medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3186 (Electronic)

2014, Number 1

<< Back

Rev Acta Médica 2014; 15 (1)

PET/CT: una apuesta por una tecnología joven, revolucionaria y dinámica

López DA

Language: Spanish
References: 71
Page:
PDF size: 337.87 Kb.


ABSTRACT

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. William D. Leslie and I. David Greenberg. Nuclear Medicine. LANDES BIOSCIENCE. Georgetown, Texas U.S.A, 2003.

  2. Peter F. Sharp, Howard G. Gemmelland Alison D. Murray (Eds). Practical Nuclear Medicine. 2005. Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005. 3rd edition.

  3. David W. Townsend, PhD1,2; Jonathan P.J. Carney, PhD1; Jeffrey T. Yap, PhD1,2; and Nathan C. Hall, MD,PhD2 . PET/CT Today and Tomorrow J Nucl Med 2004.

  4. Fundamentals of PET/CT. Edu Med. Copyright 2007. Version History: Version 1.0 December 2007. http://www.360training.com .

  5. Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T, Freudenberg LF, Akhurst T, Mueller S. Dualmodality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:588-96.

  6. Goerres GW, Kamel E, Heidelberg TN, Schwitter MR, Burger C, Von Schulthess GK.PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration. Eur J NuclMed Mol Imaging. 2002;29:351-60.

  7. Wong TZ, Paulson EK, Nelson RC, Patz EF, Coleman RE. Practical approach to diagnostic CT combined with PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:622-9.

  8. Kuehl H, Veit P, Rosenbaum SJ, Bockisch A, Antoch G. Can PET/CT replace separate diagnostic CT for cancer imaging? Optimizing CT protocols for imaging cancers of the chest and abdomen. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:S45-57.

  9. Martí-Climent JM, García Velloso MJ, Serra P, et al. Tomografía por emisión de positrones con un equipo PET/TC. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2005;24:60-79.

  10. Dresel S (Ed.). PET in Oncology .Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008.

  11. Lynch TB . PET/CT in Clinical Practice. Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007.

  12. Alessio A, Kinahan PE, Cheng PM, Vesselle H and Karp J. PET/CT scanner instrumentation, challenges, and solutions. Radiol Clin N Am: 42 (2004) 1017 - 1032.

  13. Tarantola G, ZitoF, Gerundini P. PET instrumentation and reconstruction algorithms in whole-body applications. J Nucl Med (2003)744:756.

  14. Bailey DL, Townsend D, Valk PE and Maisey MN (Eds). Positron Emission Tomography, Basic Sciences. Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005.

  15. Lidia Vasconcellos de Sá . Medicina Nuclear, PET-CT no PET y CT en América Latina. REVISTA INFORMATIVA ASOCIACIÓN LATINOAMERICANA DE FÍSICA MÉDICA ALFIM. Vol.1 Nro. 2 2012.

  16. IAEA Human Health Series No1. Quality assurance for PET and PET/CT systems. Vienna, 2009. STI/PUB/1393.

  17. Zanzonico P. Positron emission tomography: a review of basic principles, scanner design and performance, and current systems. Semin Nucl Med 2004;34:87-111.

  18. Jaszczak RJ, Hoffman ED. Positron emisión tomography (PET) scatter and attenuation. In: Wagner HN, Szabo Z, Buchanan JW, eds. Principles of nuclear medicine, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1995.

  19. Xu EZ, Mullani NA, Gould LK, Anderson WL. A segmented attenuation correction for PET. J Nucl Med 1991;32:161-5.

  20. Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Atennuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys 1998;25:2046-53.

  21. KALENDER, W.A., Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications, Publicis MCD Verlag, Munich (2000).

  22. A Calzado, J Geleijns. Tomografía computarizada. Evolución, principios técnicos y aplicaciones. Rev Fis Med 2010;11(3):163-180.

  23. Goldman L. Principles of CT and evolution of CT technology. In: Goldman LW, Fowlkes JB, eds. Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics: CT and US Cross-Sectional Imaging. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America; 2000:33-52.

  24. Centre for Evidence-based purchasing (CEP). Wide bore CT scanners. Comparative specifications: CEP 08029; NH PASA March 2009.

  25. Kak AC, Slaney M. Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, 1988. http://www.slaney.org/pct

  26. Kalender W. Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications. 2nd Edition. Erlangen: Publicist Corporate Publishing; 2005.

  27. Buzug TM. Computed Tomography: From Photon Statistics to Modern Cone- Beam CT. Berlín: Springer Verlag; 2008.

  28. Hsieh J. Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances. Second edition. Bellinghan: SPIE Press Book; 2009.

  29. Wang G, Yu H, De Man B. An outlook on x-ray CT research and development. Med Phys 2008;35:1051-64.

  30. Herman GT. Image Reconstruction from Projections: The Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography. New York: Academic Press; 1980.

  31. Ye YB, Wang G. Filtered back projection formula for exact image reconstruction from cone-beam data along a general scanning curve. Med Phys 2005;32:42- 48.

  32. Ye YB, Zhao SY, Yu HY, Wang G. A general exact reconstruction for cone-beam CT via back projection-filtration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24:1190-98.

  33. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. Abdominal CT: Comparison of Low-Dose CT With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction and Routine-Dose CT With Filtered Back Projection in 53 Patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:713-9.

  34. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Süss C, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006;16:256-68.

  35. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Vorobiof G, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:535-6.

  36. PSchardt P, Deuringer J, Freudenberger J, Hell E, Knuepfer W, Mattern D, Schild M. New X-ray tube performance in computed tomography by introducing the rotating envelope tube technology. Med Phys 2004;31:2699-706.

  37. Crawford CR, King KF. Computed tomography scanning with simultaneous patient translation. Med Phys 1990;17:967-82.

  38. Cody DD, Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technologic advances in multidetector CT with a focus on cardiac imaging. Radiographics 2007;27:1829-37.

  39. Flohr TG, Stierstorfer K, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H, Primak AN, McCollough CH. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. Med Phys 2005;32:2536-47.

  40. OIEA. Curso de Protección Radiológica en PET/CT. 2008. https://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/AdditionalResources/Training/ 1_TrainingMaterial/PETCT.htm

  41. Kyriakou Y, Kachelrieß M, Knaup M, Krause J, Kalender WA. Impact of the zflying focal spot on resolution and artefact behaviour for a 64-slice spiral CT scanner. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1206-15.elc N. Dual energy CT: physics principles. Med Phys 2008; 35:2861.

  42. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008;246:742-53.

  43. Donnino R, Jacobs JE, Doshi JV, Hecht EM, Kim DC, Babb JS, et al. Dual-source versus single-source cardiac CT angiography: comparison of diagnostic image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1051-6.

  44. De Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, LJ Kroft, de Roos A, Reiber JHC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1908-15.

  45. Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, Baumueller S, Goetti S, Plass A, et al. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart 2010;96:933-8.

  46. Seguchi S, Aoyama T, Koyama S, Fujii K, Yamauchi-Kawaura C. Patient radiation dose in prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography and retrospectively gated helical technique with a 320-detector row CT scanner. Med Phys 37;5579-85.

  47. Haaga JR. Interventional CT: 30 years' experience. Eur Radiol Suppl 2005;15 [Suppl 4]:D116-20.

  48. OIEA. Curso de Protección Radiológica en Radiología. 2010. https://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/AdditionalResources/Training/ 1_TrainingMaterial/Radiology.htm

  49. Tack D, De MV, Petit W, Scillia P, Muller P, Suess C, Gevenois PA. Multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography: comparison of standard dose and simulated low-dose techniques. Radiology 2005; 236:318-25.

  50. Van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, Nio CY, Determann RM, Tipker CA, et al. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 2002; 224:25-33.

  51. Joemai RM, Geleijns J, Veldkamp WJ. Development and validation of a low dose simulator for computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:958-66.

  52. Jochem W, Wolthaus H, Jan-Jakoe S,PH.D. et al. Comparison of different strategies to use four-dimensional CT in in treatment planning for lung cancer patients. I. J. Radiation Oncology Biology Physics Volume 70, Number 4, 2008

  53. Jochem W, Wolthaus H, Schneider C. et al. Mid- ventilation CT scan construction from 4-dimensional respiration-correlated CT scans for radiotherapy planning of lung cancer. I. J. Radiation Oncology . Biology . Physics Volume 65, Number 5, 2006

  54. Ramírez JC, Arboleda C,. McCollough H C. Tomografía computarizada por rayos X: fundamentos y actualidad. Revista Ingeniería Biomédica 2008, volumen 2, número 4, julio-diciembre 2008: 13-31.

  55. IAEA HUMAN HEALTH SERIES No.19. Quality Assurance Program for Computed Tomography: Diagnostic and Therapy Applications. IAEA 2012.

  56. Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1369-79.

  57. Townsend DW. A combined PET/CT scanner: the choices. J Nucl Med 2001;42:533-4.

  58. GEMINI™ The world's first and only OPEN PET/CT. Philips Medical. http://www.medical.philips.com

  59. Sopena R, Martí-Bonmatí L. Técnicas de imagen multimodalidad. Todo Hospital 2009; 255:190-196

  60. Medical Imaging PET/CT. Siemens. http://www.healthcare.siemens.com

  61. Discovery PET/CT 710. GE Healthcare. http://www.gehealthcare.com

  62. National Electrical Manufacturers Association(2001).NEMA Standard Publication NU2-2001.Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn,VA.

  63. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (2007).NEMA Standard Publication NU2-2007.Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn,VA.

  64. Yusuf E. Erdi; Sadek A. Nehmeh,; Tim Mulnix; John L. Humm; and Charles C. Watson. PET Performance Measurements for an LSO Based Combined PET/CT Scanner Using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 Standard. J Nucl Med 2004; 45:813-821.

  65. NEMA NU 2-2001 Performance Measurements of an LYSO-Based PET/CT System in 2D and 3D Acquisition Modes. Brad J. Kemp, Chang Kim, John J. Williams, Alexander Ganin, and Val J. Lowe. J Nucl Med 2006; 47:1960-1967

  66. Surti S, et al. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET-CT scanner with special consideration for its time- of-flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med 48(3):471- 480 (2007).

  67. Muzic RF and Kolthammer JA. PET performance of the GEMINI TF. A time-offlight PET-CT scanner. Conference Record of the IEEE NSS 1940-1944 (2006).

  68. Watson CC et al. NEMA NU2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity. J Nucl Med 45(5):822-826 (2004).

  69. Positron Emission Tomography (PET): A GUIDE FOR CLINICIANS. Medical Imaging for the 21st Century . IAEA 2010.

  70. IAEA Safety Report Series No. 58. Radiation Protection in newer medical imaging techniques PET/CT. IAEA, VIENNA. 2008.

  71. IAEA-TECDOC-1603. The Role of PET/CT in Radiation Treatment Planning for Cancer Patient Treatment. IAEA, VIENNA, 2008.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com