2013, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Arch Neurocien 2013; 18 (2)
Sacrococcygeal chordoma appellant to twenty years: a case report
Escobar-de la Garma VH, Padilla-Vázquez F, Elizalde-Martínez E
Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 99-103
PDF size: 139.84 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Chordomas are rare slow growing, locally agressive bone tumours occuring in axial skeleton, with a predominance in
the sacrococcygeal region. The mortality of these tumours depends of the rate of recurrence, directly involved with
the efficacy of the primary modality of treatment, which in all cases must be surgical with wide resection margins.
Objectives: report the case of a sacrococcygeal chordoma and literature review.
Clinical case: we present the case
of a seventh-decade female with history of en bloc-sacral resection for removal of a sacrococcygeal chordoma 24
years ago. Three months earlier she presented with progressive weakness of right leg and foot, preventing her from
walking, plus anaesthesia in right dermatomes L4-S1 and urinary/fecal incontinence. Magnetic Resonance Imaging
revealed a well-delimeted giant round pelvic mass 7 cms-diameter, next to the ventral sacral side, destroying adyacent
bone with multiple intensities in T2. Biopsy revealed recurrence of sacrococcygeal chordoma despite the long time
the patient remained cured.
Conclusions: wide-margin surgery is the primary treatment modality in sacrococcygeal
chordomas. It is not infrequent to find relapses after en-bloc resection of sacrococcygeal chordomas, and all recurrences
must be agressively treated and performed by a multidisciplinary team constituted by neurosurgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, surgical oncologists, plastic reconstructive surgeons and all the people with expertise treating this rare
neoplasm.
REFERENCES
Chugh R, Tawbi H, Lucas DR, Biermann JS, Schuetze SM, Baker LH. Chordoma: the nonsarcoma primary bone tumor. Oncologist [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review]. 2007; 12(11): 1344-50.
Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Mohyeldin A, Coumans JV, Kahle KT. Chordoma: current concepts, management, and future directions. Lancet Oncol [Review]. 2012;13(2):e69-76.
Kaiser TE, Pritchard DJ, Unni KK. Clinicopathologic study of sacrococcygeal chordoma. Cancer 1984; Jun 1;53(11):2574-8.
Ferraresi V, Nuzzo C, Zoccali C, Marandino F, Vidiri A, Salducca N, et al. Chordoma: clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of a case series of 25 patients. BMC Cancer 2010; 10:22.
Jeys L, Gibbins R, Evans G, Grimer R. Sacral chordoma: a diagnosis not to be sat on? Int Orthop 2008;32(2):269-72.
Sung MS, Lee GK, Kang HS, Kwon ST, Park JG, Suh JS, et al. Sacrococcygeal chordoma: MR imaging in 30 patients. Skeletal Radiol [Evaluation Studies]. 2005 Feb;34(2):87-94.
Hsieh PC, Xu R, Sciubba DM, McGirt MJ, Nelson C, Witham TF, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes following en bloc resections for sacral chordomas and chondrosarcomas: a series of twenty consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2233-9.
Stener B, Gunterberg B. High amputation of the sacrum for extirpation of tumors. Principles and technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). [Case Reports]. 1978;3(4):351-66.
Yang H, Zhu L, Ebraheim NA, Liu X, Castillo S, Tang T, et al. Analysis of risk factors for recurrence after the resection of sacral chordoma combined with embolization. Spine J 2009; Dec;9(12):972-80.
Bergh P, Kindblom LG, Gunterberg B, Remotti F, Ryd W. Prognostic factors in chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine: a study of 39 patients. Cancer [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2000;88(9):2122-34.
Ahmed AR. Safety margins in resection of sacral chordoma: analysis of 18 patients. Arch Ortho Traum Surg 2009; 129 (4):483-7.
Hanna SA, Aston WJ, Briggs TW, Cannon SR, Saifuddin A. Sacral chordoma: can local recurrence after sacrectomy be predicted? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; Sep;466(9):2217-23.
Chen KW, Yang HL, Kandimalla Y, Liu JY, Wang GL. Review of current treatment of sacral chordoma. Orthop Surg [Review]. 2009;1(3):238-44.