<< Back Next >>
Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo 2016; 17 (1)
Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 37-42
PDF size: 362.69 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The purpose of this study was the determination of functional capacity, or exercise tolerance or work load tolerance, from a sample of nurses from the Regional Hospital "Rafael Hernandez" of the Social Security Box of Chiriqui, Republic of Panama.
Methodology: We used an aleatory sample of 75 nurses, 64 female and 11 males, with a mean age of 35,28 years old, within a range of 21-60 years old. We used the Bruce Modified Protocol Treadmill Stress test and the functional capacity was determined by indirect method in met as a unit of maximal oxygen consumption.
Results: The observed mean maximal functional capacity for this sample was 10,1 met, 46,7 % completed the 2
rd stage and 34,7 % completed the 3
rd stage, 81,4 % of the sample completed the 2nd or 3
rd stage. The estimated functional capacity for stage 2 was 3,4 met, and for the stage 3 was 5,4 met. About the heart rate, the % of maximal heart rate reached was 85. The recovery time of initial heart rate after 5 minutes post-exercise was satisfactory.
Conclusions: The mean functional capacity observed was 10,1 met, acceptable, but if you compare it with the estimated one for 2nd and 3
rd stage of Bruce Modified Protocol, nurses did too much effort in order to overcome low exercise intensity or work load. It implies our nurses in general are sedentary and their morbid-mortality risk of cardiovascular and general mortality is increased.
REFERENCES
Miller TD. The exercise treadmill test: Estimating cardiovascular prognosis. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2008;75(6):424-30.
Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Brown T, Carnethon M, Shifan D, De Simone G, et al. Physical inactivity. Circulation. 2010;121:153-8
Noonan V, Dean E. Submaximal exercise testing: Clinical application and interpretation. Phys Ther. 2000;80:782-807.
Heyward V. Evaluación de la aptitud física y prescripción del ejercicio. Madrid: Editorial Panamericana; 2008. p. 61-9.
Ross A, Myers J, Williams M, Gulati M, Klingfield P, Balady G, et al. Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research setting. Circulation. 2007; 116:329-43.
Donato A, Tench K, Glueck D, Seals D, Eskurza I, Tanaka H. Declines in physiological functional capacity with age: a longitudinal study in peak swimming performance. Journal of AppliedPhysiology. 2003;94(2):764-9.
Ramirez-Velez R, et al. Capacidad funcional y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en trabajadores de una institución. Rev Cienc Salud. 2010;8(2):33- 43.
Jerome F, Piña I, Balady G, Chaitman B, Fletcher B, Lavie C, et al: Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research application. Circulation. 2000; 102:1591-7
Chen J Joseph. Functional capacity evaluation & disability. Iowa Orthop J. 2007;27:121-7.
Gross D, Battie M. Factors influencing results of functional capacity. Evaluation in workers compensation claimants with low back pain. Physical Therapy. 2005;85(4)315-22.
Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood E. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. NEJM. 2002;346 (11):793-801.
Snader C, Marwick T, Pashkow F, Harvey S, Thomas J, Lauer M. Importance of estimated functional capacity as a predictor of all causes mortality among patients referred for exercise thallium single proton emission computer tomography: Report of 3,400 patients from a single center. J Am College of Cardiology. 1997;30(3):641-8.
Morris CK, Ueshima K, Kawaquchi T, Hidec A, Froelicher VF. The prognostic value of exercise capacity: a review of the literature. Am Heart J. 1991; 122(5):1423-31.
Shishehbor M. Association of socioeconomic status with functional capacity, heart rate recovery, and allcause mortality. JAMA 2006;295(7):784-92.
Wilmore J. Fisiología del esfuerzo y del deporte. 5ª ed. Barcelona: Editorial Paidotribo; 2004.p. 12-5.
Arósa F, Boraita A, Alegría E, Alonso A, Bardajía A, Lamiela R, et al. Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en pruebas de esfuerzo. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2000; 53(08):1063-94.
Ehrman J et al. Clinical exercise physiology. Champaign IL; Human kinetics. 2th ed. 2009. p. 77-108.
Arbab-Zaden A. Stress testing and non-invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: time for a new paradigm. Heart Int. 2012;7(1):1-15.
ACSM. Guidelines for exercise prescription and testing, 3rd ed. 1986.
Scaglioni P, Aragón L. Efecto del tipo de propulsión en la frecuencia cardiaca máxima y en la percepción del esfuerzo de carrera. Rev Ciencias del Ejercicio y Salud. 2001;1(2):25-30.
Cole C, Blackstone E, Pashkow F, Snader C, Lauer M. Heart rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med. 1999;341: 1351-7.
Bourque JM, Holland B, Watson D, Beller G. Achieving an exercise workload of > or = 10 metabolic equivalents predict a very low risk of inducible isquemia: does myocardial perfusion imaging have e role? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(6):538-40.
Lauer M. Autonomic function and prognosis. CCJM. 2009:76(2):18-22.
Whipp BJ, Davis JA, Torres F, Wasserman K. A test to determine parameters of aerobic function during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1981;50:217-21.
Gulati M, et al. The prognostic value of a nomogram for exercise capacity in women. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:468-75.
Valle JI. Prueba de esfuerzo. Manual de Enfermería en arritmias y electrofisiología. Cap. 8; 2013. p. 137- 47.
Rammamurthy G, Kerr JE, Harsha D, Morton TE. The treadmill test-Where to stop and what does It means? Chest. 1999;115(4):1166-9.
Morshedi-Meibodi A, Larson MG, Levy D, O’Donnell CJ, Vasan RS. Heart rate recovery after treadmill exercise testing and risk of cardiovascular disease events (The Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:848–52.
Lipinski MJ, Vetrovec GW, Froelicher VF. Importance of the first two minutes of heart rate recovery after exercise treadmill test in predicting mortality and the presence of coronary artery Disease in men. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:445-9.