medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-6053 (Print)
Órgano oficial de difusión de los Hospitales Regionales de Alta Especialidad (HRAE)

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Evid Med Invest Salud 2015; 8 (2)

Pancreatoduodenectomy for biliopancreatic neoplasm, initial experience, technique and results in a High Specialty Hospital

Méndez VWR, Rodríguez CF, Vázquez PR, Angulo VF, Ceballos ZJ, Alonso PC

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 58-64
PDF size: 329.56 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is considered the surgical procedure of choice for periampullar cancer, although they have tried several surgical techniques different to pancreatojejunal anastomosis in order to minimize mortality, there is still disputed which of them has a clear advantage. Objective: To determine the factors associated with morbidity, mortality and relapse. Material and methods: Retrospective study included patients with periampullary tumor in whom a pancreatoduodenectomy (PDD) was performed on the HRAEPY between January 2011 and June 2014. Results: 44 cases were performed indicating neoplasia biliopancreatic, 20 were women and 24 men. The age of patients ranged from 41-72 years with an average of 58 ± 8. Mortality was 13.6% 6 patients. Conclusions: The only factor associated with mortality was staying at Intensive Care Unit and relapse factor was associated with vascular infiltration, however no conclusive data exist, possibly because it is a small sample and a short follow-up period.


REFERENCES

  1. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 10-15.

  2. Abu Hilal M, Malik HZ, Hamilton-Burke W, Verbeke C, Menon KV. Modified Cattell’s pancreaticojejunostomy, buttressing for soft pancreases and an isolated biliopancreatic loop are safety measurements that improve outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study. HPB (Oxford). 2009; 11: 154-160.

  3. Kausch W. Das Carcinoma der Papilla Duodeni und seine Vadikale Entfernung. Bietrage zur Klinischen Chirugen. 1912; 78: 439-486.

  4. Halsted WS. Contributions to the surgery of the bile passages, especially of the common bile duct. Boston Med Surg J. 1899; 141: 645-654.

  5. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 1935; 102: 763-779.

  6. Dumitrascu T, David L, Popescu I. Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010; 395: 677-684.

  7. Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Bodhankar YD, Suradkar K, Shetty G, Hawaldar R et al. Superior mesenteric artery first combined with uncinate process approach versus uncinate process first approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparative study evaluating perioperative outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011; 396: 1205-1212.

  8. Lupascu C, Andronic D, Ursulescu C, Vasiluta C, Vlad N. Technical tailoring of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with hepatic artery anatomic variants. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011; 10: 638-643.

  9. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Mantovani W, Butturini G, Gumbs AA et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 2003; 134: 766-771.

  10. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997; 226 (3): 248-57.

  11. Pallisera A, Morales R, Ramia JR. Tricks and tips in pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg. 2012; 99: 1027-1035.

  12. Weitz J, Rahbari N, Koch M, Büchler MW. The “artery first” approach for resection of pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: e1-e4.

  13. Xu YF, Liu ZJ, Gong JP. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with early superior mesenteric artery dissection. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010; 9: 579-583.

  14. Geer RJ, Brennan MF. Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 1993; 165: 68-73.

  15. Haddad LB, Scatton O, Randone B, Andraus W, Massault PP, Dousset B et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the conservative treatment of choice. HPB (Oxford). 2009; 11: 203-209.

  16. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al. Postcreaticoduodenectomy operative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005; 138: 8-13.

  17. Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E, Scopelliti F, Casarotto A, Bassi C. Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008; 15: 247-251.

  18. Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Liu YB et al. Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 692-698.

  19. Targarona J, Barreda L, Pando E, Barreda C. Is Peng’s pancreaticojejunal anastomosis more effective than mucosamucosa anastomosis in duodenopancreatectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary tumours? Cir Esp. 2013; 91 (3): 163-168.

  20. Marzano E, Piardi T, Pessaux P. The “hanging maneuver” technique during pancreaticoduodenectomy: The result of a technical evolution to approach the superior mesenteric artery. JOP. 2011; 12: 429-430.

  21. Hirota M, Kanemitsu K, Takamori H, Chikamoto A, Tanaka H, Sugita H et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy using a no-touch isolation technique. Am J Surg. 2010; 199: e65-e68.

  22. Norero E, Viñuela E, Báez S, Martínez C, Reyes J, Kusanovic R et al. Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of periampullary tumors. Rev Med Chile. 2011; 139: 1015-1024.

  23. Chan C, Franssen B, Uscanga L, Robles G, Campuzano M. Pancreaticoduodenectomía: resultados en un centro de alto volumen. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2006; 71 (3): 252-256.

  24. Katsaragakis S, Larentzakis A, Panousopoulos SG, Toutouzas KG, Theodorou D, Stergiopoulos S et al. A new pancreaticojejunostomy technique: A battle against postoperative pancreatic fistula. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19 (27): 4351-4355.

  25. Sáinz FC, Jiménez JG, González LR, Ruezga KL, Fuentes C, Cervantes LC. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 6 year-experience in a concentration hospital. Rev Latinoam Cir. 2013; 3 (1): 12-15.

  26. Hackert T, Werner J, Weitz J, Schmidt J, Büchler MW. Uncinate process first--a novel approach for pancreatic head resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010; 395: 1161-1164.

  27. Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S, Takada T, Miyazaki K, Kawarada Y et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012; 19: 230-241.

  28. Wojcicki M, Post M, Jarosz K, Bialek A, Wiechowska-Kozlowska A, Milkiewicz P et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy with a modified duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy: an analysis of 101 consecutive patients. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2012; 59: 1626-1630.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com