medigraphic.com
ISSN 1995-9494 (Electronic)
Revista del Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico "Arnaldo Milián Castro"

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med Cent 2017; 11 (1)

Resultados del implante coclear en niños mayores de seis años de edad con hipoacusia prelingual profunda

Díaz MI, Cabrera PA, Hernández FO, Treto FM, García MI

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 30-35
PDF size: 159.37 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the National Program of cochlear implant established in Cuba has benefited freely 216 children with severe and deep hearing loss. Objective: to compare the results obtained in children older than six years with deep prelingual hearing loss who have cochlear implant with a group of the same characteristics using another type of programmable digital prosthetic attachment. Methods: a prospective, descriptive and quasi-experimental study was realized at “José Luis Miranda” Hospital from October 2012 to September 2015. It was used a non-probabilistic sampling and the sample was 15 patients older than six years of age who underwent a cochlear implant (Group 1) and 25 of the same age who used a programmable digital hearing attachment (Group 2). A questionnaire was designed that included the variables: sex, age, age of implant, etiology, language, auditory performance and stage of rehabilitation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the Mann-Whitney test were used. Results: all patients with cochlear implants passed the detection-discrimination stage, seven reached the identification-recognition stage (46.7%) and four reached the stages of discrimination-identification and recognition-comprehension, respectively (26.7%). Patients with digital prostheses failed to advance to higher levels of rehabilitation (80%). Conclusions: Patients older than six years old who received a cochlear implant achieved higher auditory performance, higher levels in the rehabilitation stages and achieved better communication than users of digital prostheses.


REFERENCES

  1. Cristiani H. Historia delaudífono [Internet]. Argentina: Mutualidad Argentina de Hipoacúsicos; 2016 [citado 20 Dic 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.mah.org.ar/historia-de-los-audifonos

  2. ¿Qué es un implante coclear? [Internet] España: Federación AICE; 2016 [citado 20 Dic 2016]. Disponible en: http://implantecoclear.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76:ique-es-un-implante-coclear&catid=62:que-es&Itemid=82

  3. Roche JP, Hansen MR. On the horizon: cochlear implant technology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2015 [citado 27 Abr 2016]; 48(6):1097-116. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443490

  4. Cila Umat, Rinze AT. Cochlear implant research updates. In Tech [Internet]. 2012 Apr 27 [citado 20 Dic 2016]. Disponible en: http://blogs.sld.cu/marionod/2012/08/02/cila-umat-and-rinze-anthony-tange-cochlear-implant-research-updates-intech-april-27-2012/

  5. Corvera-Behar G, Cheja-Mochón R. Resultados del implante coclear colocado en pacientes prelinguales de 8 a 12 años de edad, quienes actualmente se encuentran en edad adulta. An Orl Mex. 2012;57(1):31-32.

  6. Martini A, Bovo R, Trevisi P, Forli F, Berrettini S. Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy. Minerva Pediatr [Internet]. 2013 [citado 20 Dic 2015];65(3):325-39. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23685383

  7. Cosetti MK, Waltzman SB. Outcomes in cochlear implantation: variables affecting performance in adults and children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2012 [citado 15 Abr 2016];45(1):155-71. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22115688

  8. Quique BY, FA MT. Métodos unisensoriales para la rehabilitación de la persona con implante coclear y métodos musicoterapéuticos como nueva herramienta de intervención. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2013 [citado 30Jun 2016];73(1):94-108. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/orl/v73n1/art16.pdf

  9. Byaruhanga R, Roland JT, Buname G, Kakande E, Awubwa M, Ndorelire C, et al. A case report: the first successful cochlear implant in Uganda. Afr Health Sci [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28 Nov 2015];15(4):1342-1348. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26958040

  10. 10.Jeya Kumar A. Pediatric cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Pediatr [Internet]. 2013 Feb [citado 28 Nov 2015];23(3):346-50. Disponible en: https://www.medschool.lsuhsc.edu/pediatrics/docs/Pediatric%20Cochlear%20Implants%20Grand%20Rounds.pdf

  11. 11.Rahal EM, Mena GP, Muñoz SD, Cárdenas GR, Mansilla JF, Cardemil MF. Resultados del Programa Nacional de Implantes Cocleares: Servicio de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital Barros Luco Trudeau. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28Nov 2015];73(3):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-48162013000300004

  12. 12.Teschner M, Polite C, Lenarz T, Lustig L. Cochlear implantation in different health-care systems: disparities between Germany and the United States. Otol Neurotol [Internet]. 2013 [citado 25 Sept2016];34(1):66-74. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23232831

  13. 13.Arauz S, Boccio C, CorderoL, Curet C, Vicente D, Hocsman E, et al. Recomendaciones del Comité de Expertos en implante coclear y dispositivos implantables de la Federación Argentina de Sociedades de O.R.L. (en concordancia con guías internacionales). Buenos Aires, 25 de abril de 2016 [Internet] [citado 15 Jun 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.faso.org.ar/imagenes/informe.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com