medigraphic.com

2003, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Cir Cir 2003; 71 (6)

Computer-assisted surgery. The proposal of a surgical classification

Mosso-Vázquez JL

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 492-495
PDF size: 85.91 Kb.


ABSTRACT

I present a proposal for a surgical classification in computer assisted surgery (CAS), with a surgical point of view to facilitate understanding and physicians, scientists, for and engineer to be able to communicate. I considered the system’s participation into the CAS definition. In this classification, I find: simulated surgery, guided surgery, assisted surgery telepresence surgery, and semi-automated surgery. I describe the systems for each.


REFERENCES

  1. Bielser D, Gross HM. Open surgery simulation. In: Westwood DJ, et al, editors. Medicine meets virtual reality. Newport Beach, CA, USA: IOS 2002.pp.57-63.

  2. Mastrangelo MJ Jr, et al. Advancements in immersive VR as a tool for preoperative planning for laparoscopic surgery. In: Westwood DJ, et al, editors. Medicine meets virtual reality. Newport Beach, CA, USA: IOS; 2002.pp.274-279.

  3. Haluck SR, Gallagher GA, Satava MR, Webster R, Bass LT, Miller A. Reliability and validity of endotower a virtual reality trainer for angled endoscope navigation. In: Westwood DJ, et al, editors. Medicine meets virtual reality. Newport Beach, CA, USA: IOS; 2002.pp.179-184.

  4. Webster R, et al. Elastically deformable 3D organs for haptic surgical simulation. In: Westwood DJ, et al, editors. Medicine meets virtual reality. Newport Beach, CA, USA: IOS; 2002.pp.570-572.

  5. Kovukangas J, Louhisalmi Y, Alakuijala J, Oikarien J. Ultrasound-controlled neuronavigator guided brain surgery. J Neurosurg 1993;79:36-42.

  6. Kansy K, et al. LOCALITE- A frame neuronavigation system for interventional magnetic resonance imaging system. In: Taylor C, Colchester A, editors. Medical image computing and assisted intervention-MICCAI´99. Berlin: Springer; 1999.pp.832-841.

  7. Brandt G, Radermacher K, Lavalle S, Staudte HW, Rau G. In: Troccaz J, Grimson R, Mosges R, editors. A compact robot for image guided orthopedic surgery: concept and preliminary results. Lectures notes in computer science 1205, CVRMed. MRCAS 97. Grenoble, France: Springer; 1997.pp.767-776.

  8. Kienzle MT, Stulberg D, Pehkin M, Quaid A, Lea J, Goswami A, Wu C. A computer-assisted total knee replacement surgical system using a calibrated robot. In: Taylor E, Lavalle S, Burdea, Morges, editors. Computer integrated surgery. Massachussets, USA. MIT Press; 1996.pp.410-416.

  9. Sackier JM, Wang Y. Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1994;8:63-66.

  10. Mosso VJL, Minor MA, Lara VV. Brazo robótico para sujetar y posicionar laparoscopios. Primer diseño y construcción en México. Cir General 2001;69:295-299.

  11. Simon IB. Surgery 2001, concept of the presence surgery. Surg Endosc 1993;7:462-463.

  12. Rininsland HH. Basis of robotics and manipulators in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied-Technol 1995;3:154-159.

  13. Satava RM, Simon IB. Teleoperation, telerobotic and telepresence in surgery. Endosc Surg Allied-Technol 1993;1:151-153.

  14. Arambula CF, Davies BL. Automated prostate recognition: a key process for clinical effective robotic prostatectomy. Med Biol Engin Comput 1999;37:236-243.

  15. Kline-Schoder R, Finger W, Hogan N. High performance telerobot control. In: Westwood DJ, et al, editors. Medicine meets virtual reality. Newport Beach, CA, USA: IOS; 2002.pp.234-236.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com