medigraphic.com
Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

2014, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2014; 59 (4)

Revisional medialization laryngoplasty: Findings, indications and results

Jiménez-Fandino LH, Wuesthoff C, Barreto T

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 262-275
PDF size: 789.06 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Thyroplasty is currently the most commonly performed type of laryngeal framework surgery, and its surgical indications are gradually being expanded and becoming well known among ENT surgeons around the world. However, because it is a relatively new technique, its most frequent complications as well as its revision causes are still a matter of study. There is still no consensus on its revision or complication rates. We present a series of cases of revisional medialization laryngoplasty focusing on its initial technique, its intraoperative findings and the method(s) used in its correction.


REFERENCES

  1. Rosen CA, Simpson CB. Operative techniques in laryngology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.

  2. Isshiki N, Morita H, Okamura H, Hiramoto M. Thyroplasty as a new phonosurgical technique. Acta Otolaryngol 1974;78:451-457.

  3. Young N, Zullo T, Rosen CA. Analysis of laryngeal framework surgery: 10-year follow-up to a national survey. Laryngoscope 2010;120:1602-1608.

  4. Friedrich G. Externe stimmlippenmedialisation: Operative erfahrungen und modifikationen. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1998;77:7-17.

  5. Storck C, Fischer C, Cecon M, Schmid S, et al. Hydroxyapatite versus titanium implant: Comparison of the functional outcome after vocal fold medialization in unilateral recurrent nerve paralysis. Head Neck 2010;32:1605-1612.

  6. Woo P, Pearl AW, Hsiung MW, Som P. Failed mediialization laryngoplasty: Management by revision surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:615-621.

  7. Leder SB, Sasaki CT. Long-term changes in vocal quality following Isshiki thyroplasty type I. Laryngoscope 1994;104:275-277.

  8. Isshiki N, Okamura H, Ishikawa T. Thyroplasty type I (lateral compression) for dysphonia due to vocal cord paralysis or atrophy. Acta Otolaryngol 1975;80:465-473.

  9. Anderson TD, Spiegel JR, Sataloff RT. Thyroplasty revisions: Frequency and predictive factors. J Voice 2003;17:442-448.

  10. Cohen J, Bates G. Gore-Tex revision medialization laryngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131:236-240.

  11. Zeitels SM. New procedures for paralytic dysphonia: adduction arytenopexy, goretex medialization laryngoplasty, and cricothyroid subluxation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000;33:841-854.

  12. Andrews BT, Van Daele DJ, Karnell MJ, McCulloch TM, et al. Evaluation of open approach and injection laryngoplasty in revision thyroplasty procedures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:226-232.

  13. Scwartz K, Cielo CA, Steffen N, Becker J, et al. Voice and laryngeal configuration of men with unilateral vocal fold paralysis before and after medialization. J Voice 2011;25:611- 618.

  14. Abraham MT, Gonen M, Kraus D. Complications of thyroplasty type I and arytenoid adduction. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1322-1329.

  15. Hoffman M, Witt RE, McCulloch TM, Jiang J. Preliminary investigation of adjustable balloon implant for type one thyroplasty. Laryngoscope 2011;121:793-800.

  16. Blumin JH, Merati AL. Laryngeal reinnervation with nervenerve anastomosis versus laryngeal framework surgery alone: A comparison of safety. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:217-220.

  17. Rosen CA. Complications in phonosurgery: Results of a national survey. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1697-1703.

  18. Cotter SS, Avidano MA, Crary MA, Cassisi NJ, Gorham MM. Laryngeal complication after type I thyroplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:671-673.

  19. Rosen C, Murry T, DeMarino DP. Late complication of thyroplasty type I: Case report. J Voice 1999;13:417-423.

  20. Maragos NE. Revision thyroplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;110:1087-1092.

  21. Kraus DH, Orllkoff RF, Rizk SS, Rosenberg DB. Arytenoid adduction as an adjunct to type I thyroplasty for unialteral coal cord paralysis. Head Neck 1999;21:52-59.

  22. Kauffman JA, Postma G. Revision laryngoplasty. Operative techniques in otolaryngology. Head Neck Surg 1999;10.

  23. Durucu C, Kanlikama M, Membuc S, Bayazit Y, et al. Medialization laryngoplasty with Gore-Tex®: An animal study. J Voice 2007;21:632-639.

  24. Mortensen M, Carroll M. Arytenoid adduction with medialization laryngoplasty versus injection or medialization laryngoplasty: The role of the arytenoidopexy. Laryngoscope 2009;119:827-831.

  25. Nouwen J, Hans S, De Mones E, Brasnu D, et al. Thyroplasty type I without arytenoid adduction in patients with unilateral laryngeal nerve paralysis: The Montgomery implant versus the Gore-Tex implant. Acta Otolaryngologica 2004;124:723-738.

  26. Van Ardenne N, Vanderwegen J, Van Nuffelen, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P. Medialization thyroplasty: vocal outcome of silicone versus titanium impnat. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:101-107.

  27. Suehiro A, Hirano S, Kishimoto Y, Tanaka S, Ford CM. Comparative study of vocal outcomes with silicone versus Gore-Tex thyroplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009;118:405-408.

  28. Czerwonka L, Ford CN, Machi AT, Leverson GE, Jiang JJ. A-P positioning of medialization thyroplasty in an excised larynx model. Laryngoscope 2009;119:591-596.

  29. Li AJ, Johns MM, Jackson-Menaldi C, Dailey S, et al. Glottic closure patterns: type I thyroplasty versus type I thyroplasty with arytenoid adduction. J Voice 2011;25:259-264.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com