2002, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Vet Mex 2002; 33 (1)
Some aspects on poultry coccidiosis in the area of Coatzacoalcos in the State of Veracruz in Mexico
Moreno DR, Ibarra VF
Language: English/Spanish
References: 18
Page: 63-71
PDF size: 223.60 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The present study was aimed at finding out about the age of maximum oocyst elimination, and the relation on quantity average elimination relative to environmental humidity, as well as to determine the species of Eimeria, and their frequency during eight productive cycles on broiler chicken houses in commercial farms under normal handling conditions and anticoccidial use at the poultry area of Coatzacoalcos in the State of Veracruz in Mexico. Samples of fresh droppings of representative chicken houses from seven farms of the area were simultaneously studied from the second to the seventh week of age. Positive samples were quantified and identified by flotation and McMaster methods. Results indicated that the mean age of maximum oocyst elimination in the chicken was of 28 days. Oocyst average showed a direct relation with a relative humidity present in the productive cycles. Species identified and their mean average frequency were: E. tenella, 57%; E. acervulina, 17%; E. brunetti, 13%; and E. maxima, 13%. E. tenella was the most common species in all studied farms, E. acervulina came in second place in four farms, E. brunetti in two, and E. maxima in one.
REFERENCES
1. Von Voeten AC, Braunius WW. Subclinical coccidiosis in broiler. A comparative investigation of detection methods. Archiv Geflügelkd 1981;45:189-193.
2. Braunius WW. Epidemiology of Eimeria in broiler flocks and the effect of anticoccidial drugs on the economic performance. Avian Pathol 1983;12:23-33 .
3. Graat EAM. Effects of initial litter contamination level with Eimeria acervulina on population dynamics and production characteristics in broilers. Vet Parasitol 1966;65:223-232.
4. Henken AM. Description of a simulation model for the population dynamics of Eimeria acervulina infection in broilers. Parasitology 1994;108:503-512.
5. Bafundo KW. Diferencia entre ionóforos anticoccidiales, consideraciones prácticas y expectativas realistas. Memorias del III Seminario sobre Nutrición y Patología Aviar; 1995 marzo 17; Juriquilla (Querétaro) México. México (DF): Laboratorios. Pfizer S.A. de C.V., 1995:13-17.
6. McDougald LR. Chemotherapy of coccidiosis. Proceedings of the VIth International Coccidiosis Conference; 1993 June 21-25; Guelph, Canada. Guelph, Canada: Department of Pathology University of Guelph, 1993:45-47.
7. Ryley JF. Screening for and evaluation of anticoccidial activity. Adv Pharmacol Chemother 1980;17:1-23 .
8. Stayer PA, Pote LM, Keirs RW. A comparison of Eimeria oocysts isolated from litter and faecal samples from broiler houses in two farms with different management schemes during one growout. Poultry Sci 1995;74:26-32.
9. Fayer R, Reid WM. Control of coccidiosis. In: Long PL, editor. The biology of the coccidia. Athens (Ga): Department of Poultry Science, 1982:453-487.
10. Mathieu H. Strategies for coccidiosis control. Poultry Int 1994; (November):43-52.
11. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Desarrollo Rural. Servicio Meteorológico Nacional, Dirección de Geografía y Meteorología. Registros mensuales. México (DF): Servicio Meteorológico Nacional, 1999.
12. Moreno DR. Diferencias en resultados entre los métodos de muestreo de cama y heces frescas en dicromato de K en el diagnóstico de la coccidiosis aviar. Memorias de la XXII Convención Anual de la ANECA; 1997 mayo 7-11; Ixtapa, Zihuatanejo (Gro.) México. México (DF): Asociación Nacional de Especialistas en Ciencias Avícolas, 1997;176-179.
13. Hodson JN. Coccidiosis: oocyst counting technique for coccidiostat evaluation. Exp Parasitol 1970;28:99-102.
14. Janssen Pharmaceutica. Diagnosis of coccidiosis in chickens. Manual Beerse, Belgium: Janssen Pharmaceutica, 1990:1-33.
15. Long PL, Reid WM. A guide for the diagnosis of coccidiosis in chickens. Research Report 404. Athens (Ga): College of Agriculture Experimental Station University of Georgia, 1982.
16. Moreno DR. Determinación del grado de patogenicidad de algunas cepas de Eimeria aisladas de pollos en México. Vet Méx 1980;2:1-7.
17. Daniel WW. Bioestadística, base para el análisis de las ciencias de la salud. 3ª ed. México (DF): Limusa, 1999.
18. Microsoft Corporation. Statisics for Windows. Release 5.1. Tulsa (OK): Microsoft Corporation, 1997.