Rodríguez BS, Leyva QA, Valdés RM, Almeida GJ, Ponte GG, García HRA

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 123-130
PDF size: 397.50 Kb.

ABSTRACT

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;16:3-6

2. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial coronary artery angioplasty. Circulation. 1993; 88: I-251.

3. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Am Heart J. 1994; 128:167-74.

4. Caputo RP, Tremmel JA, Rao S, Gilchrist IC, Pyne C, Pancholy S, et al. Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral proce-dures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheter CardiovascInterv. 2011; 78:823–39.

5. Dehmer GJ, Weaver D, Roe MT, Milford Beland S, Fitzgerald S, Hermann A, et al. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac cathe-terization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the Cath PCI Registry of the National Cardio-vascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(20): 2017–31.

6. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the im-pact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009; 157:132-40.

7. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and interven-tion in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a random-ised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011; 377:1409-20.

8. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, Roe MT, Brindis R, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Trends in the Prevalence and Outcomes of Radial and Femoral Ap-proaches to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 1; 379-86.

9. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Associa-tion task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascu-lar angiography and interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:e44–122.

10. Feldman D, Swaminathan R, Kaltenbach L, Baklanov D, Kim L, Chiu Wong S, et al. Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Out-comes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. An Updated Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007–2012). Circulation. 2013; 127: 2295-306

11. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, et al. Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: The RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60:2481-9.

12. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, et al. Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: The RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60:2481-9. 12. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, Nolan J, Ludwig J, Tubaro M, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Associ-ation of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European So-ciety of Cardiology. Euro Intervention 2013; published online Jan 28. PII:20130115-02

13. Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, Fath Ordoubadi F, Neyses L, Louvard Y, et al. Influence of access site selection on PCI-related ad-verse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart. 2012; 98(4):303-11.

14. Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J, Mates M, Pesek J, Ostadal P, et al.ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(10):964–72.

15. Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocar-dial infarction patients: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll CardiolIntv. 2013; 6:814–23.

16. Shah A, Anderson R,Mitra R, Choudhury A,Ossei-Gerning N, Penny W, et al.Radial Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interven-tion:Single Centre Experience. JACC. Cardiovascular intervention. 2014;7(25)Suppl s

17. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial coronary artery angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1995;129:1-7

18. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, Klinke WP, Carere RG, Pi D, et al. The association of arterial access site at angioplasty with transfu-sion and mortality the M.O.R.T.A.L study: (Mortality benefit of Re-duced Transfusion after PCI via the Arm or Leg). Heart. 2008; 94:1019- 25.

19. Almeida Gómez J. Evaluación clínica y económica de los abordajes-radial y femoral en el cateterismo cardiaco. [Tesis para aspirar al gradode Doctor en Ciencias Médicas]. La Habana. Universidad Mé-dica de laHabana. 2012. Disponible en:http://tesis.repo.sld.cu/view/divisions/c=5Fc=5Fmed=5Fcar/2012.html

20. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, Blaesing L, Burket MW, Basu A, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of car-diac catheterization: A randomized comparison. Am Heart J. 1999; 138:430-6.L.

21. Hess C, Peterson E, Neely M, Dai D, Hillegass W, Krucoff M, et al. The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interven-tion Among Operators in the United States: A Study From the Na-tional Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation.2014; 129: 2277-86.

22. Spaulding C, Lefèvre T, Funck F, Thébault B, Chauveau M, Ben Hamda K, et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: re-sults of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996; 39:365–70.

23. Looi JL, Cave A, El-Jack S. Learning curve in transradial coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 108:1092–95.

24. Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS, Hong T, Kutryk MJ, Graham JJ, et al. Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4:336–341.

25. Bundhoo Sh, Nallur-Shivu G, Kinnaird T, Anderson R. Changing from a Predominant Transfemoral to Transradial Access Site Percutane-ous Coronary Intervention Centre (PCI): Less Vascular Complica-tions, Shortened Lengths of Stay - The Way Forward? Circula-tion.2012; 126: A15219

26. Balwanz CR, Javed U, Singh GD, Armstrong EJ, Southard JA, Wong GB, et al. Transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography and in-terventions: 1-year outcomes after initiating the transradial approach in a cardiology training program. Am Heart J. 2013; 165(3):310-60.

27. Turner S, Sacrinty M, Manogue M, Little W, Gandhi S, Kutcher M, et al.Transitioning to the radial artery as the preferred access site for cardiac catheterization: an academic medical center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 80:247–257.

28. Jolly SS, Cairns J, Yusuf S, Niemela K, Steg PG, Worthley M, et al. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014; 63(10); 954-63.

29. Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS, Hong T, Kutryk MJ, Graham JJ, et al.Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. CircCardiovascInterv. 2011; 4(4):336–41.

30. Dawn Abbott J. The Pace of Transradial Procedural Learn-ing.Circulation.2014; 129: 2250-2252.

31. Burzotta F, Trani C, Mazzari MA, Tommasino A, Niccoli G, Porto I, et al. Vascular complications and access crossover in 10,676 transradi-al percutaneous coronary procedures. Am Heart J. 2012; 163:230–238.

32. From AM, Bell MR, Rihal CS, Gulati R. Minimally invasive transradial intervention using sheathless standard guiding catheters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78:866–71.