Fano MY

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 427-437
PDF size: 197.31 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the Dry Eye is defined like an illness of the tear pellicle and of the ocular surface;it has multifactorial origin that goes with ocular nuisances, visual fluctuations, unstable of the tear pellicle and potentialdamage on the ocular surface.
Objective: to describe clinical characteristics of the syndrome of dry eye in patientsassisted at Mario Muñoz Polyclinic.
Material and Methods: a carried out a prospective, longitudinal and descriptive study. The sample was constituted by 96 patients with diagnostic of dry eye fulfilling the inclusion criterion. Methods of descriptive statistic were applied for qualitative variables.
Results: 73, 9% of the patients were older than 40 years old. By each 5 women diagnosed with dry eye 1 man was diagnosed. The intermittent red eye was the more frequent symptom. It prevailing the conjunctival injectionlike sign. The most frequent etiology was tantalic with 44, 8%. The light dry eye was more frequent, with 90,6%. The Schirmer´s Test showed smaller securities to 10 mm in 41,7% of the sample and the BUT smaller than 10 seconds it prevailed with 60,4%.
Conclusions: the light dry eye of etiology tantalic prevailed in women older than 40 years, referring symptoms like intermittent red eye. The conjunctival injection was the most characteristic sign Phentobiomicroscopic. The Schirmer’s test and BUT were useful tests for the diagnosis of dry eye.

REFERENCES

1. Merayo Lloves J. Conceptos Actuales en Ojo Seco. Del Síndrome a la Enfermedad.[ Internet ] Grupo Español de Superficie Ocular y Cornea (GESOC); España. 2012. [Citado 13 Dic 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.lasuperficieocular.com/ficheros/ojoseco.pdf

2. Report of the International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS). The Ocular Surface. 2007;5:65-202.

3. Murube J, Benítez del Castillo JM, Chen Zhuo L, Berta A, Rolando M. Triple clasificación de Madrid para el Ojo Seco. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003;78:587-593.

4. Balbona Brito R, Torres García D, Vázquez Negrín FS, Síndrome de Ojo Seco. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en la Internet]. 2005 Jun18(1). [Citado 2014 Oct 03].Disponible en: http://scieloprueba.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext& pid=S0864-21762005000100011&lng=es.

5. Narayanan S, Redfern RL, Miller WL, Nichols KK and McDermott AM. Dry eye disease and microbial keratitis: is therea connection? The ocular surface. 2013;11:75‐92.

6. Fuentes-Páez G, et al. Falta de concordancia entre los cuestionarios y las pruebas diagnósticas en el Síndrome de Ojo Seco. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. Ene 2011;86(1):3-7.

7. Lemp MA, Bron AJ, Baudouin C, Benítez Del Castillo JM, Geffen D, Tauber J, Foulks GN, Pepose JS, Sullivan BD. Tear osmolarity in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:792-798.

8. Informe del subcomité para metodología de Ojos Seco. Metodologías para Diagnosticar y Supervisar la Enfermedad de Ojo Seco The ocular surface[ Internet ] 2007 abril; 5( 2):5. [ Citado 13 Dic 2013]. Disponible en:http://www.theocularsurface.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/metodologiaspara- Diagnosticar-y-supervisar-la-enfermedad-de-ojo-seco.pdf

9. Lemp MA,Crews LA, Bron AJ, Foulks GN and Sullivan BD. Distribution Of Aqueous deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic based patient cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 2012;31:472-478.

10. Figueroa-Ortiz LC, et al. Estudio de la función lagrimal y la superficie conjuntival en pacientes diabéticos. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, Abr 2011;86(4):107-112.

11. Morales-Fernández L, et al. Correlación clínico-histológica en los pacientes con ojo seco. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, Jul 2010;85(7):239-245.

12. Schaumberg DA, Dana R, Buring JE and Sullivan DA. Prevalence of dry eye disease among US men: estimates from the Physicians' Health Studies. Archives of ophthalmology. 2009; 127:763-768.

13. García Álvarez PE, García Lozada D. Factores asociados con el síndrome de visión por el uso de computador. Investigaciones Andina.Internet. 2010:12 (20): 7. [Citado 26 May 2014]. Disponible en : http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2390/ 239016509005.pdf

14. Logaraj M, Madhupriya V, Hegde SK. Computer Vision Syndrome and Associated Factors Among Medical and Engineering Students in Chennai . Ann Med Health Sci Res [ Internet ] . 2014 Mar-Apr ; 4(2): 7. [Citado 26 May 2014]. Disponible en : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991936/

15. Kartar Singh D, Deepak Kumar A, Sanjeev Kumar S. Clinical efficacy of Ayurvedic management in computer vision syndrome: A pilot study .Ayu[ Internet ]. 2012 Jul-Sep; 33(3): 8. [Citado 26 May 2014]. Disponible en : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665100/

16. Smita A, Dishanter G, Anshu S. Evaluation of the Factors which Contribute to the Ocular Complaints in Computer Users . J ClinDiagn Res [Internet ]. 2013 February; 7(2): 7. [ Citado 26 May 2014]. Disponible en : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592304/

17. Berenguer Subil J. NTP 289: Síndrome del edificio enfermo: factores de riesgo [Internet] Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. España. 2009. [Citado 26 May 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.insht.es/InshtWeb/Contenidos/ Documentacion/FichasTecnicas/NTP/Ficheros/201a300/ntp_289.pdf

18. Fechtner RD, Godfrey DG, Budenz D, et al. Prevalence of ocular surface complaints in patients with glaucoma using topical intraocular pressure-lowering medications. Cornea. 2010; 29(6): 618-621.

19. Asbell PA, Spiegel S. Ophthalmogist perceptions regarding treatment of moderate to-severe dry eye: results of a physician survey. Eye Contact Lens. 2010; 36(1):33-38.

20. Knop E, KnopN, Millar T, Obata H and Sullivan DA. The international Workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian glad Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2011; 52:1938-1978.

21. Johnson ME. The association between symptoms of discomfort and signs in dry eye. Ocul Surf. 2009;7(4):199-211.

22. Cajucom-Uy H, Tong L, Wong TY, Tay WT, Saw SM. The prevalence of and risk factors for pterygium in an urban Malay population: the Singapore Malay Eye Study (SiMES). Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:977-81.

23. Bai H, Teng Y, Wong L, Jhanji V, Pang C, Yam GH. Proliferative and migratory aptitude in pterygium. Histochem Cell Biol. 2010; 134: 527-535.

24. Labbé A, Gheck L, Iordanidou V, Mehanna C, Bringnole-Baudouin F, Baudouin C. An in vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology evaluation in pterygium activity. Cornea. 2010; 29: 392-39.

25. Maskin L. Dry Eye Relief. Peeling back layers to reveal root causes, select the right tools and improve tear quality. Ophthalmol Maneg. 2011. [Citado 5 dic 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/ articleviewer.aspx?articleId=105865

26. Liu S, Richards SM, Lo K, Hatton M, Fay A and Sullivan DA. Changes ingene expression human meibomian gland dysfunction. Investigatie ophthalmology & visual science. 2011;52:2727-2740.

27. Lemp MA and Nichols KK. Blepharitis in the United States 2009: a survey based perspective on prevalence and treatment.The ocular surface. 2009;7:S1-S14.

28. Green-Church KB, Butovich I, Willcox M, et al. The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on tear film lipids and lipid-protein interactions in health and disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1979-1993.

29. Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, Tong L, Uchino M, Nichols KK. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1994-200.

30. Kallarackal GU, Ansari EA, Amos N, Martin JC, Lane C, Camilleri JP. A comparative study to assess the clinical use of Fluorescein Meniscus Time (FMT) with Tear Break up Time (TBUT) and Shirmer´s test (ST) in the diagnosis of dry eyes. Eye. 2002; 16: 594-600.