medigraphic.com
Órgano de Difusión de la Asociación Académica Panamericana de Medicina Familiar A.C.

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med Fam 2017; 19 (4)

Knowledge and Attitudes of a Group of Mexican Family Physicians Regarding the Patient-Centered Clinical Method and the Family Health Study

Ramírez VI, García AGJE, Irigoyen CA

Language: Spanish
References: 38
Page: 113-120
PDF size: 268.27 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine in a group of family physicians in Guadalajara, Mexico, their opinion about the Patient-Centered Clinical Method (PCCM) and the Family Health Study (FSH). Methods: A survey of 80 family physicians and family medicine residents was conducted. The sample was non-random. The data were analyzed using frequencies, χ2, and linear regression. Results: 77.5% of the respondents knew the FHS, and 40% knew the PCCM. The difference was statistically significant. The favorable opinions were 54.8% for the FHS and 90.3% for the PCCM. Adverse opinions were 3.3% for the PCCM and 38.7% for the FSH. The di-fferences were statistically significant. Conclusions: The FSH is better known than the PCCM; but opinions favor the PCCM.


REFERENCES

  1. Dorado-Gaspar MP, Loria-Castellanos J, Guerrero-Martínez MB. Aptitud clínica hacia el estudio integral de la familia en residentes de medicina familiar. Arch Med Fam 2006;8(3):169-174.

  2. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, Mc Whinney R, Mc William CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centered Medicine. Transforming the Clinical Method. 2ª Ed. Abingdon U.K. Radcliffe Med Press. 2003.

  3. Consenso Académico. Conceptos básicos para el estudio de familias. Arch Med Fam. 2005;7(supl 1):S15-S19.

  4. Gómez-Clavelina FJ. ¿Por qué elaborar estudios de la salud familiar? Arch Med Fam 2000;2(1):3.

  5. Irigoyen AC, Morales H. Análisis estructural de 306 estudios de la salud familiar. Arch Med Fam. 2002;4(1):22-26.

  6. Facultad de Medicina UNAM. Plan único de Especialización en Medicina Familiar. Pp. 34. Disponible en: http://www.fmposgrado.unam.mx/programas/medfamiliar.pdf

  7. Navarro-García A, Ponce-Rosas R, Monroy-Caballero C, Trujillo-Benavides E, Irigoyen-Coria A, Gómez-Cla-velina F. Estrategias para elaboración de genogramas por residentes de medicina familiar. Arch Med Fam 2004;6(3):78-83.

  8. Gómez-Clavelina FJ, Irigoyen-Coria AE, Ponce-Rosas ER. Selección y análisis de instrumentos para la evalua-ción familiar. Arch Med Fam 1999;1(2):45-57

  9. Atención Familiar. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina de la UNAM. Consultado el 5 Feb 2010. http://www.facmed.unam.mx/deptos/familiar/atfm121/originalesbreves.html

  10. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWninney IR, Mc William CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centered Medicine. Transforming the Clinical Method. 4th Ed. London U.K. Radcliffe Med Press. 2014

  11. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, Mcwhinney IR, et al. The impact of patient-centered care outcomes. J Fam Prac 2000;49:796-804

  12. Being a General Practitioner. Curriculum for Speciality Training for General Practice. The Core Statement. Royal College of General Practitioners. London. UK. 2007.

  13. Secretaría de Salud, Gobierno de México, Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud, en materia de Investigación para la salud. http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/rlgsmis.html Consultado el 8 de octubre de 2009.

  14. Sheets KJ, Quirk ME, Davis AK. The family Medicine Curriculum Resource Project. Implications for faculty development. Fam Med 2007;39(1):50-2.

  15. Stearns JA, Stearns MA, Davis AK, Chessman AW. The Family Medicine Curriculum Resource Project Structural Framework. Fam Med 2007;39(1):31-7.

  16. Stearns JA, Stearns MA, Paulman PM, Davis AK, Sherwood RA et al. Family medicine curriculum project: The future. Fam Med 2007;39(1):53-6.

  17. Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA. Del Future Of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee. Future Of Family Medicine: A collaborative Project of the Family Medicine Community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;S3-S32.

  18. Jadad AR. Types of randomised controlled trials. En Randomised Controlled Trials. 1ª Ed. Reimp. 2000. Plymouth. GB. BMJ Books;1998;13-14.

  19. Rao JK, Weinberger M, Kroenke K. Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes. A literature review. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1148-1155.

  20. Medalie JH, Cole-Kelly K. The clinical importance of defining family. Am Fam Physician 2002;65(7)Edit:1277-1279.

  21. McDaniel SH, Campbell TL, Hepworth J, Lorenz A. Family-Oriented Primary Care. Second Edit. Springer, New York. 2005:9-10.

  22. Ramírez-Villaseñor I. La Familia Con Padecimientos Agudos Cap. 14. En: Carro RA, Aguilar VC, Peña MCG, Álvarez ONP. Medicina Familiar. Corporativo Intermédica. México D.F. 2008:356-381. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319205844_La_familia_con_problemas_agudos

  23. Freeman TR, Belle-Brown J. The second component: Understanding the whole person, Section2: context. En: Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney R, Mc William CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centered Medicine. Transforming the Clinical Method. 2ª Ed. Abingdon U.K. Radcliffe Med Press. 2003:71-82.

  24. Geyman JP. Drawing on the legacy of general practice to build the future of family medicine. Fam Med 2004;36(9):631-8.

  25. McWhinney IR. The importance of being different. British Journal of General Practice BJGP 1996;46:433-36.

  26. McWhinney IR. Being a general practitioner: What it means. European J General Practice 2000;6:135-139.

  27. Phillips WR, Haynes DG. The domain of family practice: Scope, role, and function. Fam Med 2001;33(4):273-7.

  28. Adler HM. The sociophysiology of caring in the doctor-patient relationship. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:883-890.

  29. Smith M, Anandarajah G. Mutiny on Balint: Balancing resident development needs with the Balint process. Fam Med 2007;39(7):495-7.

  30. Adler HM. The history of the present illness as treatment: who’s listening and why does it matter? J Am Board Fam Pract 1997;10(1) 28-35.

  31. Charon R. Narrative medicine. A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 2001;286:1897-1902.

  32. Jones AH. Narrative in medical ethics. BMJ 1999;318:253-256

  33. Greenhalg T, Hurwitz B. Narrative based medicine: Why study narrative? BMJ 1999;318:48-50.

  34. Greenhalg T. Narrative based medicine in an evidence based world. BMJ 1999;318:323-325.

  35. Blasco PG. A Medicina de Família: um Caminho para Humanizar a Medicina Revista Notandum- 2002;(V)9:51-60. Disponible En:http://www.hottopos.com/notand9/pablo.htm

  36. Ortiz GMT, Bernal IL, Cangas LJ, Ayzaguer LCS. Métodos de investigación diversos en el estudio de la salud familiar. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr 1999;15(2):151-5.

  37. Reach G. Simplistic and complex thought in medicine: the rationale for a person-centered care model as a medical revolution. Patient Preference and Adherence 2016:10 449-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S103007

  38. Miles, A. (2013). Science, humanism, judgement, ethics: Person-centered medicine as an emergent model of modern clinical practice. Folia Medica, 55(1), 5-24.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com