medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2015, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2015; 19 (3)

Resistance to fracture of teeth with weakened roots using posts with and without root filling. A systematic review

Carvajal CK, Madera AMV, Bernett ZGP

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 149-154
PDF size: 225.19 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Teeth with thin root walls exhibit high fracture rate; it is therefore a challenge to find the ideal method to provide them with resistance. To this end, posts, either unfilled or filled with intra-root filling have been used, nevertheless, to this date, no certainty has been established on the differences among these therapeutic options. The main purpose of the present review was to compare evidence results on resistance to fracture of teeth with weakened roots which had been reinforced with either filled or unfilled posts, after being subjected to compressive forces. An electronic search was conducted in different databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed and Ovid). The search was unrestricted with respect to year or language. Aforementioned search produced 148 articles. Each author independently conducted data extraction and quality assessment of each article, following parameters established in calibration (gauging). Finally, seven articles meeting with inclusion criteria were selected. After information collection and analysis, it was concluded that resistance increase in root-weakened teeth was effected when intra-root posts were used, irrespectively of whether these posts had or did not have dentin root reinforcement material.


REFERENCES

  1. Fariniuk LF, Souza MH, Westphalen VP, Carneiro E, Silva UX, Roskamp L et al. Evaluation of care of dentoalveolar trauma. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18 (4): 343-345.

  2. Faus-Damiá M, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses I, Faus-Matoses V, Faus-Llácer VJ. Traumatic dental injuries among schoolchildren in Valencia, Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16 (2): 292-295.

  3. Velásquez V, Álvarez M. Tratamiento pulpar en la apexificación de dientes inmaduros mediante agregado trióxido mineral. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2009; 12 (1): 29-32.

  4. Zogheib L, Pereira J, Valle A, Oliveira J, Pegoraro L. Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with composite resin and glass fiber post. Braz Dent J. 2008; 19 (4): 329-333.

  5. Morales N, González C. Estudio in vitro comparativo de la resistencia a la fractura radicular en dientes inmaduros y obturados con dos cementos endodónticos. Rev CES Odont. 1998; 11 (1): 9-15.

  6. Goldberg F, Kaplan A, Roitman M, Manfre S, Picca M. Reinforcing effect of a resin glass ionomer in the restoration of immature roots in vitro. Dent Traumatol. 2002; 18: 70-72.

  7. Pene JR, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. Evaluation of fiber-composite laminate in the restoration of immature, nonvital maxillary central incisors. J Endod. 2001; 27 (1): 18-22.

  8. Hemalatha H, Sandeep M, Kulkarni S, Sheikh S. Evaluation of fracture resistance in simulated immature teeth using resilon and rib bond as root reinforcements-an in vitro study. Dent Traumatol. 2009; 25: 433-438.

  9. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 360-367.

  10. AL-Wahadni AM, Hamdan S, Al-Omiri M, Hammad MM, Hatamleh MM. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems: in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106: 77-83.

  11. Morgano S, Rodrigues A, Sabrosa C. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48 (2): 397-416.

  12. Musikant BL, Cohen BI, Deutsch AS. Post design and the optimally restored endodontically treated tooth. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003; 24 (10): 788-792, 794-796.

  13. Okuma M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Itoh S, Ikeda M, Foxton RM et al. Effect of composite post placement on bonding to root canal dentin using 1-step self-etch dual-cure adhesive with chemical activation mode. Dent Mater J. 2010; 29 (6): 642-648.

  14. Carvalho CA, Valera MC, Oliveira LD, Camargo CH. Structural resistance in immature teeth using root reinforcements in vitro. Dent Traumatol. 2005; 21 (3): 155-159.

  15. Makade CS, Meshram GK, Warhadpande M, Patil PG. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems-an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3 (2): 90-95.

  16. Tjan AH, Wang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowels chanels with various thicknesses of bucal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53 (4): 496-500.

  17. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA Jr. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int. 1996; 27 (7): 483-491.

  18. Katebzadeh N, Dalton BC, Trope M. Strengthening immature teeth during and after apexification. J Endod. 1998; 24 (4): 256-259.

  19. Liang B, Chen Y, Wu X, Yip K, Smales R. Fracture resistance of roots with thin walls restored using an intermediate resin composite layer placed between the dentine and a cast metal post. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2007; 15 (1): 19-22.

  20. Wu X, Chan AT, Chen YM, Yip KH, Smales RJ. Effectiveness and dentin bond strengths of two materials for reinforcing thin-walled roots. Dent Mater. 2007; 23 (4): 479-485.

  21. Kivanç BH, Alaçam T, Ulusoy OI, Genç O, Görgül G. Fracture resistance of thin-walled roots restored with different post systems. Int Endod J. 2009; 42 (11): 997-1003.

  22. Goncalves LA, Vansan LP, Paulino SM, Sousa MD. Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with a transilluminating post and adhesive restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96 (5): 339-344.

  23. Maccari P, Cosme D, Oshima H, Burnett L, Shinkai R. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007; 19 (1): 30-36.

  24. Quintana M, Castilla M, Matta C. Resistencia a la fractura frente a carga estática transversal en piezas dentarias restauradas con espigo-muñón colado, postes de fibra de carbono y de aleación de titanio. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2005; 15 (1): 24-29.

  25. Fraga R, Chaves B, Mello G, Siqueira Jr J. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots after restoration. J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25 (11): 809-813.

  26. Fukui Y, Komada W, Yoshida K, Otake S, Okada D, Miura H. Effect of reinforcement with resin composite on fracture strength of structurally compromised roots. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28 (5): 602-609.

  27. Vallejo M, Maya C, Martínez N. Resistencia a la fractura de dientes con debilitamiento radicular. Rev CES Odont. 2011; 24 (1): 59-69.

  28. Vano M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tognini F, Gabriele M, Tay FR et al. The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores: the evaluation of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. Int Endod J. 2006; 39 (1): 31-39.

  29. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of mendodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89 (4): 368-373.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com