medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2017; 5 (1)

Comparison between the ICON index and the esthetic component of the IOTN to determine the need for orthodontic treatment

Cruz LMF, Gutiérrez RMF, Gutiérrez RJF, Rojas GAR

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 11-14
PDF size: 207.71 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Some indexes have been used in the international scientific community in response to the need for information about the severity of malocclusion and the perceived need for orthodontic treatment. The ICON index and aesthetic component of IOTN help clinicians to determine the need of treatment according to different parameters. Material and methods: The ICON index and the aesthetic component of IOTN were used to assess pretreatment orthodontic patients in study models of the Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit. The study universe was 986 models and the sample was 166 study models. The Microsoft Office Excel 2007 program was used to tabulate the information and perform descriptive statistics; the Kappa test was performed between the two indexes. Results: The mean for ICON was 40.38 and for the aesthetic component of IOTN, 4.03 points. The result of kappa test between the two indexes was good (0.789), both coincide in 89.46% of the evaluations. Conclusions: Both indexes may be used to determine the need for orthodontic treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. González V, Alegret M, González Y. Convención Nacional de Salud. Cuba Salud 2015. Palacio de Convenciones de la Habana. Disponible en: http://www.convencionsalud2015.sld.cu/index.php/convencionsalud/2015/

  2. Di Santi de Modano J, Vázquez V. Maloclusión clase I: definición, clasificación, características clínicas y tratamiento. Rev Latin de Ortod y Odontoped [Internet]. 2003 [citado 12 de octubre 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2003/art8.asp?print=true

  3. Ortiz M, Lugo V. Maloclusión clase II división 1; etiopatogenia, características clínicas y alternativa de tratamiento con un configurador reverso sostenido II (CRS II). Rev Latin de Ortod y Odontoped [Internet]. 2007 [citado 12 de octubre 2015]. Disponible en: https://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2006/pdf/art14.pdf

  4. Alemán-Estévez MG, Martínez-Brito I, Pérez-Lauzurique A. Necesidad de tratamiento ortodóncico en escolares. Aplicación del índice DAI. Rev Med Electrón [Internet]. 2011 [citado 12 de octubre 2015]; 33 (4): 441-447. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=s1684-18242011000400006&script=sci_arttext

  5. Elizondo-Dueñaz R, Yudovich-Burak M, Aguilar-Saavedra M, Meléndez-Ocampo A. Propuesta de un índice de maloclusiones invalidantes con potencial de deterioro y su aplicación. Rev Odont Mex. 2011; 15 (2): 77-95.

  6. Mafla AC, Barrera DA, Muñoz GM. Maloclusión y necesidad de tratamiento ortodóntico en adolescentes de Pasto, Colombia. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2011; 22 (2): 173-185.

  7. Delgado-Carrera L, Llanes-Rodríguez M, Rodríguez-González L, Fernández-Pérez E, Batista-González NM. Antecedentes históricos de los índices epidemiológicos para prioridad de tratamiento ortodóncico. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2015; 14 (1): 60-69.

  8. Avilés-Beltetón M, Huitzil-Muñoz E, Fernández M, Vierna-Quijano JM. Índice de necesidad de tratamiento ortodóncico (IOTN). Oral. 2011; 39: 782-785.

  9. Hunt O, Hepper P, Johnston C, Stevenson M, Burden D. The Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need validated against lay opinion. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24 (1): 53-59.

  10. Firestone AR, Beck FM, Beglin FM, Vig KW. Validity of the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) in determining orthodontic treatment need. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72 (1): 15-20.

  11. Ochi C, Idaboh G. Orthodontic treatment complexity and need at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, according to the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON): a pilot study. Pediatric Dental Journal. 2006; 16 (2): 128-131.

  12. Borzabadi-Farahani A, Borzabadi-Farahani A. Agreement between the index of complexity, outcome, and need and the dental and aesthetic components of the index of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140 (2): 233-238.

  13. Utomi IL, Onyeaso CO. Orthodontic treatment complexity and need in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014; 13 (3): 562-567.

  14. Manzanera D, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM, Gandía JL. Diagnostic agreement in the assessment of orthodontic treatment need using the Dental Aesthetic Index and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32 (2): 193-198.

  15. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A, Tsakos G, O’Brien KD. Oral health-related quality of life and the IOTN index as predictors of children’s perceived needs and acceptance for orthodontic treatment. Br Dent J. 2008; 204 (7): 1-5; discussion 384-385.

  16. Fox NA, Daniels C, Gilgrass T. A comparison of the index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) with the peer assessment rating (PAR) and the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN). Br Dent J. 2002; 193 (4): 225-230.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com