medigraphic.com

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2014; 37 (3)

Simulation in anesthesia: the importance of debriefing

García-Soto N, Nazar-Jara C, Corvetto-Aqueveque M

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 201-205
PDF size: 198.92 Kb.


ABSTRACT

In recent years, clinical simulation has been incorporated as an integral part of the curriculum of medical education in some countries. In this kind of learning, the simulated experience is a fundamental element, being the debriefing the essential support for this style of teaching is effective. The debriefing is used as a guided reflection after a simulation, and aims to analyze, make sense and learn from the simulated experience, being an essential step in the learning process. There are several proposed models for this reflection immediately after the clinical simulation, being the best known described by Jenny Rudolph, called «debriefing with good judgment», which we used routinely in our centre. Despite extensive evidence supporting the use of simulation as part of medical education, the experience currently available on debriefing after simulated scenarios is scarce in Anesthesiology, demanding more research about it, in order to find solid and valid results in this matter.


REFERENCES

  1. http://buscon.rae.es/drae/?val=simular

  2. Gaba DM. Improving reality. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:491-494.

  3. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:i2-10.

  4. Carpentio LJ. A lifetime commitment: mandatory continuing education. Nurs Times. 1991;87:53-55.

  5. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1984.

  6. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;11:1010-1016.

  7. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2:115-125.

  8. Rall M, Manser T, Haward S. Key elements of debriefing for simulator training. Eur J Anesthesiol. 2000;17:516-517.

  9. Kolb DA, Fry R. Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In: Cooper C (ed.). Theories of Group Process. London: John Wiley; 1975.

  10. Pearson M, Smith D. Debriefing in experience-based learning. Simulation/Games for Learning. 1986;16:155-172.

  11. Dyregrov A. Caring for helpers in disaster situation: Psychological debriefing. Disaster Manage. 1989;2:25-30.

  12. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne R, et al. There’s no such thing as “Non judgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthcare. 2006;1:49-55.

  13. Kolb DA. The learning style inventory LSI Learning style inventory version 3. Boston: TRG Hay/McBer Training Resources Group; 1999.

  14. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27:10-28.

  15. McGaghie W, Issenberg S, Petrusa E, Scalese R. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Medical Education. 2010;44:50-63.

  16. Thatcher DC, Robinson MJ. An introduction to games and simulations in education. Hants: Solent Simulations; 1985.

  17. Lederman LC. Differences that make a difference: Intercultural communication, simulation, and the debriefing process in diverse interaction. In: the Annual Conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association. Kyoto, Japan, July 15–19: 1991.

  18. Petranek C. Maturation in experiental learning. Principles of simulation and gaming. Simul Gaming. 1994;25(4):513-523.

  19. Corvetto MA, Bravo MP, Montaña RA, Altermatt FR, Delfino AE. Bringing clinical simulation into an Anesthesia residency training program in a university hospital. Participant’s acceptability assessment. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2013;60:320-326.

  20. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D. A worldwide survey of the use of simulation in anesthesia. Can J Anesth. 2002;49:659-662.

  21. Nunik L. Time to fire the sim educators? Not quite yet. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39(6):1574-1575.

  22. Boet S, Bould D, Bruppacher HR, Desjardins F, Chandra D, Naik V. Looking the mirror: Self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39(6):1377-1381.

  23. Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Low- to high-fidelity simulation –a continuum of medical education? Med Educ. 2003;1:22-28.

  24. Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:279-285.

  25. Sawyer T, Sierocka-Castaneda A, Chan D, Berg B, Lustik M, Thompson M. The effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing versus oral debriefing alone at improving neonatal resuscitation performance: a randomized trial. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:213-221.

  26. Welke TM, LeBlanc VR, Savoldelli GL, Joo HS, Chandra DB, Crabtree NA, et al. Personalized oral debriefing versus standardized multimedia instruction after patient crisis simulation. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:183-189.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com