medigraphic.com
ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)

2016, Number 01

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2016; 20 (01)

Models and trials for angiogenesis study

Marañón CM, Pérez FL, Font SO, Moya GA

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 100-108
PDF size: 394.83 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The angiogenesis that leads to the formation of capillary nets, has an important role in a high number of physiological and pathological events, among which we can mention the embryonic development, wounds healing, arthritis, tumoral growth, metastasis and in the ischemic processes as one of the mechanisms of the endogenous and exogenous protection. To such effects the most used methods at the moment are analyzed either in vivo or in vitro for the angiogenesis studies; advantages and disadvantages of each one are highlighted too and the combination of both is emphasized.


REFERENCES

  1. Tahergorabi Z, Khazaei M. A review on angiogenesis and its assays. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012;15(6):1110-26.

  2. Brooks P, Montgomery A, Cheresh D. Use of the 10-day-old chick embryo model for studying angiogenesis. Integrin Protocols.1999;129:257-69.

  3. Beck H, Plate KH. Angiogenesis after cerebral ichemia. Acta Neuropathol. 2009; 117(5):481-96.

  4. Van Royen N, Piek JJ, Buschmann I, Hoefer I, Voskuil M, Schaper W. Stimulation of arteriogenesis: a new concept for the treatment of arterial occlusive disease. Cardiovascr Res. 2001;49(3):543-53.

  5. Auerbach R, Lewis R, Shinners B, Kubai L, Akhtar N. Angiogenesis assays: a critical overview. Clin Chem. 2003;49(1):32-40.

  6. Prabhu Veeramani V, Veni G. An essential review on current techniques used in angiogenesis assays. Inter J PharmTech Research. 2010;2(4):2379-87.

  7. Rosell A, Montaner J, Álvarez-Sabín J. Implicación de la angiogénesis en la isquemia cerebral humana. Rev Neurol. 2004;38(11):1076-82.

  8. Staton C, Reed M, Brown NJ. A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays. Int J Exp Pathol. 2009;90(3):195-221.

  9. Delle Monache S. Inhibition of angiogenesis mediated by extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MFs). PLoS ONE. 2013 [citado 15 May 2015];8(11).

  10. Hilkens P, Fanton Y, Martens W, Gervois P, Struys T, Politis C. Pro-angiogenic impact of dental stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res. 2014;12(3):778-90.

  11. Goukassian D, Diez JA, Asahara T, Schratzberger P, Silver M, et al. Overexpression of p27(Kip1) by doxycycline-regulated adenoviral vectors inhibits endothelial cell proliferation and migration and impairs angiogenesis. FASEB J. 2001;15(11):1877-85.

  12. Friis T, Kjaer B, Engel AM, Rygaard J, Houen G. A quantitative ELISA-based co-culture angiogenesis and cell proliferation assay. APMIS. 2003;111(6):658-68.

  13. Staton CA, Stribbling SM, Tazzyman S, Hughes R, Brown NJ, Lewis CE. Current methods for assaying angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Int J Exp Pathol. 2004;85(5):233-48.

  14. Oh SH, Woo JK, Jin Q, Kang HJ, Jeong JW. Identification of novel antiangiogenic anticancer activities of deguelin targeting hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(1):5-14.

  15. Bronckaers A, Hilkens P, Fanton Y, Struys T, Gervois P. Angiogenic properties of human dental pulp stem cells. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(8):71104.

  16. Malinda K. In vivo matrigel migration and angiogenesis assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;467:287-94.

  17. Lee KH, Choi HR, Kim CH. Anti-angiogenic effect of the seed extract of benincasa hispida cogniaux. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97(3):509-13.

  18. Akhtar N, Dickerson EB, Auerbach D. The sponge/matrigel angiogenesis assay. Angiogenesis. 2002;5(1-2):75-80.

  19. Fajardo LF, Kowalski J, Kwan HH, Prionas SD, Allison AC. The disc angiogenesis system. Lab Invest. 1988;58(6):718-24.

  20. Norrby K. In vivo models of angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10(3):588-612.

  21. Pan Y, Dong Y, Hou W, Ji Z, Zhi K. Effects of PEMF on microcirculation and angiogenesis in a model of acute hindlimb ischemia in diabetic rats Bioelectromagnetics. 2013;34(3):180-8.

  22. Auerbach RL, Shinners B, Kubai L, Akhtar N. Angiogenesis assays: a critical overview. Clin Chemistry. 2003;49(1):32-40.

  23. Schlatter PK, Karlsson LM, Burri PH. Quantitative study of intussusceptive capillary growth in the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the chicken embryo. Microvascular Research. 1997;54(1):65-73.

  24. Borges J, Tegtmeier FT, Padron NT, Mueller MC, Lang EM. Chorioallantoic membrane angiogenesis model for tissue engineering: a new twist on a classic model. Tissue Eng. 2003;9(3):441-50.

  25. Ruggiero M. Magnetic feld inhibits angiogenesis in chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004;25:390-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com