medigraphic.com
Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2014; 19 (3)

Analysis of the personality of the patient with facial deformity

Guerra-Delgado ME, Pacheco-Ruiz LL, Duarte-Ronces MA, Joya-Laureano L, Meza-Dávalos EG, Rojo-Alonso C

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 272-278
PDF size: 443.59 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The facial deformity presents as asymmetry, hypoplasia, excessive growth, facial clefts, among others, as well as syndromes of the head and neck where alterations of the facial structures that can occur with clefts of the face.
Material and methods: Analysis of personality was conducted in a sample of patients with facial deformities of maxillofacial surgery service at CMN “20 de Noviembre”, studying patients in protocol of orthognathic surgery using the Inventory Multiphasic Personality Minnesota 2 (MMPI2), no significant deviation was found in the results of analyzes, such as undiscovered psychopathology.
Results: Presenting a correlation in the difficulty of adaptation of patients to a change in the way they perceive their self-image.


REFERENCES

  1. Flanary Carolyn. The psycology of appearence and psycological impact of surgical alteration of the face, Modern practice in orthognatic surgery, William Bell, Cap 1 Vol 1, pp. 3-17.

  2. Cash TF, Kehr JA, Polyson J, Freeman V. The role of physical attractivness in peer attribution of psycological disturbance. J consult Clin Psychol 1997;45:987-993.

  3. Dion KK, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc psychol 1972;24:285-290.

  4. Goldman W, Lewis P. Beautiful is good: Evidence that the physically attractive are more socially skifull. J exp soc Psychol 1977;13:125-130.

  5. Jackson DJ, Houston TL. Physical attractiveness and assertiveness. J Soc Psychol 1975;96:7948.

  6. Krebs D, Adinolfi AA. Physical attractiveness, social relations, and personality style. J Pers Soc Psychol 1975;31:245- 253.

  7. Miller AG: Role os physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonom Sci 1970;19:241-243.

  8. Snyder M, Ruthbart M: communicator attractivennes and opinión change. Cum J Behav Sci 1971;3:377-387.

  9. MacGregor FC: social and psychological implications of dentofacial disfigurement. Angle Orthod 1970;40:231-233.

  10. Archer RP, Cash TF: Physical attractiveness and maladjusment among psychiatric patientes. J Soc Clin Psychol 1985;3:170-180.

  11. Aronson E, Mette DR: Dishonest behavior as a function of differential levels of inducted self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol 1968;9:121-127.

  12. Lerner RM, karabenik SA: physical attrctiveness, body atitudes and self concep in late adolescents, J Youth Adol 1974;3:307-316.

  13. Knorr Nj, Hoopes JE, Edgerton MT: pshichiatric surgical approach to adolescent disturbance in self image. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;41:248-253.

  14. Dion KK: Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children´s transgressions. J Pers Soc Psychol 1972;24:207-213.

  15. Stephan CW, Langlois JH: Baby beautiful: Adult attributoins of infant comptence as function of infant attractivennes. Child Dev 1984;55:576-585.

  16. Alley T. head shape and perception of cuteness. Dev Psychol 1981;17:650-654.

  17. Hilderbrant KA, Fitzgerald HE. Facial feature determiannts of perceive infant attractiveness. Infant behav Dev 1979;2:329-339.

  18. Power TG, hildebrant KA, Fitzgerald HE. Adults repsonses to infant varying in facial exporesion and perceived attractiveness. Infant behav Dev 1982;5:33-44.

  19. Corter C, Trehub S, Boukydis C, et al. Nurse´s judgements of attractiveness of premature infants. Infant behav Dev 1978;1:373-380.

  20. Clifford MM, Walster E. The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. Social educ 1973;46:248-258.

  21. Richardson SA, Koller H, Kalz M. Appearence and mental ratardation: Some first spetps in teh development and application of a measure. AM J Ment Def 1985;89:475- 484.

  22. Cash TF, Begley PJ, mcDown DA, Weise BC: When counselors are Heard but not seen: Initial impact of physical attractiveness. J Counsel Psychol 1975;22:273-279.

  23. Berscheid E, Walster E. Physical attractiveness. In Berkowitz L (ed) advances in experimental social psychology. Vol 7. New York: academis press, 1974.

  24. Brundage LE, Derlega VJ, Cash TF. The effects of physical attractiveness and need for approval on self-disclosure. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1977;3:63-66.

  25. Barocas R, Karoly P: Effects of physical appearence on ocial responsiveness. Phychol rep 1972;31:495-500.

  26. Farina A, Burns GL, Austad C, et al: The role of physical attractiveness in readjusment of discharged psychiatric patuients. J Abnorm Psychol 1986;95:139-143.

  27. Napoleon T, Chassin L, Young RD. A replication and extention of physical attractiveness and mental Illnes. J Abnorm Psychol 1980;89:250-253.

  28. O´Grady KE. Sex, physical attractiveness, and perceid risk for mental illness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1982;43:1064-1071.

  29. Williams DM, Bentley R, Cobourne MT, et al: Psychological characteristics of women who require orthognathic surgery:Comparison with untreated controls. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;47:191.

  30. Marcelo Weissbluth Frejman, DDS, MSc, Ivana Ardenghi Vargas, DDS, MSc, PhD,* Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing, DDS, MSc, PhD, and Luciane Quadrado Closs, DDS, MSc, PhD. Dentofacial Deformities Are Associated With Lower Degrees of Self-Esteem and Higher Impact on Oral Health- Related Quality of Life: Results From an Observational Study Involving Adults, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012.

  31. Cunningham SJ, Gilthorpe MS, Hunt NP: Are orthognathic patients different? Eur J Orthod 2000;22:195.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com