medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-4360 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C

2016, Number 2

<< Back

Rev Mex Periodontol 2016; 7 (2)

Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and subepitelial connective tissue. Presentation of a clinical case

Reyes-Hernández GP, Díaz de León-Torres E

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 61-66
PDF size: 305.28 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Gingival recession is defined as the displacement of the apical gingival margin towards the cementum-enamel junction with the exposure of the radicular surface to the oral environment. Several procedures are currently used to treat this diagnosis; some include surgical techniques such as the connective tissue graft, which is an autologous material that has demonstrated predictable results and is considered the «gold standard». Nevertheless, the connective tissue graft presents relative disadvantages, such as the requirement of two surgical sites (donor and recipient). Due to these factors, the use of bioabsorbable membranes as the «acellular dermal matrix» was recently introduced. This allows eliminating the need of a donor area, and reducing the surgical time, the discomfort and pain. This paper aims to assess the clinical efficacy of the acellular dermal matrix, a material used for periodontology, and compare it with the subepithelial connective graft in the management of Miller class I gingival recessions, used contralaterally on the same patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Vicario M, Pascual A, Vives M, Santos A. Técnicas de cirugía mucogingival para el cubrimiento radicular. RCOE. 2006; 11 (1): 61-73.

  2. Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth. J Periodontol. 2005; 76 (12): 2286-92.

  3. Gaertner W, Hagerman G, Potter M, Karulf R. Experimental evaluation of a bovine pericardium-derived collagen matrix buttress in ileocolic and colon anastomoses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 92: 48-54.

  4. Oates TW, Robinson M, Gunsolley JC. Surgical therapies for the treatment of gingival recession. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003; 8 (1): 303-20.

  5. Burkhardt R, Lange N. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32 (3): 287-93.

  6. Allen E, Miller P. Coronal positioning of existing gingiva: short term results in the treatment of shallow marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol. 1989: 60 (6): 316-9.

  7. Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP. Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. J Periodontol. 2005; 76 (2): 178-186.

  8. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1985; 56 (12): 715-20.

  9. Rosetti E, Marcantonio. R. Rossa C, et al. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol. 2000; 71: 1441-7.

  10. Trombelli L, Scabbia A, Takis D, Calura G. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects. J Periodontol. 1998; 69 (11): 1271-7.

  11. Rivera R, Castillo R, Málaga L. Tratamiento de recesiones gingivales múltiples con matriz dérmica acelular (Alloderm®): Resultados a corto plazo en zona estética. Rev Clin Period Implantol Rehab Oral. 2009; 2: 182-86.

  12. Cortellini P, Pini Prato G. Coronally advanced flap and combination therapy for root coverage. Clinical strategies based on scientific evidence and clinical experience. Periodontol 2000. 2012; 59: 158-84.

  13. Miller P. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1985; 5: 8-13.

  14. Joly J, Carvalho A, Da Silva R, Ciotti D, Cury P. Root coverage in isolated gingival recessions using autograft versus allograft: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2007; 78 (6): 1017-22.

  15. Aichelmann-Reidy M, Yukna R, Evans G, Nasr H, Mayer E. Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001; 72: 998-1005.

  16. Tal H, Moses O, Zohar R, Meir H, Nemcovsky C. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2002; 73 (12): 1405-11.

  17. Wei P, Laurell L, Geivelis M, Lingen M, Maddalozzo D. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study. J Periodontol. 2000; 71 (8): 1297-305.

  18. Hirsch A, et al. A 2-year follow-up of root coverage using sub-pedicle acellular dermal matrix allografts and subepithelial connective tissue autografts. J Periodontol. 2005; 76 (8): 1323-8.

  19. Novaes AB, Grisi DC, Molina GO et al. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001; 72 (11): 1477-84.

  20. Tarun A. Comparative evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and acellular dermal matrix allograft in the treatment of localized gingival recession- a clinical study. Journal of International Clinical Dentistry Research Organ. 2009; 1: 8-16.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com