medigraphic.com
Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado

2014, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2014; 19 (2)

Usefulness of the simulator for the development of surgical skills in laparoscopy

Menchaca RLG, Méndez LSH, Menchaca MMC

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 222-228
PDF size: 582.90 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic simulator training on the necessary time to perform laparoscopic knots.
Material and methods: This was a prospective observational study to assess comparative effectiveness via descriptive analyses. The data were registered in a period of 24 months and were analyzed with normality test, correlation test, Paired Samples Test (T-test) and linear regression analysis to create a model.
Results: We found that after the training, the time required to complete the task was 46% less than the initial time.
Discussion and conclusion: Training and practice with a physical simulator improves abilities and laparoscopic skills, without expend to many time in a real patient, while improve the performance.


REFERENCES

  1. Soto Granados M. Simulador para el dominio de procedimientos básicos en cirugía laparoscópica. Diseño de un modelo práctico y económico. Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica A. C. 2002;3(1):25-27.

  2. Sánchez Margallo F. Integración de la Tecnología de Simulación Quirúrgica en el Aprendizaje de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión. Tecnologías de Simulación y Planificación Quirúrgica. pp. 9-14.

  3. Donosti. Nuevos Retos Para la Formación Médica. Ed Med 2004;7(4).

  4. García Ruiz MA. Laboratorio de Realidad Virtual en la Universidad de Colima.

  5. Meter Baumgartner. ¿Como elegir una herramienta para un modelo de aprendizaje?

  6. Delgado Gomis F. La Enseñanza de la Cirugía Laparoscópica: una asignatura Pendiente.

  7. Hunter JG, Sackier JM, Berci G. Training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg-Endosc 1994;8:28-31.

  8. Morno M, Festa V, Garsone C. Survey on Torino courses. The impact of a two-day practical course on apprenticeship and diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Italy. Surg-Endosc 1995;9:46-8.

  9. Steele RJ, Marshall K, Lang M, et al. Introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a large teaching hospital: independent audit of the first 3 years. Br J Surg 1995;82:968-71.

  10. Sariego J, Spitzer L, Matsumoto T. The learning curve in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int Surg 1993;78:1-3.

  11. Fiallo VM, O´Connor FX, Reed WP. Preceptored introduction of laparoscopic techniques for cholecystectomy into a large university affiliated medical center Surg Endosc 1994;8:1063-66.

  12. Gorostiaga A. Aprendizaje Diagnóstico y Quirúrgico Mediante endoscopía Virtual y Tutorial Inteligente. Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2002;2(45).

  13. Atul K. Madan MD. Participants opinión of laparoscopic training devices alter a basic laparoscopic training course. Am Journal of Surg 2005:758-761.

  14. Andrales GL. Evaluating Minimally Invasive Surgery Training Using Low-cost Mechanical Simulation. Surg Endoscop 2003;17:580-585.

  15. Picod G. What can the operator actually feel when performing laparoscopy? Surg Ensdoscop 2005;19:95-100.

  16. Derossis AM. The effect of practice on performance in laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endoscop 1998;12:1117-1120.

  17. Champion HR. Surgical simulation - a good idea whose time come. Britis Journal of Surgery 2003;90:767-768.

  18. Liane S. Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: Ready for despread use? Surgery 2004;135:28- 42.

  19. Aggarwal R, Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. British Journal of Surgery 2004;91:1549–1558.

  20. Moonesighe SR. Impact of Reduction in Working Hours for Doctors in Training on Postgraduate Medical Education and Patients’ Outcomes: Systematic Review; British Journal of Surgery: medscape sept 2011.

  21. Susan R. A systematic Review of Surgical Skills Transfer After Simulation-Based Training: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Endoscopy. Annals of Surgery 2014;259(2):236- 248.

  22. Rohan J. General Surgery Residency Inadequately Prepares Trainees for Fellowship. Annals of Surgery 2013;258(3):440- 449.

  23. Zendejas B. Simulation_based Mastery Learning Improves Patient Outcomes in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair. Annals of Surgery 2011;254(3):502-511.

  24. Stefandis D. Simulator Training Automaticity Leads to Improved Skill Transfer Compared With Traditional Proficiency-Based Training. Annals of Surgery 2012;255(1):30-37.

  25. Stefanidis D. Optimal acquisition and assessment of proficiency on simulators in surgery. Surg Clin N Am 2010;90:475–489.

  26. Buzink S, Soltes M, Radonak J, Fingerhut A, Hanna G, Jakimowicz J. Laparoscopic Surgical Skills programme: preliminary evaluation of Grade I Level 1 courses by trainees. Video surgery Miniinv 2012;7(3):188-192.

  27. Korndorffer JR Jr, Stefanidis D, Scott DJ. Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg 2006;191:23–27.

  28. Norkhairani AR, Zaman HB, Ahmad A. Simulation for laparoscopy surgery with haptic element for medical students in HUKM: a preliminary analysis. Visual Informatics: Sustaining Research and Innovations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, 125-138.

  29. Van Sickle KR. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1227–1231.

  30. Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS Augmented Reality Laparoscopic Simulator versus LapSim Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulator. World J Surg 2007;31:764–772.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com