medigraphic.com
ISSN 1527-3172 (Electronic)

2015, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

MEDICC Review 2015; 17 (4)

Outcomes among asylum seekers in Atlanta, Georgia, 2003–2012

Evans DP, Donato CE, Malewezi BA, Li AJ, Corea MJ, Mitchell AB

Language: English
References: 41
Page: 12-17
PDF size: 103.18 Kb.


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION Asylum seekers face a wide array of challenges, including the need for a fair and just adjudication process. In the state of Georgia, the Atlanta Asylum Network addresses the needs of such individuals by providing them physical, psychological and gynecological assessments, the results of which are presented to the courts in the asylum appeal process.
OBJECTIVE As a component of the Network's program evaluation, assess outcomes among asylum seekers using its services, as well as relation of outcomes to type of service provided, the individual's geographic origin and English language proficiency.
METHODS A retrospective examination was conducted of program data gathered by the Network between 2003 and 2012. Subjects included asylum seekers who received assessments by the Network during this period. The primary variable of interest was the final case outcome, defined as determination of asylum status: granted, withholding of removal, administrative closure and prosecutorial discretion, denied or voluntary departure. Outcomes were subsequently collapsed into a single positive or negative outcome variable. Positive outcomes included asylum granted, removal withheld, administrative closure and prosecutorial discretion. Negative outcomes included asylum denied and voluntary departure. We conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses, relating final case outcomes to Network services, geographic origin and English language proficiency, among the key variables.
RESULTS A total of 69 of 120 asylum seekers in the study had a known final case outcome, and of those, 63.8% (44) had a positive outcome; or 37% of the total number of asylum seekers (n = 120). Among the 20 who received 2 of the 3 types of assessment (physical, psychological, gynecological), 16 (80%) received a positive case outcome. Most persons with a known final outcome came from Africa (41), where 78% (32) of cases resulted positive. Asylum seekers not proficient in English were 2.4 times more likely to have a negative case outcome.
CONCLUSIONS Network assessment appears to result in higher rates of positive case outcomes compared to the average for asylum seekers seen in the Atlanta circuit court. Areas for programmatic improvement include systematic followup and increased community awareness of Network services, since the Network may directly impact future case outcomes by offering assessment to more asylum seekers. Access to English language instruction and legal representation for asylum claimants may also contribute to more cases with positive outcomes.


REFERENCES

  1. UNHCR. War’s Human Cost. UNHCR Global Trends 2013 [Internet]. Geneva: UNHCR; 2014 Jun 20 [cited 2015 Feb 26]. 52 p. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/5399a14f9.html

  2. United Nations Human Rights [Internet]. Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights; c1996–2015. Convention relating to the status of refugees, Res. No. 429 of 14 December 1950; [cited 2015 Feb 26]; [about 3 screens]. Available from: www.ohchr.org/EN/Professional Interest/Pages/Status/OfRefugees.aspx

  3. Congress of the United States of America. Refugee Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96–212, 201(b), 94 Stat. 109 (Mar. 17, 1980). Washington, D.C.: Congress of the United States of America; 1980 Mar 17.

  4. United Nations Human Rights [Internet]. Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights; c1996–2015. Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment Res. No. 39/46 of 10 December 1984); [cited 2015 Feb 26]; [about 5 screens]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Professional Interest/Pages/CAT.aspx

  5. USCIS [Internet]. Asylum Eligibility Part II: Well- Founded Fear; [updated 2012 Aug 23; cited 2015 Sep 21]. Available from: http://www.uscis.gov/ sites/default/files/USCIS/Humanitarian/Refugees %20%26%20Asylum/Asylum/AOBTC%20Le sson%20Plans/Well-Founded-Fear-31aug10.pdf

  6. Morof DF, Sami S, Mangeni M, Blanton C, Cardozo BL, Tomczyk B. A cross-sectional survey on gender-based violence and mental health among female urban refugees and asylum seekers in Kampala, Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Nov;127(2):138–43.

  7. Kalt A, Hossain M, Kiss L, Zimmerman C. Asylum seekers, violence and health: a systematic review of research in high-income host countries. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):e30–42.

  8. De Jesus-Rentas G, Boehnlein J, Sparr L. Central American victims of gang violence as asylum seekers: the role of the forensic expert. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(4):490–8.

  9. Eggemoen AR, Knutsen KV, Dalen I, Jenum AK. Vitamin D status in recently arrived immigrants from Africa and Asia: a cross-sectional study from Norway of children, adolescents and adults. BMJ Open. 2013 Oct 23;3(10):e003293.

  10. Nakash O, Langer B, Nagar M, Shoham S, Lurie I, Davidovitch N. Exposure to Traumatic Experiences among asylum seekers from Eritrea and Sudan during migration to Israel. J Immigrant Minority Health. 2015 Aug;17(4):1280–6.

  11. Hocking DC, Kennedy GA, Sundram S. Mental disorders in asylum seekers: the role of the refugee determination process and employment. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Jan;203(1):28–32.

  12. Jensen TK, Fjermestad KW, Granly L, Wilhelmsen NH. Stressful life experiences and mental health problems among unaccompanied asylumseeking children. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;20(1):106–16.

  13. Assiri AM. Asylum seekers and mental illness in Australia: a nursing response. Australian Nurs Midwifery J. 2014 Apr;21(9):32–5.

  14. Goosen S, Kunst AE, Stronks K, van Oostrum IE, Uitenbroek DG, Kerkhof AJ. Suicide death and hospital-treated suicidal behaviour in asylum seekers in the Netherlands: a national registrybased study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:484.

  15. Evans D, Buxton DC, Borisov A, Manatunga AK, Ngodup D, Raison CL. Shattered Shangri-la: differences in depressive and anxiety symptoms in students born in Tibet compared to Tibetan students born in exile. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;43(6):429–36.

  16. Storm T, Engberg M. The impact of immigration detention on the mental health of torture survivors is poorly documented—a systematic review. Dan Med J. 2013 Nov;60(11):A4728.

  17. Newman L, Proctor N, Dudley M. Seeking asylum in Australia: immigration detention, human rights and mental health care. Australas Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;21(4):315–20.

  18. Cleveland J, Rousseau C. Psychiatric symptoms associated with brief detention of adult asylum seekers in Canada. Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;58(7):409–16.

  19. Nakash O, Nagar M, Shoshani A, Lurie I. The association between acculturation patterns and mental health symptoms among Eritrean and Sudanese asylum seekers in Israel. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2015 Jul;21(3):468–76.

  20. Majumder P, O’Reilly M, Karim K, Vostanis P. ‘This doctor, I not trust him, I’m not safe’: the perceptions of mental health and services by unaccompanied refugee adolescents. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;61(2):129–36.

  21. Norredam M. Migrants’ access to healthcare. Dan Med Bull. 2011 Oct;58(10):B4339.

  22. Graham B, Herlihy J, Brewin CR. Overgeneral memory in asylum seekers and refugees. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;45(3):375–80.

  23. Lustig S, Kureshi S, Delucchi K, Iacopino V, Morse S. Asylum grant rates following medical evaluations of maltreatment among political asylum applicants in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2008 Feb;10(1):7–15.

  24. Physicians for Human Rights [Internet]. New York: Physicians for Human Rights; c2011. Reports. Examining asylum seekers: A clinician’s guide to physical and psychological evaluations of torture and ill treatment; 2012 Dec [cited 2015 Sept 1]. 191 p. Available from: http://physiciansforhumanrights .org/library/reports/examining-asylum-seekers -manual-2012.html

  25. UNHCR [Internet]. Geneva: UNHCR; c2001– 2015. Where we work. Around the world in many ways; [cited 2015 Feb 26]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/ pages/49c3646c206.html

  26. UNHCR [Internet]. Geneva: Europa Technologies Ltd; c1998. World Map; [updated 2008 Apr 24; cited 2015 Mar 30]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/487f12cb4.html

  27. UNHCR. [Internet]. Geneva: UNHCR; c2001– 2005. Asylum trends 2014: Levels and trends in industrialized countries; 2015 Mar 26 [cited 2015 Mar 26]. 28 p. Available from: http://www.unhcr .org/551128679.html

  28. UNHCR [Internet]. Geneva: UNHCR; c2001 –2015. Statistical Yearbook 2013. 13th edition; 2015 Feb 2 [cited 2015 Feb 26]. 202 p. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/54cf9bd69.html

  29. Government Accountability Office. U.S. asylum system: significant variation existed in asylum outcomes across immigration courts and judges. Washington, D.C.: US Government Accountability Office; 2008 Sep. 130 p. Report No.: GAO-08-940.

  30. Ramji-Nogales J, Schoenholtz A, Schrag PG. Refugee roulette: disparities in asylum adjudication. Stanford Law Review. 2007;60(2):295–412.

  31. United States Department of Justice [Internet]. Virginia: US Department of Justice; c2004. FY 2003 Statistical yearbook; 2015 Sep 22 [cited 2015 Sep 22]. 92 p. Available from: http:// www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/lega cy/2008/04/18/fy03syb.pdf

  32. United States Department of Justice [Internet]. Virginia: US Department of Justice; c2001. Statistical yearbook 2000; 2015 Sep 22 [cited 2015 Sep 22]. 47 p. Available from: http://www.justice .gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2001/05/09/ SYB2000Final.pdf

  33. United States Department of Justice [Internet]. Virginia: US Department of Justice; c2008. FY 2007 Statistical yearbook; 2015 Sep 22 [cited 2015 Sep 22]. 129 p. Available from: http:// www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/lega cy/2008/04/21/fy07syb.pdf

  34. Savage C. Vetted judges more likely to reject asylum bids. The New York Times [Internet]. 2008 Aug 23 [cited 2015 Feb 15]; [about 4 p.]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/ washington/24judges.html

  35. United States Department of Justice [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice; c2014. Atlanta immigration judge participates in naturalization ceremony; 2006 Aug 6 [cited 2015 Feb 25]. 2 p. Available from: http://www.justice .gov/eoir/press/06/NatzCeremonyAug72006.pdf

  36. United States Department of Justice [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice; c2014. Atlanta immigration judges take oath of office in Miami; 2006 Jun 5 [cited 2015 Feb 27]. 2 p. Available from: http://www.justice.gov/eoir/ press/06/MetcalfWilson.pdf

  37. Fennessy S. Insane Asylum. Creative Loafing Atlanta [Internet]. 2004 Feb 26 [cited 2015 Feb 26]; [about 10 screens.]. Available from: http:// clatl.com/atlanta/insane-asylum/Content?oid=12 46436&showFullText=true

  38. United States Department of Justice [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice; c2014. The executive office for immigration review swears in new immigration judge; 2011 Jun 13 [cited 2015 Feb 27]. 1 p. Available from: http://www.justice.gov/eoir/press/2011/IJInvest iture06132011.pdf

  39. United States Department of Justice [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice; c2014. Immigration judge takes oath of office in Atlanta; 2007 Feb 23 [cited 2015 Feb 27]. 1 p. Available from: www.justice.gov/sites/default/ files/eoir/legacy/2008/05/09/PelletierFeb23.pdf

  40. Evans D, Kohrt B. No refuge for persecuted neighbors: human rights and asylum in the Americas. AmeriQuests [Internet]. 2004 Nov 8 [cited 2015 Feb 26];1(1). Available from: http:// ejournals.library.vanderbilt.edu/index.php/ameri quests/article/view/6

  41. UNHCR [Internet]. Geneva: UNHCR; c2001– 2015. Asylum trends 2012: levels and trends in industrialized countries; 2013 Mar 21 [cited 2015 Feb 26]. 48 p. Available from: http://www.unhcr .org/5149b81e9.html




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com