2013, Number 5
<< Back Next >>
Ann Hepatol 2013; 12 (5)
Imaging surveillance and multidisciplinary review improves curative therapy access and survival in HCC patients
Gaba RC, Kallwitz ER, Parvinian A, Bui JT, Von RNM, Berkes JL, Cotler SJ
Language: English
References: 18
Page: 766-773
PDF size: 151.33 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Imaging surveillance and multidisciplinary conference (MDC) review can potentially improve
survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by increasing access to liver transplantation. Geographic
disparities in donor organ availability may reduce this benefit. This study evaluated the impact of
HCC surveillance on use of curative therapies and survival in a region with long transplant waiting times.
Material and methods. 167 HCC patients were retrospectively studied. Subjects had an established HCC
diagnosis or were diagnosed during hepatology follow-up. Collected data included patient demographics,
HCC surveillance and MDC review status, portal hypertension complications, laboratory and radiologic parameters,
tumor size, therapeutic interventions, tumor progression, and mortality. The primary outcome
measures were use of curative treatments and survival. A Cox-regression model was constructed utilizing
factors associated with survival in univariate analysis.
Results. 58% of subjects underwent surveillance and
MDC review of HCC. These patients were more likely to have received treatment with ablation or resection
(16
vs. 3%, P = 0.006) and transplantation (23
vs. 4%, P = 0.001), and were less likely to develop tumor progression
(45
vs. 68%, P = 0.005) or metastases (0
vs. 19%, P ‹ 0.001). In multivariate analysis, surveillance and
MDC review (P = 0.034, HR 0.520, 95% CI 0.284-0.952), tumor meeting Milan criteria (P ‹ 0.001, HR 0.329, 95%
CI 0.178-0.607), curative therapy application (P = 0.048, HR 0.130, 95% CI 0.017-0.979), and transplantation
(P = 0.004, HR 0.236, 95% CI 0.088-0.632) were associated with survival.
Conclusion. In conclusion, imaging
surveillance and MDC review is associated with detection of early stage HCC, increased access to curative
therapies and transplantation, and prolonged survival.
REFERENCES
Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1485-91.
Schutte K, Bornschein J, Malfertheiner P. Hepatocellular carcinoma-epidemiological trends and risk factors. Dig Dis 2009; 27: 80-92.
Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011; 53: 1020-2.
Raoul JL. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and current treatment options. Semin Nucl Med 2008; 38: S13-s18.
Llovet JM, Schwartz M, Mazzaferro V. Resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 2005; 25: 181-200.
Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology 1999; 30: 1434-40.
Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, Montalto F, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 693-9.
Park SJ, Freise CE, Hirose R, Kerlan RK, Yao FY, Roberts JP, Vagefi PA. Risk factors for liver transplant waitlist dropout in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Transplant 2012; 26: E359-E364.
Dhanasekaran R, Khanna V, Kooby DA, Spivey JR, Parekh S, Knechtle SJ, Carew JD, et al. The effectiveness of locoregional therapies versus supportive care in maintaining survival within the Milan criteria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: 1197- 204; quiz 204.
Stravitz RT, Heuman DM, Chand N, Sterling RK, Shiffman ML, Luketic VA, Sanyal AJ, et al. Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis improves outcome. Am J Med 2008; 121: 119-26.
Davila JA, Morgan RO, Richardson PA, Du XL, McGlynn KA, El-Serag HB. Use of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis in the United States. Hepatology 2010; 52: 132-41.
Singal A, Volk ML, Waljee A, Salgia R, Higgins P, Rogers MA, Marrero JA. Meta-analysis: surveillance with ultrasound for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 30: 37-47.
Chan AC, Poon RT, Ng KK, Lo CM, Fan ST, Wong J. Changing paradigm in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma improves the survival benefit of early detection by screening. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 666-73.
Chang TT, Sawhney R, Monto A, Davoren JB, Kirkland JG, Stewart L, Corvera CU. Implementation of a multidisciplinary treatment team for hepatocellular cancer at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center improves survival. HPB (Oxford) 2008; 10: 405-11.
Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, Griffith C, Trevatt P, Richards M, Ramirez AJ. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ 2010; 340: c951.
Fennell ML, Das IP, Clauser S, Petrelli N, Salner A. The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010; 2010: 72-80.
Gish RG, Lencioni R, Di Bisceglie AM, Raoul JL, Mazzaferro V. Role of the multidisciplinary team in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 6: 173-85.
2010 Annual Report of the U. S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation, Rockville MD, 2011.