medigraphic.com
ISSN 1405-0315 (Print)

2013, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Enf Cardiol 2013; 21 (3)

Description of the perceived quality of life in patients with chronic renal failure in three modes of renal replacement therapy in the state of Guanajuato, México

Meza-García CF, Reynaga-Ornelas L, Baldwin CM, Caudillo-Cisneros C, Dávalos-Pérez A, Jiménez-Garza OA

Language: Spanish
References: 39
Page: 103-110
PDF size: 173.51 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Quality of life assessment represents the perceived impact of the disease and the consequent treatment on patient wellness. Objective: To describe the quality of life perceived by patients with end stage renal disease. Material and methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study on 30 adult patients in three different renal replacement therapies attending to a dialysis clinic located in Guanajuato state. SF-36 questionnaire was used to measure quality of life through eight different domains. PASW statistics 18 was used for statistical analysis. Results: In a 1 to 100 scale, the scores per domain were: physical function 37.6, physical role 35.8, pain 64.7, general health 58.5, vitality 59, social function 86.7, emotional role 68.9 and mental health 77.2. There is a trend to perceive a better quality of life in automated peritoneal dialysis compared with continued ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Conclusion: The quality of life from renal disease patients was most affected with respect to physical function. To know the perceived general health status of patients reported on the effectiveness of treatment and provides guidance for designing strategies for nursing care with a holistic approach.


REFERENCES

  1. Collins AJ, Gilbertson DT, Snyder JJ, Chen SC, Foley RN. Chronic kidney disease awareness, screening and prevention: rationale for the design of a public education program. Nephrology. 2010; 15: 37-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01312.x.

  2. Saran R, Hedgeman E, Huseini M, Stack A, Shahinian V. Surveillance of chronic kidney disease around the world: Tracking and reining in a global problem. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010; 17(3): 271-181. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2010.03.001

  3. Atkins RC, Zimmet P. Diabetic kidney disease: act now or pay later? “World Kidney Day”. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2010; 80(1): 44-47.

  4. Cusumano A, García-García G, González-Bedat C. The Latin American dialysis and transplant registry: report 2006. Ethn Dis. 2009; 19(S1): 3-6.

  5. Mendez-Durán A, Méndez-Bueno JF, Tapia-Yáñez T, Muñoz-Montes A, Aguilar-Sánchez L. Epidemiología de la insuficiencia renal crónica en México. Diálisis y Trasplante. 2010; 31(1): 7-11.

  6. Paniagua R, Ramos A, Fabián R, Lagunas J, Amato D. Peritoneal dialysis in America. Chronic kidney disease and dialysis in Mexico. Perit Dial Int. 2007; 27: 405-409.

  7. Fundación Mexicana del Riñón. Pacientes en terapia renal en México [Internet]. México; 2008. Disponible en: http://www.fundrenal.org.mx

  8. Nissenson AR. Measuring, managing, and improving quality in the end-stage renal disease treatment setting: peritoneal dialysis. Am J of Kidney Dis. 1994; 24(2): 368-375.

  9. The World Health Organization Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41(10): 1403-1409.

  10. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patients’ outcomes. JAMA. 1995; 273(1): 59-65.

  11. Anderson KL, Burckhardt CS. Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life as an outcome variable for health care intervention and research. J Adv Nurs. 1999; 29(2): 298-306.

  12. Bakewel AB, Higgins RM, Edmunds ME. Quality of Life in peritoneal dialysis patients: decline over time and association with clinical outcomes. Kidney Int. 2000; 6: 239-248.

  13. Lii YC, Tsay SL, Wang TJ. Group intervention to improve quality of life in haemodialysis patients. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16(11c): 268-275.

  14. Morsch CM, Goncalves LF, Barros E. Health-related quality of life among haemodialysis patients-relationship with clinical indicators, morbidity and mortality. J Clin Nurs. 2006; 15: 498-504.

  15. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483.

  16. Schatell D, Witten B. Measuring dialysis patients’ health-related quality of life with the KDQOL-36: Medical Education Institute, Inc. 2008. Disponible en: http://www.lifeoptions.org/kdqol/pdfs/kdqol- 36_pros_v1.2.pdf

  17. Cummings RA. Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005; 49(10): 699-706.

  18. Ferrans CE, Zerwick JJ, Wilbur JE, Larson JL. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005; 37(4): 336-342.

  19. Haas BK. Clarification and integration of similar quality of life concepts. J Nurs Scholarsh. 1999; 31(3): 215-220.

  20. Joyce CRB, Hickey A, McGee HM, O’Boyle CA. A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: The SEIQoL. Qual Life Res. 2003; 12: 275-280.

  21. Rapkin BD, Schwartz CE. Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2: 14. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-14

  22. Souza KH, Chen FF. A theoretical approach to measuring quality of life. J Nurs Meas. 2002; 10(1): 47-58.

  23. Schwartzmann L. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud: aspectos conceptuales. Cienc Enferm. 2003; 9(2): 9-21.

  24. Ventegodt S, Merrick J, Andersen NJ. Quality of life theory I: The IQOL Theory: an integrative theory of the global quality of life concept. Scientific World Journal. 2003; 3: 1030-1040.

  25. Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó M. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): Un instrumento para la medida con resultados clínicos. Med Clin. 1995; 104(20): 771-776.

  26. Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Rajmil L, Rebollo P, Permanyer G, Quintana J et al. The Spanish version of the Short Form 36 Health Survey: a decade of experience and new developments. Gac Sanit. 2005; 2: 135-150.

  27. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczec AE. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1994; 32(1): 40-66.

  28. Secretaría de Salud (MX). Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud en Materia de Investigación para la Salud [Internet]. México. 1984. Disponible en: http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/rlgsmis.html

  29. Durán-Arenas L, Gallegos-Carrillo K, Salinas-Escudero G, Martínez-Salgado H. Hacia una base normativa mexicana en la medición de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, mediante el Formato Corto 36.Salud Publica Mex. 2004; 46(4): 306-315.

  30. Zúñiga CSM, Dapueto PJ, Müller OH, Kirsten LL, Alid AR, Ortiz ML. Health related quality of life among patients on chronic hemodialysis. Rev Med Chil. 2009; 137: 300-207.

  31. Mingardi G, Cornalba L, Cortinovis E, Ruggiata R, Moscón P, Apolone G. Health-related quality of life in dialysis patients. A report from an Italian study using the SF-36. Health Survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999; 14: 1503-1510.

  32. Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte-Jensen P, Klem S, Almtoft B, Danielsen H et al. A prospective randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int. 1999; 19: 526-533.

  33. Esquivel-Molina CG, Prieto-Fierro JG, López-Robledo J, Ortega-Carrasco R, Martínez-Mendoza JA, Velasco-Rodríguez VM. Calidad de vida y depresión en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica terminal en hemodiálisis. Medicina Intern Mex. 2009; 25(6): 443-449.

  34. Vazquez I, Valderrábano F, Fort J, Jofré R, López-Gómez JM, Moreno F et al. Diferencias en la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud entre hombres y mujeres en tratamiento con hemodiálisis. Nefrología. 2004; 24(2): 167-178.

  35. Brown EA, Johansson L, Farrington K, Gallager H, Sensky T, Gordon F et al. Broadening options for long-term dialysis in de elderly (BOLDE): differences in quality of life on peritoneal dialysis compared to haemodialysis for older patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Nov 2010; 25(11): 3755-3763. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq212

  36. Shrestha S, Ghotekar LR, Sharma SK, Shangwa PM, Karki P. Assessment of quality of life in patients of end stage renal disease on different modalities of treatment. JNMA. 2008; 47(169): 1-6.

  37. Panagopoulou A, Hardalias A, Berati S, Fourtounas C. Psychosocial issues and quality of life in patients on renal replacement therapy. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2009; 20(2): 212-218.

  38. Caballero-Morales S, Trujillo-Garcia JU, Welsh-Orozco U, Hernandez-Cruz ST, Martinez-Torres J. Quality of life in patients with hemodialysis and ambulatory and automated continuous peritoneal dialysis. Arch Med Fam. 2006; 8(3): 163-168.

  39. De Wit GA, Merkus MP, Krediet RT, De Charro F. A comparison of quality of life of patients on automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2001; 21(3): 306-312.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com