2016, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Gac Med Mex 2016; 152 (1)
Family medicine in Mexico: Present and future
Varela-Rueda CE, Reyes-Morales H, Albavera-Hernández C, Ochoa Díaz-López H, Gómez-Dantés H, García-Peña C
Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 135-140
PDF size: 82.43 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Analyzing the challenges and the future scenario of Family Medicine is a priority to address challenges such as the reduction
of benefits granted by social security; to adapt their practice to the changing health profile; and to curb demand for specialized
services and contain the high costs of care in the second and third level. The program is aimed at three professional roles:
medical care, research, and education. It is imperative review these in the light of changing demographic conditions, the type
of health needs arising from new social determinants, the public expectations for greater participation in their care, and the
evolution of the health system itself with the advancement of technology and a variety of organizational options with frequently
limited resources. For primary care, as the core of a health system that covers principles of equity, solidarity, universality,
participation, decentralization, and intra- and inter-sectorial coordination, it is necessary to put at the center of the primary care
team the family doctor and not an administrator, who plays an important role in supporting the care team, but can not take
the lead.
REFERENCES
Twaddle AC. Health system reforms: toward a framework for international comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(5):637-54.
Starfield B. Family medicine should shape reform, not vice versa. Fam Pract Manag. 2009;16(4):6-7.
Flexner A. Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin N.o 4. Nueva York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910. p. 346.
American Medical Association. Ad Hoc Committee on Education for Family Practice. Meeting the Challenge of Family Practice: The Report of the ad hoc Committee on Education for Family Practice of the Council on Medical Education. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1966.
OMS/UNICEF. Atención Primaria de Salud. Informe de la Conferencia Internacional sobre Atención Primaria de Salud. Alma-Ata, URSS, 6-12 de septiembre de 1978.
Varela-Rueda CE. La formación de postgrado del médico familiar. México: Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Simposio Internacional de Medicina General/Familiar y Comunitaria; 1977. p. 144-53.
Hixon A, Maskarinec G. The Declaration of Alma Ata on its 30th Anniversary: relevance for family medicine today. Fam Med. 2008;40(8):585-8.
Uijen AA, Schers HJ, Schellevis FG, van den Bosch WJ. How unique is continuity of care? A review of continuity and related concepts. Fam Pract. 2012;29(3):264-71.
Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. Plan Único de Especializaciones Médicas en Medicina Familiar. México: UNAM, Facultad de Medicina, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación; 2009.
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco. Especialidad en Medicina Familiar. [Internet] Consultado el 2 de mayo de 2014. Disponible en: http://www.admision.posgrado.ujat.mx/cursos/especialidades/E_medicina_ familiar.html.
Universidad de Colima. Especialidad en Medicina Familiar. [Internet] Consultado el 2 de mayo de 2014. Disponible en: www.ucol.mx/docencia/ planes-estudio/documentos/E-110.pdf.
Reyes-Morales H, Flores-Hernández S, Sauceda-Valenzuela AL, et al. [Users’ perception about of quality ambulatory healthcare services in Mexico]. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55 Suppl 2:S100-5.
Heredia-Pi IB, Serván-Mori EE, Reyes-Morales H, Lozano R. [Gaps in the continuum of care during pregnancy and delivery in Mexico]. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55 Suppl 2:S249-58.
Chávez Aguilar V, Aguilar Mejía E. Aptitud clínica en el manejo de la familia, en residentes de medicina familiar. Rev Med IMSS. 2002;40(6):477-81.
Tun Queb MC, Aguilar Mejía E, Herrera Silva JC, Viniegra Velázquez L. Efectos del currículo por competencias en medicina familiar. Rev Med IMSS. 2003;41(1):5-13.
Chávez Aguilar V. Especialización en medicina familiar, modalidad semipresencial en el IMSS. Rev Med IMSS. 2005;43(2):175-80.
Cárdenas-Ayón M, Cabrera Pivaral CE, Viniegra-Velázquez L, González- Reyes HF, Luce-González EG, Ortiz-López MA. Satisfacción de los residentes de medicina familiar con el ambiente académico laboral. Rev Med IMSS. 2010;48(2):227-31.
Marchildon GP. Canada: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2013;15(1):1-179.
Wright B, Scott I, Woloschuk W, Brenneis F, Bradley J. Career choice of new medical students at three Canadian universities: family medicine versus specialty medicine. CMAJ. 2004;170(13):1920-24.
Senf JH, Campos-Outcalt D, Kutob R. Factors related to the choice of family medicine: A reassessment and literature review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16(6):502-12.
Maeseneer J, De Prins L, Gosset C, Heyerick J. Provider continuity in family medicine: does it make a difference for total health care costs? Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(3):144-8.
Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, et al. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2 Suppl 1:S3-32.
Muñoz-Hernández O, García-Peña MC, Vázquez-Estupiñán F. Perspectivas en medicina familiar. Archivos en Medicina Familiar. 2006;8(3):145-51.
Bucholtz JR, Matheny SC, Pugno PA, David A, Bliss EB, Korin EC. Task Force Report 2. Report of the task force on medical education. Am Fam Med. 2004:S51-64.
García JC. Paradigmas para la enseñanza de las ciencias sociales en las escuelas de medicina. Rev Cubana de Salud Pública. 2010;36(4):371-80.
World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2008. Primary Health Care – Now more than ever. [Internet] Consultado el 3 de mayo de 2014. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/whr/2008/whr08_en.pdf.