Carrillo-Esper R, Meza-Márquez JM

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 406-409
PDF size: 182.31 Kb.

ABSTRACT

There are different tests for coagulation monitoring in the perioperative; however, the thrombelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) have shown many advantages over standard tests to assess clotting in the different phases of this, its easy use, rapid attainment also allow establish a specific treatment.

REFERENCES

1. De Lange NM, Lance MD, De Groot R, Beckers EAM, Henskens YM, Scheepers HCJ. Obstetric hemorrhage and coagulation: an update. Thromboelastography, thromboelastometry, and conventional coagulation tests in the diagnosis and prediction of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67:426-435.

2. Collis RE, Collins EW. Haemostatic management of obstetric haemorrhage. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:78-86.

3. Davenport R, Khan S. Management of major trauma haemorrhage: treatment priorities and controversies. Br J Haematol. 2011;155:537-548.

4. Besser MW, Ortmann E, Klein AA. Haemostatic management of cardiac surgical haemorrhage. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:87-95.

5. Dekker SE, Viersen VA, Duvekot A, de Jong M, van den Bron CE, van de Ven PH, et al. Lysis onset time as diagnostic rotational thromboelastometry parameter for fast detection of hyperfibrinolysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:89-97.

6. Johansson P. Coagulation monitoring of the bleeding traumatized patient. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2012;25:235-241.

7. Thakur M, Ahmed AB. A review of thromboelastography. Int J Periop Ultrasound Appl Technol. 2012;1:25-29.