2017, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Med Crit 2017; 31 (1)
Ventricular-arterial coupling at the patient’s bedside. Is it possible? Is it useful?
Pérez NOR, Monares ZE, Zamora GSE, Montoya RJO, Corrales BEJ, Rodríguez GJH, Morales PJD
Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 20-24
PDF size: 186.84 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The best way to assess myocardial efficiency is by analyzing arterial-ventricular coupling. This complex analysis can be performed noninvasively by Doppler echocardiography.
Material and methods: A longitudinal, prospective, analytical study was performed with patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital San Ángel Inn Universidad admitted in shock (defined as a heart rate › 120 beats per minute or venous lactate › 4 mmol/L or lactate › 2 mmol/L plus one of the following: heart rate › systolic pressure, systolic pressure
‹ 90 mmHg). The following variables were recorded: age, gender, admission diagnosis, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate and serum lactate; an expert cardiologist performed the echocardiographic measurements required for calculating the ventricular-arterial coupling. A resident of intensive therapy obtained after a four-hour training the following values by the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor USCOM: SMII, FTC and PKR.
Results: We studied n = 47 patients diagnosed with shock; male n = 23 (48.9%), age n = 59 (41-73); n = 22 patients had septic shock (53.7%), n = 11 coronary syndromes (26.8%), n = 7 cor pulmonale (17.1%), n = 1 pulmonary embolism (2.4%). The arterial- ventricular coupling was measured by echocardiography: 0.74 (0.63-1.1). The arterial-ventricular coupling by USCOM was 0.72 (0.63 to 0.9), with a correlation of r of 0.8, an error rate of 24% and a p
‹ 0.002. The arterial-ventricular coupling by echocardiography with a cutoff of ≤ 0.7 predicts mortality with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 50%, with an area under the curve of 0.75 (from 0.59 to 0.96), p = 0.46. The arterial-ventricular coupling by USCOM with a cutoff of 0.7 predicts mortality with an 80% of sensitivity, specificity of 60%, with an area under the curve of 0.79 (0.64 to 0.95) p = 0.02.
Conclusions: It is possible to have the arterial-ventricular coupling measured in critically ill patients at their bedside by medical personnel with a four-hour training in a manner comparable to that of an expert echocardiographer. This allows the use of these complex hemodynamic analysis in a non-invasive way in the day-to-day care of the seriously ill.
REFERENCES
Sunagawa K, Maughan WL, Burkhoff D, Sagawa K. Left ventricular interaction with arterial load studied in isolated canine ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:H773-780.
Asanoi H, Sasayama S, Kameyama T. Ventriculoarterial coupling in normal and failing heart in humans. Circ Res. 1989;65:483-493.
Chantler PD, Lakatta EG. Arterial-ventricular coupling with aging and disease. Front Physio. 2012;3:90.
Elzinga G, Westerhof N. Matching between ventricle and arterial load. Circ Res. 1991;68:1495-1500.
Kass DA, Kelly RP. Ventriculo-arterial coupling: concepts, assumptions, and applications. Ann Biomed Eng. 1992;20:41-62.
Starling MR. Left ventricular-arterial coupling relations in the normal human heart. Am Heart J. 1993;125:1659-1666.
Binkley PF, Van Fossen DB, Nunziala E, Unverferth DV, Leier CV. Influence of positive inotropic therapy on pulsatile hydraulic load and ventricularvascular coupling in congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1127-1135.
Chang MC, Shayn MR, Scherer LA, Meredith JW. Improving ventricular-arterial coupling during resuscitation from shock: Effects on cardiovascular function and systemic perfusion. J Trauma. 2002;53:679-685.
Chang MC, Sheppard MJ III, Wayne MJ. Clinical application of ventricular end -systolic elastance and the ventricular pressure-volume diagram. Shock. 1997;7(6):413-419.
Shishido T, Hayashi K, Shigemi K, Sato T, Sugimachi M, Sunagawa K. Singlebeat estimation of end-systolic elastance using bilinearly approximated time-varying elastance curve. Circulation. 2000;102:1983-1989.
Bowe S, Thilaganathan B, Mantovani E, Khalil A. Inotropy index and ratio of potential to kinetic energy: Two novel parameters derived from continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound (St George’s Hospital, University of London, Maternal-Fetal Department, London, UK). Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women’s Cardiovascular Health. 2015;5(3):209-258.
Antonini CF, Poli S, Vriz O, Pavan D, Di Bello V, Nicolosi GL. The ventricular-arterial coupling: from basic pathophysiology to clinical application in the echocardiography laboratory. Journal of Cardiovascular Echocardiography. 2013;23(4):91-95.
Chen CH, Fetics B, Nevo E, Rochitte CE, Chiou KR, Ding PA, et al. Noninvasive single-beat determination of left ventricular end-systolic elastance in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001, 38:2028-2034.
Galvan R, Monares E, Chaires R. Acoplamiento ventrículo-arterial en choque séptico. Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int. 2012;26(1):26-35.
Smith B, Madiggan V. Non-invasive method for rapid bedside estimation of inotropy: theory and preliminary clinical validation. Br J Anaest. 2013;111(4):580-588.
Senzaki H, Chen CH, Kass DA. Single-beat estimation of end-systolic pressure-volume relation in humans: a new method with the potential for noninvasive application. Circulation. 1996;94:2497-2506.
Tiralongo GM, Lo Presti D, Pisani I, Gagliardi G, Scala RL, Novelli GP, et al. Assessment of total vascular resistance and total body water in normotensive women during the first trimester of pregnancy. A key for the prevention of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2015;5:193-197.
Thiel SW, Kollef MH, Isakow W. Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg rising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2009;13:R111.
Smith BE, Madigan VM. Rapid non-invasive determination of ventricular preload. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2008;36(4):609.