2004, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Med Cutan Iber Lat Am 2004; 32 (1)
Contact Dermatitis to Para-Phenylendiamine. A Ten-Year Experience
Fernández VJM, Armario HJC
Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 19-22
PDF size: 122.17 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: PPD is the main contact sensitizing agent in hairdressing.
We present a study whose objective has been to establish the real frequency
of positive reactions to PPD, its relevance, and to define the characteristics
of the patients on risk of active sensitization.
Material and methods: We have carried out a 10 -year retrospective
epidemiologic study. During this period patch tests were taken with the
standard battery of GEIDC to a total of 1,878 patients suspected of ACD.
Results: 60.96% of the patched patients presented at least a positive
response. 4.36% of these showed postive to PPD, of which 66% we found
to have a positive relevancy. The most frequent location of the lesions were
the hands (56%). The localization of the lesions in the scalp was
related to the use of capillary dyes that contained PPD. It is surprising the
elevated frequency of positive tests associated to Balsam of Peru (7%)
and fragrances mix (7%). In patients with a positive test to PPD we have found
a statistically significant association between a positive test to PPD
and working activity related with hairdresser shops (p < 0.01; OR: 8.49 with
IC 95%: 3.60 < OR < 19.97).
Conclusion: PPD continues to be a sensitizing agent that is frequent in
our environment, reason why it is important to keep it in the standard
battery. The prototype patient is a female with hand dermatitis, worker or
client of a hairdresser shop, that is sensitized due to the contact to
capillary dyes.
REFERENCES
Liden C, Brehmer-Andersson E. Occupational dermatoses from colour developing agents. Acta Derm Venereol 1988; 68: 514-22.
MacKie BS, Mackie LE. Cross sensitization in dermatitis due to hair dyes. Aust J Dermatol 1964; 7: 189.
Dooms-Goosens A, Scheper RJ, Andersen KE. Comparative patch testing with PPD - base and PPD -dihydrochloride: human and animal data compiled by the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms- Goosens A, Lachappelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Sheper RJ (eds). Current topics in contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer, 1989: 281-5.
Armstrong DKB, Jones AB, Smith HR, Ross JS, White IR, Rycroft RJG, McFadden JP. Occupational sensitization to pphenylenediamine: a 17-year review. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 348-9.
Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF, Fransway AF, Maibach HI, Mathias CGT, Nethercott JR, Rietschel RL, Sherertz EF, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38: 911-8.
Sharma VK, Chakrabarti A. Common contact sensitizers in Chandigarh, India. A study of 200 patients with the European standard series. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38: 127-31.
Goh CL. Comparative study of TRUE test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 27: 84-9.
Edwards EK, Edwards EK. Contact urticaria and allergic contact dermatitis caused by paraphenylenediamine. Cutis 1984; 34: 87-8.
Taylor JS, Maibach HI, Fisher A, Bergfeld WF. Contact leukoderma associated with the use of hair colors. Cutis 1993; 52: 273-80.
Sharma VK, Mandal SK, Sethuraman G, Bakshi NA. Para-phenylenediamineinduced lichenoid eruptions. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 40 -1.
Borelli S, Moormann J, Dungemann H, Manok M. Ergebnisse einer uierjährigen Untersuchungsreihe bei Berufsanfangern des Friseurgewerbes. Berufsdermatosen 1965; 13: 216 -38.
Nethercott JR, MacPherson M, Choi BCK, Nixon P. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14: 73-9.
Sutthipisal N, McFadden JP, Cronin E. Sensitization in atopic and non-atopic hairdressers with hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29: 206 -9.
Kligman A. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. J Invest Dermatol 1966; 47: 393- 09.
Lynde CW, Mitchell JC. Patch test results in 66 hairdressers 1973 -1981. Contact Dermatitis 1982; 8: 302-7.
Weller R, Ormerod A. Water tester’s dermatitis due to a para-phenylenediamine derivative. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 138.
Maibach HI. Paraphenylenediamine-free hair coloring mousse. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 15: 103.
Frosch PJ, Burrows D, Camarasa JG Dooms- Goossens A, Ducombs G, Lahti A, Menne T, Rycroft RJ, Shaw S, White IRl. Allergic reactions to a hairdressers’ series: results from 9 European centres. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28: 180 -3.
Simpson-Dent SL, Hunt SH, Davison SC, Wakelin SH. Tattoo dermatitis from primary sensitization to clothing dyes. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 45: 248.
Hatch KL, Maibach HI. Textile dye dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 631-9.
Hevre-Bazin B, Gradiski D, Duprat P, Marignac B, Foussereau J, Cavelier C, Bieber P. Occupational eczema from Nisopropyl- N’-phenylparaphenylene-diamine (IPPD) and N-dimethyl-1,3-butyl-N’-phen ylparaphenylenediamine (DMPPD) in tyres. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 1-15.
Le Coz CL, El Balaki A, Untereiner F, Grosshans E. Active sensitization to budesonide and para-phenylenediamine from patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 39: 153-5.
Rebandel P, Rudzki E. Occupational allergy to p-phenylenediamine in milk testers. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 138.
Kalish RS, Wood JA. Sensitization of mice to paraphenylenediamine and structurallyrelated compounds: adjuvant effects of vitamin A supplementation. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 407-13.
Basketter DA, Goodwin BFJ. Investigation of the prohapten concept. Cross reactions between 1,-substituted benzene derivatives in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 19: 248-53.
Krasteva M, Nicolas JF, Chabeau G, Garrigue JL, Bour H, Thivolet J, Schmitt D. Dissociation of allergenic and immunogenic functions in contact sensitivity to paraphenylenediamine. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1993; 102: 200 -4.
Picardo M, Zompetta C, Marchese C, de Luca C, Faggioni A, Schmidt RJ, Santucci B. Paraphenylenediamine, a contact allergen, induces oxidative stress and ICAM- 1 expression in human keratinocytes. Br J Dermatol 1992; 126: 450 -5.