2001, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Vet Mex 2001; 32 (3)
Antibody response to PPD in cattle from herds with different tuberculosis prevalence in Mexico
Estrada-Chávez C, Mancilla R, Arriaga DC, Pérez GR, Díaz OF
Language: English/Spanish
References: 27
Page: 207-211
PDF size: 38.70 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Antibody response to PPD of cattle from herds with different tuberculosis status was assessed by ELISA. Tuberculosis-free group presented significantly lower optical density values than herds in which tuberculosis had been controlled in infected herds or cattle with necropsy–proven tuberculosis. Highest antibody levels were found in serum samples from tuberculous cattle and infected herds. However, some animals from the controlled group, in which tuberculin reactors were not demonstrated in the last year, showed also high antibody levels by ELISA suggesting a residual infection present in these herds. Two tuberculous animals, tuberculin non-reactors (anergic), showed high antibody titers. These results indicate the usefulness of ELISA with PPD as an antigen to identify anergic Mycobacterium bovis infected animals, and for monitoring and confirming the epidemiological status of herds under-control by the tuberculosis eradication campaign.
REFERENCES
International Meeting on the Eradication of Bovine Tuberculosis in the Americas. Bull Pan Am Health Org 1992;26:279-281.
2. Gurría TF. Situación actual de la campaña contra la tuberculosis y brucelosis en México. Méx Ganadero 1994;385:21-28.
3. González-Llamazares OR, Gutiérrez-Martin CB, Álvarez-Nistal D, de la Puente-Redondo VA, Domínguez-Rodríguez L, Rodríguez-Ferri EF. Field evaluation of the single intradermal cervical tuberculin test and the interferon-gamma assay for detection and eradication of bovine tuberculosis in Spain. Vet Microbiol 1999;70:55-66.
4. Neill SD, Hanna J, Mackie DP, Bryson TG. Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from the respiratory tracts of skin test-negative cattle. Vet Rec 1992;131:45-47.
5. Neill SD, Cassidy J, Hanna J, Mackie DP, Pollock JM, Clements A, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in skin test-negative cattle with an assay for bovine interferon-gamma. Vet Rec 1994;135:134-135.
6. Wilesmith JW, Williams DR. Observations on the incidence of herds with non-visible lesioned tuberculin test reactors in south-west England. Epidemiol Infect 1987;99:173-178.
7. Díaz OF, Estrada-Chávez C, Banda RV, Arriaga C. Importancia del empleo de herramientas complementarias para el diagnóstico de la tuberculosis bovina. II Congreso Nacional de la Academia Veterinaria Mexicana; 1999 junio 3-5; Veracruz, Ver. México (DF): Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, UNAM, 1999:41.
8. Hanna J, Neill SD, O’Brien JJ. Use of PPD and phosphatide antigens in an ELISA to detect the serological response in experimental bovine tuberculosis. Res Vet Sci 1989;47:43-47.
9. Estrada-Chavez C, Diaz OF, Perez GR. Comparison of three immunodiagnostic tests with necropsy examination results for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. International Symposium on Bovine Tuberculosis in Animals and Human Beings; 1995 Nov 14-18; Riverdale (Maryland) USA. Riverdale, MD, 1995:14.
Fifis T, Costopoulos C, Corner LA, Wood PR. Serological reactivity to Mycobacterium bovis protein antigens in cattle. Vet Microbiol 1992;30:343-354.
Sugden EA, Stilwell K, Rohonczy EB, Martineau P. Competitive and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for Mycobacterium bovis infections based on MPB70 and lipoarabinomannan antigens. Can J Vet Res 1997;61:8-14.
Ostyn A, Laneelle MA, Thorel MF. Glycolipid antigen for use in diagnostic assays for bovine tuberculosis. Res Microbiol 1997;148:491-500.
Lyashchenko KP, Pollock JM, Colangeli R, Gennaro ML. Diversity of antigen recognition by serum antibodies in experimental bovine tuberculosis. Infect Immun 1998;66:5344-5349.
Auer LA. Assessment of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of cattle infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Austr Vet J 1987;64:172-176.
Wood PR, Corner LA, Rothel JS, Ripper JL, Fifis T, McCormick BS, et al. A field evaluation of serological and cellular diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis. Vet Microbiol 1992;31:71-79.
Plackett P, Ripper J, Corner LA, Small K, de Witte K, Melville L, et al. An ELISA for the detection of anergic tuberculous cattle. Austr Vet J 1989;66:15-19.
Hanna J, Neill SD, O’Brien JJ. ELISA tests for antibodies in experimental bovine tuberculosis. Vet Microbiol 1992;31:243-249.
Corner LA. Post mortem diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. Vet Microbiol 1994;40:53-63.
Payeur JB, Jarnagin JL, Marquardt JG, Schaper LA, Martin BM. Laboratory methods in veterinary mycobacteriology for isolation and identification of mycobacteria. Ames, Iowa: National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 1993.
Corner L, Melville L, McCubbin K, Small KJ, McCormick BS, Wood PR, Rothel JS. Efficiency of inspection procedures for the detection of tuberculous lesions in cattle. Austr Vet J 1990;67:389-92.
Voller A, Bidwell DE, Bartlett A. The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A guide with abstracts of microplate applications. London (UK): Dynatech Laboratories, Inc., 1979.
Ritacco V. Further evaluation of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. J Vet Med Series B 1990;37:19-27.
Denny GO, Wilesmith JW. Bovine tuberculosis in Northern Ireland: a case-control study of herd risk factors. Vet Rec 1999;144:305-310.
Ritacco V, Lopez B, De Kantor IN, Barrera L, Errico F, Nader A. Reciprocal cellular and humoral immune responses in bovine tuberculosis. Res Vet Sci 1991;50:365-367.
Lepper AW, Corner LA, Pearson CW. Serological responses in experimental bovine tuberculosis. Austr Vet J 1977;53:301-305.
Doherty ML, Bassett HF, Quinn PJ, Davis WC, Monaghan ML. Effects of dexamethasone on cell-mediated immune responses in cattle sensitized to Mycobacterium bovis. Am J Vet Res 1995;56:1300-1306.
Doherty ML, Monaghan ML, Bassett HF, Quinn PJ, Davis WC. Effect of dietary restriction on cell-mediated immune responses in cattle infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1996;49:307-320.