Montoya PA, Marañón REJ, Rodríguez AY, Álvarez RCM, Salgado CA

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 309-325
PDF size: 617.20 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the depth level measurement methods of the hypnotic effect of anesthetic drugs, from the quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram, need to be corrected and optimized to guarantee their efficient application in the clinical practice.
Objective: to evaluate the effects of the anesthetic depth level and of the record derivation in the parameters of the quantitative electroencephalogram, to guarantee the selection of optimal parameters in the classification of the anesthetic depth level.
Methods: a sample of 29 adults with abdominal disorders, surgically treated through endoscopy, under general anaesthesia was studied. The electroencephalographic record was carried out by means of a 19 channels assembly and the level of anesthetic depth was clinically quantified by means of an 8 levels scale. Equally, the parameters of the quantitative electroencephalogram were calculated by means of the analysis system of the Medicid 5 equipment of Neuronic.
Results: the level of anesthetic depth presented a significant effect in the parameters of the quantitative electroencephalogram, in the spectral models of broad and narrow band. Among the parameters with more significance there were: the absolute power delta, theta, the relative power theta and the mean frequency theta, alpha and total; while in the narrow band parameters a significant effect was obtained in all derivations, with a significant interaction between the topography and the anesthetic depth level.
Conclusions: the parameters of the quantitative electroencephalogram can be used in an effective way in the prediction of the anesthetic depth level, with a higher resolution in the classification levels than those used up to now. Also, the selective effect of the hypnotic agents was confirmed in the different cortical areas.

REFERENCES

1. Klaus B, Schneider G, Eder M, Ranft A, Kochs EF, Zieglgänsberger W, Dodt HU. Anaesthesia monitoring by recurrence quantification analysis of EEG data. PLoS One. 2010; 5(1): 8876.

2. Liu WH, Thorp TA, Graham GS, Aitkenhead AR. Incidence of awareness with recall during general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1991; 46(6): 435-7.

3. Koskinen M. Automatic assessment of functional suppression of the central nervous system due to propofol anethetic infusion from EEG phenomena to a quantitative index [tesis en línea]. Ciudad de Oulu: Universidad de Oulu; 2006. p. 21-6 [citado 3 Dic 2012]. Disponible en: http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn95142817 56/isbn95 14281 756.pdf

4. Rampil IJ. A Primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998; 89(4): 980-1002.

5. Sinha PK, Koshy T. Monitoring devices for measuring the depth of anesthesia: an overview. Indian J Anesth. 2007; 51(5): 365-75.

6. Anderson RE, Jakobsson JG. Cerebral state monitor, a new small handheld EEG monitor for determining depth of anaesthesia:a clinical comparison with the bispectral index during day-surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006; 23(3): 208-12.

7. Jensen EW, Litvan H, Revuelta M, Rodriguez BE, Caminal P, Martinez P, et al. Cerebral state index during propofol anesthesia: a comparison with the bispectral index and the A-line ARX index. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(1): 28-33.

8. Maitre PO, Buhrer M, Shafer SL, Stanski DR. Estimating the rate of thiopental bloodbrain equilibration using pseudo steady-state serum concentrations. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1990; 18(3): 175-87.

9. Johansen JW, Sebel PS. Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93(5): 1336- 44.

10. Berkenbosch JW, Fichter CR, Tobias JD. The correlation of the biespectral index monitor with clinical sedation scores during mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94(3): 506–11.

11. Horn B, Pilge S, Kochs EF, Stockmanns G, Hock A, Schneider G. A combination of electroencephalogram and auditory evoked potentials separates different levels of anesthesia in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(5): 1512-21.

12. Al-Kadi MI, Reaz MB, Ali MA. Evolution of electroencephalogram signal analysis techniques during anesthesia. Sensors (Basel). 2013; 13(5): 6605–35.

13. Nicolaou N, Hourris S, Alexandrou P, Georgiou J. EEG-based automatic classification of 'awake' versus 'anesthetized' state in general anesthesia using Granger causality. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3): 33869.

14. Sellers KK, Bennett DV, Hutt A, Frohlich F. Anesthesia differentially modulates spontaneous network dynamics by cortical area and layer. J Neurophysiol. 2013; 110(12): 2739-51.

15. Lee U, Ku S, Noh G, Baek S, Choi B, Mashour GA. Disruption of frontal-parietal communication by ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118(6): 1264-75.

16. Hayashi K, Mukai N, Sawa T. Simultaneous bicoherence analysis of occipital and frontal electroencephalograms in awake and anesthetized subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 125(1): 194-201.

17. Kamei S, Morita A, Serizawa K, Mizutani T, Hirayanagi K. Quantitative EEG analysis of executive dysfunction in Parkinson disease. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 27(3): 193–9.

18. Hayashi K, Sawa T, Matsuura M. Anesthesia depth-dependent features of electroencephalographic bicoherence spectrum during sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2008; 108(5): 841-50.

19. Nicolaou N, Georgiou J. Neural network-based classification of anesthesia/awareness using Granger causality features. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2013. Jul 1.