medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2937 (Print)

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2015; 21 (1)

Woman´s coronary artery desease in Cardiovascular Institute

Borges MYR, Nápoles SI, Batista HE, Hechavarría PS, Guevara MG, Borges MYC

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 3-8
PDF size: 444.88 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Coronary arterial disease is one of the fatal leading causes in women all over the world. But many of them undervalue the threat that this constitutes for their health, having different incidence, evolution and forecast in terms of sex, what has harmed significantly the woman since three of every 10 deaths that take place in the feminine population are health-related cardiovascular.
Objective: To determine behavior of coronary artery desease in women in the Cardiovascular Institute during the year 2013.
Methodologic design: An observational, descriptive, transversal study was done using a population of 532 patients from which a sample of 345 were selected using the EPIDAT statistics program. Descriptive statistics were used the results were presented as test and graphs.
Results: The 38 % positioned themselves in the age bracket from 60 to 69 years, high blood pressure was in number one factor of risk with 62.3 %, the increment of the age associates to the affection of multiple glasses in a 37.9 % associating to the affection of trunk, in 54.4 % of the sample ICP regardless of the type had total success of injury.
Conclusion: The bigger patients of 60 years were the largely affected associating to the affection of multiple glasses.


REFERENCES

  1. Mosca L, Banka CL, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bushnell C, Do-lor RJ et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the preven-tion of cardiovascular disease in women 2011 update: A guideline from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 123(11): 1243–1262.

  2. Redberg RF. Cardiovascular disease in women: Expert re-view. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010; 8(2):141-2.

  3. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Anuario Estadístico de Cuba [Internet]. La Habana: Ecimed; 2009 [citado 21 Junio 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.one cu/aec 2009/esp/20080618 index.htm.

  4. Claassen M, Sybrandy KC, Appelman YE, Asselbergs FW. Gender gap in acute coronary heart disease: Myth or reality? World J Cardiol. 2012; 4:36–47.

  5. Zhang Z, Fang J, Gillespie C, Wang G, Hong Y, Yoon PW. Age-specific gende differences in in-hospital mortality by type of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol . 2012; 109:1097–103.

  6. Steg PG, Greenlaw N, Tardif JC, Tendera M, Ford I, Kaab S, et al. Women and men with stable coronary ar-tery disease have similar clinical outcomes: insights from the international prospective CLARIFY registry. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:2831–40.

  7. Rubiera R, Lara A, Ivan N, Palacio H, Vignier D. Síndrome coronario agudo Clínico epidemiológico a propósito de nues-tro primer año. Rev Cubana de Medicina Intensiva y emer-gencias(internet 2009.) citado 2011 Jul 04;8(3):http//Bvs.sld.cu/Revistas/mie/Vol 8 3 09/mie07309htm

  8. Cardiopatía isquémica en la mujer. Datos del estudio CIBAR. Cartas científicas/Rev Esp Cardiol.2012; 65(11):1054-1065. Documento descargado de http://www.revespcardiol.org el 02/06/2014.

  9. Nazzal C, Alonso F. Las mujeres jóvenes en Chile tienen ele-vado riesgo de muerte intrahospitalaria por infarto de mio-cardio. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2013;66: 104-9. - Vol. 66 Núm.02 DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2012.07.015.

  10. Antman EM, Braunwald E. Infarto Agudo del miocardio. En Braunwald E. Tratado de Cardiología. 8va ed. España: Edito-rial Elsevier; 2009. p.1364-66.

  11. Jimenez-Candil J,Diaz Castro O, Barrrabés JA, Garcia de la Villa B, Bodi Peris V, López Palop R et al. Actualización en Cardiopatía Isquémica y cuidados Críticos Cardiológicos. Rev Esp Cardiol.2013;66(3):198-204

  12. Escobar C y Barrios V. Cardiopatía isquémica y mujer: son necesaria más respuestas. Rev Esp Car-diol.2012;65(11):1066-1067

  13. Reina A, Colmenero M, Aguayo de Hoyos E, Arós F, Martí H, Claramonte R, et al. On behalf of the PRIAMHO II inves-tigators. Gender differences in management and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2007; 116 (3-4): 389-395

  14. Bonet A, Bardají A. Variabilidad en el tratamiento del síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del ST y sus conse-cuencias. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011; 11(Supl.A):8-13.

  15. Conde-vela CN, Moreno R, Hernández R, Pérez vizcaíno MG, Alfonso F, Escande J et al. Shock cardiogénico en la admisión en pacientes con enfermedad multivaso e infarto agudo de miocardio tratados con intervención coronaria percutánea: factores relacionados. Revista Peruana de Cardio-logía Vol. XXXIII Nº 3

  16. Bowker TJ, Turner RM, Wood DA, Roberts TL, Curzen N, M, et al. A national Survey of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischaemia (SAMII) in the UK: characteristics, manage-ment and in-hospital outcome in women compared to men in patients under 70 years. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21:1458-63.

  17. Pérez-Iruela JA, Pastor P, Lumbreras L, Martín AM, Ruiz FJ,Posadas A, Puentes C. Valor diagnóstico de la perfusión miocÆrdica SPECT con dipiridamol en una población feme-nina. Revista Argentina de Cardiología / Vol 77 N” 5 / septiembre - octubre 2009

  18. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T et al. Guía de práctica clínica sobre revascularización miocárdica. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63(12):1485.e1-e76

  19. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GB, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic bur-den: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascula-rization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008; 117:1283-91.

  20. Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casserly IP, Schneider JP, Topol EJ, Lauer MS. Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation. 2004; 109:2290-5.

  21. Cabadés Rumbeu C, Díaz Gil JL, Mármol Lozano MR, Aguar Carrascosa P, Sanmiguel Cervera D, Ferrando Cer-velló J. Diferencias de género en el tratamiento y pronóstico de pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo y enfermedad multivaso sometidos a intervencionismo percutáneo. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63 Supl 3:183

  22. Naik H, White AJ, Chakravarty T, Forrester J, Fontana G, Kar S, Shah PK, Weiss RE, Makkar R. A meta-analysi of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary interven-tion or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery ste-nosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2: 739-47.

  23. Park DW, Seung KB, Kim YH, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Kang SJ, Lee et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main co-ronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Co-ronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) regi-stry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:117-24.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com