Alfonso VH, Morejón ÁFC, García DC, Corbo RMT, Díaz BH

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 473-480
PDF size: 141.73 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: a prospective study was conducted with the use of the retropropulsor and stimulator of Professor Indalecio Buño in 24 patients with mandibular prognathism in mixed dentition.
Objective: to know the cephalometric changes during the use of the retropupulsor and stimulator.
Material and methods: patients underwent lateral radiographs before and twelve months after, comparing cephalometric changes obtained as a result of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes achieved, taking into account sex too.
Results: statistically increase of SNA angle and very significant reduction in SNB angle were found, which represented a significant change of the ANB angle.
Connclusions: regarding sex, there were significant changes in the SNA angle in males and in females in SNB angle, in addition to a significant variation in females of 1 SNB angle. These changes helped in improving the profile, concave, and to uncross previous bites that characterize patients with class III mandibular prognathism syndrome.

REFERENCES

1. Bedoya A, Chacón A. Tratamiento temprano de maloclusiones clase II tratado con Activador Abierto Elástico de Klammt (AAEK). Reporte de caso. Rev Estomat. 2009; 17(2): 23-29.

2. Ceballos J. Tratamiento de una maloclusion de clase III de Angle esquelética. Ortod Esp. 2001; 41: 64-71.

3. Chaqués J. Tratamiento ortopédico-ortodóncico de un caso complejo de maloclusión de clase III esquelética. Ortod Esp. 2001; 41: 228-37.

4. Kapur A, Chawla HS, Utreja A, Goyal A. Early class III occlusal tendency in children and its selective management. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008; 26(3): 107-13.

5. Chaqués J. Tratamiento no-quirúrgico de un «caso límite» de maloclusion de clase III esquelética en un paciente adulto. REO. 2001; 31: 21-7.

6. Martín D, Goenaga P, Canabez A, Zabalegui I, Ochagavía JM. Tratamiento multidisciplinario de un caso complejo de clase III esquelética. REO. 2002; 32: 241-52.

7. Silva-Esteves Fernando Raffo Rivera N. Shirley. Diversas formas del tratamiento temprano de la maloclusión Pseudo Clase III. Reporte de casos Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima-Perú Odontol Pediatr. 2010 ene. Jun; 9(1).

8. Larriu Castro A, Palomero R. Reposición condilar: tratamiento multidisciplinar en una clase III esqueletal. Ortod Esp 2002; 42:151-8.

9. Bedoya A, Franco-Quintero G. Tratamiento de maloclusion clase II con aparatología ortopédica funcional: Bionator. Reporte de un caso. Rev Estomat. 2010; 18(1):24-29.

10. Pancherz H. Mechaism of class II corrección in Herbst appliance treatment. Am J Orthod. 1982; 82: 104.

11. McNamara J. Baccetti T, Stahl. Dentofacial growth changes in subjets with untreated class II malocclusion from late puberty through young adulthood. Am journal orthod dentofacial orthopedics. 2009; 135:148-54.

12. Schneckuth CE. Mandibular reposition with Frankel appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88: 177.

13. Ngan P, Häag U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wei S H. Cephalometric comparisons of Chinese and Caucasian surgical Class III patients. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg. 1997; 12: 177-88.

14. Asensi C, Llamas JM, Fernández E. Situación actual del tratamiento ortodóncico de las maloclusiones de clase III. Una revisión bibliográfica sobre los efectos de la mentonera occipital, tracción anterior del maxilar y aparatología bimaxilar en los prognatismos mandibulares. Acta Estomatol Valenciana. 1986; 1: 103-12.

15. Levin SA, McNamara JA, Franchi J, Baccetti and Frankel C. Short-term and long-term treatment out comes with the FR-3 appliance of Frankel. Am J orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2008, 134: 513-24.

16. Marsico E, Gatto E, Burcascans M, Marterese Gabd Cordasco G, Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliance on mandibular growth in the short-term. Am J Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2011: 139; 24-36.

17. Tuesta Bernaola O. Cambios ortopédicos y dentoalveolares producidos por la aparatología functional. Facultad de Estomatología Roberto Beltrán Univ. Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima Perú, 2011.

18. Suda N, Suzuki Ml. Hirose K. Effective treatment plan for maxillary protraction: is the bone age useful to determine the treatment plan? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118: 56-62

19. Kapur A, Chawla HS, Utreja A, Goyal A. Early class III occlusal tendency in children and its selective management. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008; 26(3):107-10.

20. Rabie ABM. Does the degree of advancement during functional appliance therapy matter? European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;30 (3):274-82.

21. Gupta A, Kohli V, Hazarey P, Kharbanda O, Gunjal A. Stress distribution in thetemporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: A 3-dimensionalfinite element method study. Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:737-48.