Trigos MI

Language: Spanish
References: 36
Page: 177-191
PDF size: 616.90 Kb.

ABSTRACT

In the last 40 years, mammary reconstruction after mastectomy has evolved considerably with significant technical advance that has produced a wide variety of surgical techniques. When we have so many options, it is logical that there can be controversies and discrepancies in the preferences and indications of each of the techniques, that is why for didactic and technical reasons, we should analyze each of the options available, individualizing their indications, analyzing their benefits and limitations. In this paper, the author’s experience with 1,713 mammary reconstructions in the last 45 years is presented to analyze and review what has been done up to now, making a critical analysis and updating the surgical options available in the breast area, with the aim of orienting and promoting the spread of the concepts and a discussion on this subject.

REFERENCES

1. Carter SK. Treatment of breast carcinoma. West J Med 1976; 125: 38-47.

2. Handley RS, Thackray AC. Conservative radical mastectomy (Patey’s operation). Ann Surg 1963; 157: 162-164.

3. Patey DH, Dyson WH. The prognosis of carcinoma of the breast in relation to type of operation performance. Br J Cancer. 1948; 2: 7-13.

4. Ortiz MF, Trigos MI. Management of patients with complications of foreign material into the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 50: 42-47.

5. Trigos MI, Moya LA. Reconstrucción mamaria, indicaciones y técnicas en 163 casos. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam 1985; 11: 11-24.

6. Kroll SS. Bilateral breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25: 251-259.

7. Cronin TD, Upton J, McDonough JM. Reconstruction of the breast after mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 59: 1-14.

8. Tai Y, Hasegawa H. A transverse abdominal flap reconstruction after radical operations for recurrent breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53: 52-54.

9. Holmström H, Lossing C. The lateral thoracodorsal flap in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77: 933-943.

10. Cohen BE, Cronin ED. Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle cutaneous flap. Clin Plast Surg 1984; 11: 287-302.

11. Robins TH. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction. Auz N Z J Surg 1979; 49: 527-530.

12. Trigos MI, Hellow S. Detalles, refinamientos y discrepancias en reconstrucción mamaria. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam 1992; 2: 197-208.

13. Haddad JL, Hisch MJ, Chávez V y cols. Reconstrucción mamaria con tejidos autólogos. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam 2004; 30: 183-189.

14. Radovan C. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the temporary expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 195-206.

15. Argenta LC. Reconstruction of the breast by tissue expansion. Clin Plast Surg 1984; 11: 257-264.

16. Trigos MI, Herrán MFS. La mama contralateral como otro factor determinante de la reconstrucción mamaria. Cir Plast 2002; 12: 119-127.

17. Santamaría LE y cols. Reconstrucción mamaria con colgajo TRAM libre. ¿Se justifica el riesgo? Cir Plast 2001; 11: 49-60.

18. Shaw WW. Superior gluteal free flap breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 25: 267-274.

19. Boustred AM, Nahai F. Inferior gluteal free flap breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25: 275-282.

20. Mizuno H, Ito Y, Arai K. A breast reconstruction using deepithelized transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap with tissue expander. Jpn J Plast Surg 1994; 37: 437-442.

21. Ken-ichiro K et al. Breast reconstruction using a deepithelized TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 46: 103-107.

22. Trigos MI. Colgajo TRAM desepitelizado (sin isla de piel) para reconstrucción mamaria. Cir Plast 2003; 13: 74-80.

23. Codner MA, Bostwick J 3rd. The delayed TRAM flap. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25: 183-189.

24. Trigos MI, Herrán MFS. Reconstrucción mamaria con tejido autólogo desepitelizado en área preexpandida. Cir Plast 2009; 19: 44-50.

25. Trigos MI, Herrán MFS. Moderna reconstrucción mamaria con expansión tisular y relleno autólogo. Cir Plast 2011; 21 (2): 102-110.

26. Khouri R, Del Vecchio D. Breast reconstruction and augmentation using pre-expansion and autologous fat transplantation. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36: 269-280.

27. Shiffman MA, Mirrafati S. Fat transfer techniques: The effect of harvest and transfer methods on adipocyte viability and review of literature. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 819-826.

28. Bucky LP, Godek CP. Discussion of “Behavior of fat grafts and recipient areas with enhanced vascularity: An experimental study” by Baran CN et al. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 1652.

29. Uchiyama N, Miyagawa K, Matsue H et al. The radiological findings of the breast after augmentation by fat injection. Jap J Clin Radiol 2000; 45: 675-679.

30. Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP. Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 775-785.

31. Rigotti G, Marchi A, Sbarbati A. Initial treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: A healing process by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1409-1415.

32. Rigotti G, Marchi A, Sbarbati A. Adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells: Past, present and future. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33: 271-230.

33. Rigotti G, Marchi A, Sbarbati A. Determining the oncological risk of autologous lipoaspirate grafting for post mastectomy breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34: 475-480.

34. Haddad Tame JL, Jiménez Muñoz Ledo G. Descripción anatómico-quirúrgica del colgajo dorso-epigástrico. Una opción diferente en reconstrucción mamaria. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam 2012; 38-1: 27-34.

35. Trigos MI, Musolas JA. Alternativas en la reparación del área donadora del colgajo del músculo recto abdominal. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam 1989; 15: 247-254.

36. Trigos MI. Complejo malformativo de Poland. Experiencia y seguimiento a largo plazo. Cir Plast 2001; 11: 76-83.