medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3194 (Electronic)

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Ciencias Médicas 2015; 19 (2)

Assisted reproduction

Fernández BH, Gerez MS, Pineda BA

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 367-373
PDF size: 128.90 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: among assisted reproduction techniques of low technology is intrauterine insemination, where sperm is placed in the uterus of a woman near the time of ovulation.
Case report: The case of a female 31-year-old patient, white skin, of rural origin (Minas de Matahambre Municipality, Pinar del Rio, Cuba) presents for the sole personal history of secondary infertility and obstetric geostation 1, delivery 0, abortion 1 to 18, with Copper T IUD for nine years for which she was served with her partner in the office of infertility at Hermanos Cruz university polyclinic of Pinar del Rio, where she was diagnosed disorders ovulation and vaginal infection and her partner with a left varicocele oligoasthenospermia, which led to combined surgical treatment.
Conclusion: varicocelectomy was first achieved and spermatogenesis with merapur (HMG), ovulation with HMG and clomiphene, and then a low-tech fertilization took place, bringing a pregnancy, which came to fruition at 41 weeks of gestation was achieved. So this kind of risky pregnancy and was happy result, it was decided to publish the case.


REFERENCES

  1. Calero JL, Santana F. La infertilidad como evento de frustración personal. Reflexiones de un grupo de varones de parejas infértiles. Rev Cubana Endocrinol. 2006 Abr; 17(1).

  2. Díaz Bernal Z, García Jordá D. La perspectiva de género y la relación médico-paciente para el problema de la infertilidad. Rev Cubana Salud Pública. 2011 Mar; 37(1).

  3. Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Meyn LA, Amortegui AJ, Sweet RL. Subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 37-43.

  4. Ferrero Aymerich A. La infertilidad en Costa Rica debe abordarse como un problema de salud pública. Acta méd. Costarric. 2012; 54 (2): [Aprox. 3p.].

  5. Fernández Borbón H, Valle Rivera T, Fernández Ramos I, Ramírez Pérez N. Caracterización de la infertilidad en el municipio Pinar del Río. Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2013 Oct; 17(5): [Aprox. 9p.].

  6. Koli P, et al. Intrauterine insemination: a retrospective review on determinants of success. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 2(3): [Aprox. 4p.].

  7. Mohan S K, Priya B, TK Aleyamma, Raju N, Chandy A, Mangalaraj AM, et al. Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination: A prospective study of factors affecting outcome. Journal Human Reprod Sci. 2010 Sep-Dec; 3(3): [Aprox. 5p.].

  8. Álvares Fumero R. Combate Cuba envejecimiento. Portal de Salud y Envejecimiento en las Américas.

  9. Pappachen M, Mallika A. Study of Factors Affecting the Success of Intra Uterine Insemination in Pregnancy. International Journal of Scientific Study. October 2014; 2(7): [Aprox. 4p.].

  10. Manzur A, Macaya R, Gajardo G. Inseminación intrauterina en mayores de 38 años, ¿vale la pena? Rev. peru. ginecol. Obstet. 2012; 58(1).

  11. Rojas Quintana P. Embarazo múltiple. Presentación de un caso: Una propuesta de indicadores. MediSur. 2009 Oct; 7(5): [Aprox. 36p.].




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com