medigraphic.com
ISSN 1817-5996 (Electronic)

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub de Reu 2013; 15 (1)

Clinometric in the espondiloarthritis and his indexes of measures

Suárez MR, Estévez PA, Porro NJ, González MBM, Rodríguez GA

Language: Spanish
References: 55
Page:
PDF size: 287.38 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The mobility of the vertebral column is a key sign in the ankylosing spondylitis, the same result essential to identify the inflammatory signs that present in the development of these illnesses, existing a series of indexes of measures used internationally to corroborate indirectly the diagnostic criteria of the ankylosing spondylitis and as it comports the same in the natural evolution of the illnessand when it is modified with medical treatments or physiotherapy; we present a study of the indexes that use regularly in the queries of rheumatology and physiotherapy in the Rheumatology Centre for the diagnostic and follow-up of the patients that develop this entity, as well as the criteria that reflect in the clinical histories for the epidemiological control and inquiry of this population of patients with scientific and investigation ends.


REFERENCES

  1. Van der Linden SJ, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis–a proposal for modification of the New York Criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 361-8.

  2. Moll JM. New criteria for the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol 1987; Suppl 65:12-24

  3. Lubrano E, Helliwell P. Deterioration in anthropometric measures over six years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Physiotherapy 1999; 85: 138-43.

  4. Dawes P. Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 993-6.

  5. van der Heijde D, Spoorenberg A. Plain radiographs as an outcome measure in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 985-7.

  6. Viitanen JV, Heikkila S, Kokko ML, Kautiainen H. Clinical assessment of spinal mobility measurements in ankylosing spondylitis: a compact set for follow-up and trials? Clin Rheumatol 2000; 19: 131-7.

  7. van der Heijde D, Bellamy N, Calin A, Dougadas M, Khan MA, van der Linden S. Preliminary core sets for end points in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 2225-9.

  8. van der Heijde D, Calin A, Dougadas M, Khan MA, van der Linden S, Bellamy N. Selection of instruments in the core set for DC-ART, SMARD, physical therapy, and clinical record keeping in ankylosing spondylitis. Progress report of the ASAS Working Group. Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 951-4.

  9. Haywood K L, Garratt A M, Jordan K, Dziedzic K, Dawes P T.Spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Rheumatology 2004; 43: 750-757.

  10. Bellamy N, Kaloni S, Pope J, Coulter K, Campbell J. Quantitative rheumatology: a survey of outcome measurement procedures in routine rheumatology outpatient practice in Canada. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 852-8.

  11. Bellamy N, Muirden KD, Brooks PM, Barraclough D, Tellus MM, Campbell J. A survey of outcome measurement procedures in routine rheumatology outpatient practice in Australia. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 1593-9.

  12. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The Assesment of SpondyloArtritis internacional society (ASAS) handbook:a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68 (Suppl2): 1-44.

  13. Moll JMH, Wright V: Normal range of spinal mobility: an objective clinical study. Ann Rheum Dis 1971; 30:381.

  14. Sturrock RD, Wojtulewski JA, Hart FD: Spondylometry in a normal population and in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1973; 12: 135-142.

  15. Portek I, Pearcy MJ, Reader GP, Mowat AG: Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. Br J Rheumatol. 1983; 22: 197-205.

  16. Boone DC, Azen SP, Chun-Mei L, Spence C, Baron C, Lee L: Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther. 1978; 11:1355-1360.

  17. Moll JMH, Wright V: An objective clinical study of chest expansion. Ann Rheum Dis. 1972; 31: l-8.

  18. Viitenan JV, Kautiainen H, Suni J, Kokko ML, Lehtinen K. The relative value of spinal and thoracic mobility measurements in ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol 1995; 24: 94-7.

  19. Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, Kennedy LG, Garret SL, Calin A. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS): the Bath AS metrology index. J Rheumatol.1994; 21:1694-8.

  20. Viitanen JV, Kokko ML, Heikkila S, Kautiainen H. Neck mobility assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: a clinical study of nine measurements including new tape methods for cervical rotation and lateral flexion. Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37: 377-81.

  21. Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, Kennedy GL, Garrett SL, Calin A. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 1694-8.

  22. Viitenan JV, Kautiainen H, Suni J, Kokko ML, Lehtinen K. The relative value of spinal and thoracic mobility measurements in ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol 1995; 24: 94-7.

  23. Viitanen JV, Lehtinen K, Suni J, Kautiainen H. Fifteen months’ follow-up of intensive inpatient physiotherapy and exercise in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 1995; 14: 413-9.

  24. Helliwell PS, Abbott CA, Chamberlain MA. A randomised trial of three different physiotherapy regimes in ankylosing spondylitis. Physiotherapy 1996; 82: 85-90.

  25. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Esdaile JM et al. Ankylosing spondylitis antirheumatic drug trials I: Effects of standardisation procedures on observer dependent outcome measures. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 1701-8.

  26. Tomlinson MJ, Barefoot J, Dixon AS. Intensive in-patient physiotherapy courses improve movement and posture in ankylosing spondylitis. Physiotherapy 1986; 72: 238-40.

  27. Abbott CA, Helliwell, PS, Chamberlain MA. Functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis–Evaluation of a new self-administered questionnaire and correlation with anthropometric variables. Br J Rheumatol 1994; 33:1060-6.

  28. Kennedy LG, Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, Garrett SL, Calin A. Ankylosing spondylitis: the correlation between a new metrology score and radiology. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34:767-70.

  29. Ozgocmen S, Ardicoglu O, Kaya A. The relationship of clinical and laboratory measurement to two different radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis. J Back MusculoskelRehabil 2000; 15; 37-40.

  30. Moll JMH, Wright V. The pattern of chest and spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Rehabil 1973; 12: 115-34.

  31. Madsen O.R, Hansen L.B, Rytter A, Suetta C, Egsmose C. The Bath metrology index as assessed by a trained and an untrained rater in patients with spondylarthropathy: a study of intra- and inter-rater agreements. Clin Rheumatol 2009 28:35-40.

  32. Van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Feldtkeller E. Proposal of a linear definition of the Bath Anlylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) and comparison with the 2-step and10-step definitions. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67: 489-93.

  33. Fisher LR, Cawley MI, Holgate ST. Relation between chest expansion, pulmonary function, and exercise tolerance in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 1990; 49: 921-5

  34. Carter R, Riantawan P, Banham S, Sturrock R. An investigation of factors limiting aerobic capacity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Respir Med 1999; 93: 700-8.

  35. Lee-Chiong TJ. Pulmonary manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis and relapsing polychondritis. Clin Chest Med 1998; 19: 747-57.

  36. Castro Villegas M, y Batlle Gualda E. Metrología en espondiloartritis. ReumatolClin.2010; 6 (S1):11-17.

  37. Zochling J, van der Heijde D, Burgos-Vargas R et al (2006) ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 65:442-448.

  38. Zochling J, Braun J. Assessments in ankylosing spondylitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2007 21:699-712.

  39. Collantes E, Fernández Sueiro JL, García-Vicuña R, Gratacós J, MuleroJ, Muñoz Fernández S, et al. Actualización del Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología sobre el uso de antagonistas del TNFa en las espondiloartritis, incluida la artritis psoriásica. Reumatol Clin. 2007; 3(Supl2): 60-71.

  40. Jones SD, Porter J, Garret SL, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Calin A. A new scoring system for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI). J Rheumatol. 1995; 22: 1609.

  41. Hamdi W, Azzouz D, Saadellaoui K, Daoud L, Kochbati S, Ben Hamida A, et al. Correlations between Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), functional, structural, enthesopathy, disease activity index, and quality of life in 120 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. 2007 Ann Rheum Dis 66 (Suppl II):398-403.

  42. Vesović-Potić V, Mustur D, Stanisavljević D, Ille T, Ille. Relationship between spinal mobility measures and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 2009; 29 (8): 879-884.

  43. Martindale J, Smith J, Sutton CJ, Greenan D, Goodacre L, Goodacre JA. Disease and psychological status in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology 2006; 45(10):1288-1293.

  44. Bostan EE, Borman P, Bodur H, Barça N. Functional disability and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2003; 23:121.126.

  45. Yacoub Y. I, Amine B, Laatiris A, R Abouqal, Hajjaj-Hassouni N. Spinal mobility and its impact in Moroccan patients with ankylosing spondylitis Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 30: 239–243.

  46. Van der Heijde D. Function, mobility and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64(Suppl III): 42-48.

  47. Boonen A, van der Cruyssen B, de Vlam K, Steinfeld S, Ribbens C, Lenaerts J, et al. Spinal radiographic changes in ankylosing spondylitis: association with clinical characteristics and functional outcome. J Rheumatol. 2009; 36(6):1249–1255

  48. Ariza-Ariza R, Hernandez-Cruz B, Navarro-Sarabia F. Physical function and health-related quality of life of Spanishpatients with ankylosing spondylitis. ArthritisRheum. 2003; 49:483-487

  49. Almodóvar R, Zarco P, Collantes E, González C, Mulero J, Fernández-Sueiro JL, et al. Relationship between spinal mobility and disease activity, function, quality of life and radiology. A cross-sectional Spanish registry of spondyloarthropathies (REGISPONSER). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27(3): 439-445.

  50. Wanders A, Landewe R, Dougados M, Mielants H, van der Linden SJ, van der Heijde D. Association between radiographic damage of the spine and spinal mobility for individual patients with ankylosing spondylitis: can assessment of spinal mobility be a proxy for radiographic evaluation? Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64:988-994.

  51. Claudepierre P, Wendling D. Existe-il une dissociation entre inflammation et ossification dans la spondylarthrite ? Are inflammation and ossification out of step in ankylosing spondylitis? Rev Rhum. 2008; 75 (9): 776–778.

  52. Rugiene R, Kirdaite G, Gražuleviciute E, Dadoniene J, Venalis A. The quality of life and functional ability in patients withankylosing spondylitis. Acta Medica Lituanica 2008 15(2):99–103.

  53. Turan Y, Tuncay Duruöz M, Cerrahoglu L. Quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a pilot study. RheumatolInt. 2007; 27:895–899.

  54. Yakut E, Vardar Yagli N, Akdogan A, Kalyoncu U, Kiraz S, Çalgüneri M, et al. Effects of BathAnkylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) on quality oflife in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65(Suppl II):676-680.

  55. Maksymowych W, Mallon C, Richardson C, Conner-Spady B, Jauregui E, Chung C, et al. Development and validation of the Edmonton Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 55: 575-82.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com