adapt national policies to strengthen community participatory action in vector control, empower leadership potential by health workers and community members, and provide an appropriate systemic approach to preventing disease transmission.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. Global strategy for dengue prevention and control, 2012−2020. Gen eva: World Health Organization; 2012 Aug. 43 p.

  2. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013 Apr;496(7446):504−7.

  3. Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, et al. Refi ning the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012 Aug 7;6(8):e1760.

  4. Diamond MS, Harris E, Ennis FA. Defeating dengue: a challenge for a vaccine. Nat Med. 2012 Nov;18(11):1622−3.

  5. Morrison AC, Zielinski-Gutierrez E, Scott TW, Rosenberg R. Defi ning challenges and proposing solutions for control of the virus vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS Med. 2008 Mar;5(3):e68.

  6. Tapia-Conyer R, Betancourt-Cravioto M, Méndez- Galván J. Dengue: an escalating public health problem in Latin America. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2012 May;32 Suppl 1:14−7.

  7. Gratz NG, Steffen R, Cocksedge W. Why aircraft disinsection? Bull World Health Org. 2000;78(8):995−1004.

  8. Lounibos LP. Invasions by insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:233−66.

  9. Gubler DJ. Dengue, urbanization and globalization: the unholy trinity of the 21st century. Trop Med Health. 2011 Dec;39(4 Suppl):3−11.

  10. Kyle JL, Harris E. Global spread and persistence of dengue. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008 Oct 13;62:71−92.

  11. Spiegel J, Bennett S, Hattersley L, Hayden MH, Kittayapong P, Nalim S, et al. Barriers and bridges to prevention and control of dengue: the need for a social-ecological approach. Eco Health. 2005 Dec;2(4):273−90.

  12. Parks W, Lloyd L. Planning social mobilization and communication for dengue fever prevention and control: a step-by-step guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. 138 p.

  13. Guzmán MG. Thirty years after the Cuban dengue hemorrhagic epidemic of 1981. MEDICC Rev. 2012 Apr;14(2):46−51.

  14. Drexler A, editor. Handbook for integrated vector management. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012 Jun. 67 p.

  15. Lehmann U, Sanders D. Community health workers: what do we know about them? Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 Jan. 34 p.

  16. The World Bank [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank; c2017. Dominican Republic; 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: http:// data.worldbank.org/country/dominican-republic

  17. Whiteford LM. The ethnoecology of dengue fever. Med Anthropol Q. 1997 Jun;11(2):202−23.

  18. Pan American Health Organization; Ministry of Public Health (DO). Informe fi nal: estrategia nacional de gestión integrada de prevención y control del dengue, República Dominicana [Internet]. Santo Domingo (DO): Ministry of Public Health (DO); 2004 Nov [cited 2017 Apr 1]. Available from: http://www.paho.org/dor/index.php?option=com _docman&view=download&category_slug= prevencion-y-control-de-enfermedades-1&alias =46-estrategia-nacional-de-gestion-integrada -de-prevencion-y-control-del-dengue-2004&Item id=273. Spanish.

  19. Ministry of Public Health (DO). Dirección General de Epidemiología. Alerta epidemiológica No. 2 [Internet]. Santo Domingo (DO): Ministry of Public Health (DO); 2013 [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: http://digepisalud.gob.do/docs/ Vigilancia%20Epidemiologica/Alertas%20epidemiologica/Dengue/Nacional/Alerta%20Den gue%20agosto%202013.pdf. Spanish.

  20. Ministry of Public Health (DO). Normas nacionales para la vigilancia epidemiológica de enfermedades transmisibles y otros eventos. Serie de Normas Nacionales No. 11. Santo Domingo (DO): Ministry of Public Health (DO); 1998. 460 p. Spanish.

  21. Chapman HJ. Holistic approach in preventing spread of infectious diseases: a Cuban example. Perspect Public Health. 2016 Jul 1;136(4):189.

  22. Ministry of Health Buenos Aires; United Nations Children’s Fund. Participación social en la prevención, del dengue, zika y chikungunya: adaptación de la guía para el promotor. 3rd ed [Internet]. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/argentina/spanish/salud _MANUAL_DENGUE_A5-Version2016_web .pdf. Spanish.

  23. Wichmann O, Vannice K, Asturias EJ, de Albuquerque Luna EJ, Longini I, López AL, et al. Live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccines: the needs and challenges of post-licensure evaluation of vaccine safety and effectiveness. Vaccine. 2017 Oct 9;35(42):5535–42.

  24. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among fi ve approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (US): Sage Publications, Inc.; 2017 Jan 25. 488 p.

  25. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter; 15(4):351–77.

  26. Skinner CS, Tiro J, Champion VL. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior: theory, research, and practice. 5th ed. San Francisco (US): Jossey- Bass; 2015. p. 75–94.

  27. Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 5th ed. Lanham (US): AltaMira Press; 2011 May 16. 680 p.

  28. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.; 2014 Apr 9. 416 p.

  29. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003 Feb 1;15(1):85–109.

  30. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Classifying the fi ndings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res. 2003 Sep;13(7):905–23.

  31. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. 1st ed. Newbury Park (US): Sage Publications; 1985 Apr. 416 p.

  32. Pimentel R, Skewes-Ramm R, Moya J. Chikungunya en la República Dominicana: lecciones aprendidas en los primeros seis meses. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2014 Nov;36(5):336–41. Spanish.

  33. Fauci AS, Morens DM. Zika virus in the Americas – yet another arbovirus threat. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 18;374(7):601–4.

  34. Muñoz M, Navarro JC. Virus mayaro: un arbovirus reemergente en Venezuela y Latinoamérica. Biomédica. 2012;32(2):286–302. Spanish.

  35. Ministry of Public Health (DO). Informe de situación de salud de la República Dominicana, 2003 [Internet]. Santo Domingo (DO): Ministry of Public Health (DO); 2006 [cited 2017 Apr 1]. Available from: http://digepisalud.gob.do/docs/ Analisis%20de%20Situacion/Informe%20de%20 Situacion%20de%20Salud/Informe%20de%20 Salud%202003.pdf. Spanish.

  36. Georges AS, Mehra V, Scott K, Sriram V. Community participation in health systems research: a systematic review assessing the state of research, the nature of interventions involved and the features of engagement with communities. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0141091.

  37. Atkinson JA, Vallely A, Fitzgerald L, Whittaker M, Tanner M. The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination. Malar J. 2011 Aug 4;10:225.

  38. Wong LP, AbuBakar S. Health beliefs and practices related to dengue fever: a focus group study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Jul 11;7(7):e2310.

  39. Suárez R, González C, Carrasquilla G, Quintero J. An ecosystem perspective in the socio-cultural evaluation of dengue in two Colombian towns. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25 Suppl 1:S104–14.

  40. World Health Organization. Dengue: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control: new edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. 147 p.

  41. Institute of Medicine, Board on Global Health, Committee on Emerging Microbial Threats to Health in the 21st Century. Microbial threats to health: emergence, detection, and response. 1st ed. Smolinski MS, Hamburg MA, Lederberg J, editors. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2003 Aug 25. 398 p.

  42. Willis-Shattuck M, Bidwell P, Thomas S, Wyness L, Blaauw D, Ditlopo P. Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 4;8:247.

  43. Rathe M. Dominican Republic: Can universal coverage be achieved? Background Paper, 10 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010 [cited 2017 Jan 21]. 19 p. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/finan cing/healthreport/DRNo10FINALV2.pdf

  44. Gómez-Dantés H, Willoquet JR. Dengue in the Americas: challenges for prevention and control. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25 Suppl 1:S19–31.

  45. Pan American He alth Organization; World Health Organization. Últimos adelantos técnicos en la prevención y control del dengue en la Región de las Américas, 2014 [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: World Health Organization; 2014 [cited 2017 Apr 9]. Available from: http://www2.paho.org/hq/ index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view &Itemid=270&gid=27234&lang=es. Spanish.

  46. World Health Organization. One Health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 Sept [cited 2017 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.who .int/features/qa/one-health/en/

  47. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (US): Sage Publications, Inc.; 2013 Apr 18. 408 p.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com