medigraphic.com

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Med Repro 2014; 6.7 (3)

Oocyte donation

López-Gálvez JJ, Moreno-García JM, Vital- Reyes VS

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 145-157
PDF size: 422.46 Kb.


ABSTRACT

New trends in the global population growth have generated important changes in cultural patterns. Together with that, new requirements in reproductive health have emerged. For instance, it is frequent to observe women looking for a pregnancy at the edge of optimal fertility, as well as women with alterations in their ovarian reserve. Unfortunately, in both circumstances the prognostic of pregnancy is poor. From this point of view, ovocite donation is a pro-fertility alternative which is available with high rates of success. Oocyte donation satisfies the genuine right of motherhood and in addition, it provides an opportunity to learn more about reproductive physiology and the irrefutable anatomical role of uterus in fertility. Current legislation in Spain clearly points to the anonymous and altruistic sense of oocyte donation, and states the suitability of donors and the essential laboratory tests. Thus, the goal of the present study is to share our experience in the egg donation procedures conducted routinely during several years in the Unit of Reproduction Vista Hermosa in Alicante, Spain; emphasizing the study protocol, which is congruent with the current legislation, as well as the technical procedures, and the program achievements.


REFERENCES

  1. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica. Proyecciones de Población. España, 2012. Comunicado de prensa. Madrid, España. http://www.ine.es

  2. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian folliclesin midlife: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992;71342-46.

  3. Porreco RP, Harden L, Gambotto M, Shapiro H. Expectation of pregnancy outcome among mature women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:38-41.

  4. Heape W. Preliminary note on the transplantation and growth of mammaliam ova in a foster mother. Preceendings of the Reproductive Society of London 1890;48:477- 81.

  5. Bustillo M, Buster JE, Cohen SW, et al. Delivery of healthy infant following nonsurgical ovum transfer. JAMA 1984;251:889-94.

  6. Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2013:28:2318-2331.

  7. Real Decreto 412/1996. BOE.1996; 72:11253-11256.

  8. Ley 14/2006. BOE. 2006; 126:19947-19956.

  9. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines for oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2004;82 Suppl 1: S13-5.

  10. Keck C, Bassett R, Ludwig M. Factors influencing response to ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:562- 569.

  11. Griesinger G, Dietrich K, Dovroey P, Kolibianakis EM. GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maduration in the GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Up 2006;12:159-168.

  12. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the Society for Assited Reproductive Technology. Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation: a Practice Committee Report. Fertil Steril 2008;90:S30-S44.

  13. Pantos K, Meimeti-Damianaki T, Vaxevanoglou T, Kapetanakis E. Oocyte donation in menopausal women aged over 40 years. Hum Reprod 1993;8:488-91.

  14. Abdalla HI, Wren ME, Thomas A, Korea L. Age of the uterus does not affect pregnancy or implantation rates; a study of egg donation in women of different ages sharing oocytes from the same donor. Hum Reprod 1997;12:827-9.

  15. Salihu HM, Shumpert MN, Slay M, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:1006-14.

  16. Astolfi P, Zonta LA. Risks of preterm delivery and association with maternal age, birth order, and fetal gender. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2891-4.

  17. Privitera L, Alamá SA, Gaikwad y colbs. Donación de ovocitos y preparación endometrial en receptoras. En: Manual práctico de Esterilidad y Reproducción Humana. 4ª ed. Madrid: Panamerica, 2012;361-371.

  18. Younis JS, Simon A, Laufer N. Endometrial preparation: lessons from oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 1996;66:873-84.

  19. Ben-Nun I, Ghetler Y, Gruber A, Jaffe R, Fejgin M. Egg donation in an in vitro fertilization program: an alternative approach to cycle synchronization and timing of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1989;52:683-7.

  20. Leeton J, Rogers P, King C, Healy D. A comparison of pregnancy rates for 131 donor oocyte transfers using either a sequential or fixed regime of steroid replacement therapy. Hum Reprod 1991;6:299-301.

  21. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Choe J, Lurie D, Dietterich C. The effect of endometrial thickness and echo pattern on in vitro fertilization outcome in donor oocyte embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril 1993;59:72-5.

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2000 Assisted reproduction Technology Succes Rates: National Summary and Fertlity Clinic Reports. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, December 2001.

  23. Faber BM, Mercan R, Hamacher P, Muasher SJ, Toner JP. The impact of an egg donor’s age and her prior fertility on recipient pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 1997; 68:370-2.

  24. Garrido N, Bellver J, Remohi J, Alama P. Pellicer A. Cumulative newborn rates increase with the total number of transferred embryos according to an analysis of 15,792 ovum donation cycles. Fertil Steril 2012;98:341-6.

  25. Zenke U, Chetkowski R. Transfer and uterine factors are the major recipent-related determinants of success with donor eggs. Fertil Steril 2004;82:850-856.

  26. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Rare occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in oocyte donors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;52:259-62.

  27. Fielder K, Ezcurra D. Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation síndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012;10:32-39.

  28. Jain A, Robins JC, Williams DB, Thomas MA. The effect of multiple cycles in oocyte donors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1382-84.

  29. Luk J, Arici A. Does the ovarian reserve decrease from repetead ovulation stimulations? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010;22:177-182.

  30. Wiggins DA, Main E. Outcomes of pregnancies achieved by donnor egg in vitro fertilization. A comparasion with standar in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:2002-2008.

  31. Le Ray C, Scherier S, Anselm O, Marszalek A, Tsataris V, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Association between oocyte donation and maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 43 years or older. Hum Reprod 2012;27:896-901.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com