Gómez MN

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 403-408
PDF size: 579.16 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Emphasize the importance of the use of ultrasound as the method of choice for the evaluation and control of adnexal masses. This has become an essential tool to guide diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Thanks to being a non-invasive procedure, plus its high sensibility and specificity, ultrasound has become the most used method, since it is able to define, characterize and determine the therapeutic management of adnexal masses. The ability to detect lesions early stage thus improves prognosis, in addition to the method accessibility to much of the patients has enabled using ultrasound as a routine method, with clear benefits to the population. This research is a review of the ultrasonographic features to the pelvic findings and their importance to the therapeutic approach.

REFERENCES

1. Bajo, J., Oresanz, I., & Xercavins, J. (2009). CÁNCER DE OVARIO. CLÍNICA, DIAGNÓSTICO Y TRATAMIENTO. In Fundamentos de GINECOLOGÍA (pp. 443– 465). Madrid: Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia (S.E.G.O.).

2. Campos Torres, J. C., Mauricette Derchain, S., Faundes, A., Clementino Gontijo, R., Zangiacomi Martinez, E., & Lucci de Angelo Andrade, L. A. (2002). Risk of Malignancy Index in Preoperative evaluacion of clinically restricted ovarian cancer. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 120(3), 72–76.

3. Clavijo Rodriguez, T., Lugones Botell, M., Guevara Alfayate, L., & Berlan Leon, N. (2012). Valor del ultrasonido en el diagnóstico de las masas anexiales. Revista Cubana Obstetricia Y Ginecologia., 38(3), 343–352. Retrieved from http:// bvs.sld.cu/revistas/gin/vol38_3_12/ gin07312.htm

4. Cruz Morales, R., Pavon Hernandez, C., & Pacheco Bravo, I. (2014). Utilidad de la evaluacion ecografica en la caracterizacion de las lesiones ováricas y su correlacion histopatologica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, México. Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia., 13(6), 370–377.

5. Donati, A. (2014). Masas anexiales. Guías de Práctica Clínica, 31, 16

6. Faye C. Laing, MD • Sandra J. Allison, M. (2012). US of the Ovary and Adnexa: To Worry or Not to Worry? RadioGraphics, 32(6), 20. Retrieved from radiographics.rsna. org

7. Fishman, D. A., Cohen, L., Bozorgi, K., Tamura, R., & Lurain, J. R. (2001). The role of ultrasound in detecting early ovarian carcinoma: The national ovarian cancer early detection program. Medica Mundi, 45, 42–47.

8. Fruscella, E., Testa, A. C., Ferrandina, G., De Smet, F., Van Holsbeke, C., Scambia, G, Timmerman, D. (2005). Ultrasound features of different histopathological subtypes of borderline ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstect Ginecol, 26, 644–650.

9. Jain, K. A. (2002). Sonographic spectrum of hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine., 21, 879–886

10. Jung, S. Il. (2015). Ultrasonography of ovarian masses using a pattern recognition approach. Ultrasonography, 34(3), 173–182.

11. Middleton, W., Kurtz, A., & Herztberg, B. (2005). Anejos. In Ecografia (pp. 558–583).

12. Rodríguez, K., & Villarroel, N. (2012). IMÁGENES ANEXIALES MEDIANTE ULTRASONIDO TRANSVAGINAL: UTILIDAD DE CLASIFICACIÓN GIRADS. Universidad central de Venezuela.

13. Tien Le, O., Christopher Giede, S. (2009). Initial Evaluation and Referral Guidelines for Management of Pelvic/Ovarian Masses. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 230, 668–673.

14. Zavaleta Landa, J. M., Sanchez Portillo, J., Gutierrez Espinosa, D. L., & Martinez del Razo, D. (2013). Caracteristicas ultrasonograficas benignas y malignas de masas anexiales. Revista de Investigación Médica Sur, 20(2), 130–132.